%20_%20X.png)
Update: Of course, he is also going to swallow entirely the line, when Trump loses, that it must have been due to cheating, because (he will claim) the polls and betting market showed a Trump landslide. The New York Times discusses the obvious:
The torrent of polls began arriving just a few weeks ago, one after the other, most showing a victory for Donald J. Trump.
They stood out amid the hundreds of others indicating a dead heat in the presidential election. But they had something in common: They were commissioned by right-leaning groups with a vested interest in promoting Republican strength.
These surveys have had marginal, if any, impact on polling averages, which either do not include the partisan polls or give them little weight. Yet some argue that the real purpose of partisan polls, along with other expectation-setting metrics such as political betting markets, is directed at a different goal entirely: building a narrative of unstoppable momentum for Mr. Trump.
The partisan polls appear focused on lifting Republican enthusiasm before the election and — perhaps more important — cementing the idea that the only way Mr. Trump can lose to Vice President Kamala Harris is if the election is rigged. Polls promising a Republican victory, the theory runs, could be held up as evidence of cheating if that victory does not come to pass.
3 comments:
he always was an ignorant goose
What’s this idea of falling for the line? You thickos think that an election spike is mathematically possible? Not the sharpest tools in the shed. You John speak up? Voting spikes in the early hours of the morning? Mathematically possible or not?
In unrigged elections you have voting SWINGS. You do not have, nor can you have, voting spikes. You have had four years to get this right.
A non-entity Indian lady brought up in Canada is going up against a United ticket involving Trump, Robert Kennedy, Tulsi and Elon Musk. The Democrats will of course cheat but there is just no indication of a full blown. balls to the wall colour revolution like last time. So if you think Kamala can win, I just have no idea where you are getting this from. Yes she was ahead for a short time but that media puffery is ephemeral. Kennedy, Tulsi and Musk have serious agendas they need to get done and the other side is a vision free zone.
Post a Comment