I can't get my head around why prosecutors are so keen to see Alec Baldwin suffer:
Special prosecutors say they plan to present the New Mexico Grand Jury with a criminal case against Alec Baldwin in the fatal shooting of the cinematographer on the movie set of Rust.
Even if he pulled the trigger (which seems to be what the "new evidence" relating to the gun must be about), why would a jury blame a guy who was obviously relying on the person he employed to provide a safe gun to use? I mean, if the armourer was some unqualified relative, or something, I could understand it, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment