A few comments about the news:
* it has suddenly brought up a story that had been reported before, but forgotten by most, even if we saw brief mention of it previously (I think that's me!): the hush money payment to a doorman about a possible Trump illegitimate child.
* I heard a guy on Radio National saying that the trial won't be until the end of next year - the election year. If true, that alone is enough to put a spanner in a Trump campaign.
* I am wondering if any conspiracy nut is going to come up with the argument that the judge not giving a gag order now is actually a devious plan to lure Trump into making statements that can be used in evidence against him, and as such is all part of the great conspiracy against him.
* Can someone with more time on their hands than me ask one of those AI image generators to come up with a celebration cake for Happy Arraignment Day - perhaps with 34 candles on it?
Update: well, this article is pretty close to what I predicted - a Trumpy commentator complaining that not gagging Trump and just giving him a warning is "a trap" - they're just waiting for him to mouth off. Well, duh.
1 comment:
if the prosecution case is as weak as Trump's team says it is then it will be a very easy win.
Post a Comment