I still drop in sometimes to see what chronic grievance whirlpool Sandy O'Sullivan is up to. Here's today's entry:
"We insist on their futures"??
Odd that the art seems to reflect a Harry Potter sensibility, given the condemnation of Rowling by the trans mob.
Anyway, I also learn from her twitter feed that "anti-coloniser" academia also really, really hates it when any body dares tries to make "acknowledgement of country" a bit less, well, exclusive:
For what it's worth, here's where I am at on such matters:
a. I have felt for some time that moving Australia Day is a good idea, given that Australia wasn't created in any sense on 26 January. And yeah, I can see the indigenous objection to the use of that day.
b. I've never been a fan of "welcome to country" and acknowledgements of traditional land, considering they have become overused and are deployed in some pretty obviously insincere ways. (Such as pretending that "emerging elders" have much to tell certain organisations about certain things. I always think this when listening to the acknowledgement given at QPAC performances.) It has become a "political flex", too - and far from sending any message of reconciliation and unity, sends a message of disunity and power seeking.
As such, it may be something Right wingers started, but if a Council seeks to "balance things up" somewhat, as in that Council statement, I think that's not a bad thing.
c. Aboriginal politics is moving in the wrong direction, being based purely on grievance. It is counter-productive - encouraging youth crime and lawlessness due to teaching them that the "colonisers" deserve only distrust and hatred and that all current social problems are their fault. That's no way to get your people fully integrated into modern society with all the benefits that can come from that.
No comments:
Post a Comment