I've been bagging Adam Creighton as an unreliable commentator on matters economic for years now - and in a column at The Australian today (which I presume will be making Jason Soon grind his teeth) Adam has gone into bat for the "this has all been an over-reaction" crowd.
In fact, Jason: you seem to be having an all out crisis of confidence as to who on the conservative-ish side of commentary you can possibly trust now. You hate "glibertarians" (fair enough) now but conservatives keep coming up short.
I think you should just give up and just accept my lines: the soft (and harder) Left may be annoying on identity politics, but they don't jeopardise entire planetary populations' safety by denying/downplaying climate change or pandemics because of culture wars and conspiracy ideation. They may (if you can count Democrats as "soft Left" at all) try to play at Middle East interventions in a way that does not always work out, but the entire Muslim world there is a a geo-political nightmare and you can't expect great outcomes. International co-operation on trade and all matters is way, way better than populist nationalism: the fact that a cynical dictator thug like Putin is encouraging the West to break up into nationalist enclaves shows it is obviously the wrong path. And Trump is an absolute idiot of a damaged man and any commentator who defends him in any respect at all deserves to be completely ignored.
2 comments:
Creighton was always unreliable. I do notice the denialists are now on the wrong side of the virus. Not unusual
Adam is really good. He's been ahead of the pack in realising that the neoclassical school wasn't the full and revealed truth. He's a solid act. The others are getting there but Adam is a few years ahead.
Post a Comment