All it takes is for the executive to think it doesn't have to obey the courts, and for a craven Congress to shrug its shoulders.
I wonder at what point someone in the military feels they have to intervene, because it's kinda starting to look like that is what it would take.
Or does it only need something to get to the Supreme Court and for it to say "executive, no, you can't ignore the courts, if you want constitutional government"?
The trouble with that is, if it is a majority statement, with a few of the corrupt MAGA supporters not joining in, Trump and Vance would likely say its an illegitimate, political, decision.
As for the matter of the ease of constitutional crisis, I guess some Australian readers would say "well, the sacking of Whitlam was easy too." Which is true. But compared to the possible problems of how to deal with a rogue President in the US, our system at least democratically resolved it quickly and neatly.
8 comments:
He still hasn't done anything about the cost of living, housing, and labour shortages. So much of this has a distraction squirrel quality to it. Trump knows little about everything so I'm not surprised he doesn't see the constitutional issues but Vance should know better.
There is no crisis. The court can make its judgement. Andrew Jackson can thank them for their judgement, and explain why he disagrees. Now that’s a fact. And Trump and his legal team can do the same.
How many artillery divisions does the Supreme Court have? These are co-equal branches. The court DOES NOT hold rank.
You fucking moron. He went to work on that with spending cuts day one. John there is something ficking wrong with you. Reducing the deficit is stopping the rise in cost of living.
The other thing you could do is arrest Larry Fink and sell off Blackrock assets. But reducing the deficit is what you need to do for cost of living issues first.
You idiot, the deficit is so large and the savings to date so small there is no impact on COL. Learn some Econ moron.
And this fellow isn’t even a Supreme Court judge. You have to be fucking kidding me Steve. Some low level New York Jew is going to start ordering Andrew Jackson around? Or Trump after you guys tried to kill him and failed?
You gotta wake up. Not every day is Jew boy day any more.
I fucking had an economics degree when I was 19 you moron. Now you can glut the middle rise housing market, you can apply antitrust to break up all these massive asset holders, but the first thing to do is slash spending and that’s an all hands on deck affair. Every dollar counts.
The authority fallacy is for weaklings. Economics is a woeful discipline, incapable of making predictions and littered with ridiculous assumptions. You chose the wrong degree idiot. Business people I know regard economists with contempt. Your behavior explains that. Your the type of dumbass who thinks he has solutions for everything. That's why you have achieved nothing.
Economics is good if you actually understand it doofus. You could nationalise and expand the railways and revive water transport around the Great Lakes area. You could make the rivers navigateable and build more wharves. You could glut the grid with nuclear power.
But while all these can cut costs they take time and money. So again the first step to dealing with living costs is cutting spending. ALWAYS. No exceptions ever.
Post a Comment