If Bolton has any influence, everyone seems to think there'll be a much, much higher chance of American nukes flying off during a Trump presidency:
And I see that anti-tariff economics adviser Gary Cohn is said to be resigning.
Things getting much grimmer in the White House...
Update: speaking of ranting men, you'd think Nassim Taleb might find time to occasionally make a critical comment on Trump's economics, but on his Twitter feed, he very, very rarely makes any comment on him at all.
Wednesday, March 07, 2018
A worthy Krugman
Been a while since I recommended a Krugman column, but this one "A Ranting Old Guy With Nukes" is pretty good. (And Mother Jones notes an attempt to nitpick it by Kevin Williamson, which fails.)
Tuesday, March 06, 2018
Forgotten subway
In an article that explains that American governments are getting too carried away with the unproved technology of hyperloop, I found this bit:
The things you learn...
There is reason to think high-speed vacuum-tube transportation can work, at least on paper. (A pneumatic subway briefly opened beneath Manhattan in 1870.)Wikipedia has an entry about that short lived, short length, pneumatic subway, and it also notes that a similar novelty subway was built before that at the Crystal Palace in London.
The things you learn...
Prophetting in Africa
Seems I have missed the rise of "Prophet" Shepherd Bushiri in Africa:
Now I have to go look at the video which shows him walking on air. [Done - and I don't think I will bother sharing it. I see he has been a thing for a few years now, and been the subject of skepticism within Africa too. Good.]
On a regular Sunday, about 40,000 people will gather to hear the Prophet preach, and potentially pick up some of the specially designed merchandise on sale at stalls dotted around the large church complex - anything from "miracle oil", calendars and wrist bands, to branded towels, T-shirts and caps, all emblazoned with his face.
Now I have to go look at the video which shows him walking on air. [Done - and I don't think I will bother sharing it. I see he has been a thing for a few years now, and been the subject of skepticism within Africa too. Good.]
Blockchain skepticism in detail
When it comes to reading the stuff being put out by Berg, Davidson and Potts (key line - don't get too distracted by Bitcoin, the real revolution coming is glorious blockchain) I've never got over the feeling that it was pretty vacuous waffle that didn't make much sense.
Hence it gives me pleasure to read this great piece of blockchain skepticism by Roubini and Byrne in The Guardian today. They make clear much of what I always thought was obvious, yet seems to never be addressed (or at least, in a way I can understand) in the RMIT conference machine material.
Hence it gives me pleasure to read this great piece of blockchain skepticism by Roubini and Byrne in The Guardian today. They make clear much of what I always thought was obvious, yet seems to never be addressed (or at least, in a way I can understand) in the RMIT conference machine material.
Monday, March 05, 2018
Strange choices
Have the Oscars become unimportant because the Academy has become more and more peculiar in its choices? It would seem that the big winner (so far, I was just watching some of it during my lunch) is The Shape of Water, the "adult fairy tale" featuring a sexy love story between a woman and what looks like a slightly more human Creature from the Black Lagoon.
Being underwhelmed by the director's Pan's Labyrinth, and given the nature of the story, I am in no hurry to watch this movie at all. As, I suspect, is most of the public. I see now that it had a December release in the USA, and has made a relatively paltry $57 million. (I'm surprised it made that much.)
I am particularly miffed that Shape took the award for best score, when I had predicted that Dunkirk should definitely get it.
Update: yes, it won best picture. Ugh.
At some point, hopefully if it is free on a streaming service, I will watch it hoping to confirm my anticipatory dislike.
Update 2: I hadn't really bothered to read reviews of it before, but I see that Rex Reed wrote one with the pleasing title ‘The Shape of Water’ Is a Loopy, Lunkheaded Load of Drivel.'
Being underwhelmed by the director's Pan's Labyrinth, and given the nature of the story, I am in no hurry to watch this movie at all. As, I suspect, is most of the public. I see now that it had a December release in the USA, and has made a relatively paltry $57 million. (I'm surprised it made that much.)
I am particularly miffed that Shape took the award for best score, when I had predicted that Dunkirk should definitely get it.
Update: yes, it won best picture. Ugh.
At some point, hopefully if it is free on a streaming service, I will watch it hoping to confirm my anticipatory dislike.
Update 2: I hadn't really bothered to read reviews of it before, but I see that Rex Reed wrote one with the pleasing title ‘The Shape of Water’ Is a Loopy, Lunkheaded Load of Drivel.'
Hero revisionism
Reading this story gives a good picture of how terrifying being involved in a US school shoot up must be for both students and teachers.
In brief - at least a couple of Florida students are saying that a teacher formerly called a hero in the media didn't seem very heroic to them when they were caught in the corridor and he (perhaps following procedure technically correctly?) refused to let them back in the classroom.
I'm not sure who's right or wrong, to be honest, but you can imagine that causing some disruption in the school for some time afterwards.
In brief - at least a couple of Florida students are saying that a teacher formerly called a hero in the media didn't seem very heroic to them when they were caught in the corridor and he (perhaps following procedure technically correctly?) refused to let them back in the classroom.
I'm not sure who's right or wrong, to be honest, but you can imagine that causing some disruption in the school for some time afterwards.
Opioids can cause extra pain - huh
I didn't know this. From the start of an article at NPR:
Turns out it is still not well understood. Read the whole thing.
When patients arrive in the emergency room, nearly all but those with the most minor complaints get an IV.
To draw blood, give medications or administer fluids, the IV is the way doctors and nurses gain access to the body. Putting one in is quick and simple, and it's no more painful than a mild bee sting.
Yet for some patients, this routine procedure becomes excruciating. On my shifts as an emergency physician, I began to notice a strange pattern. These hypersensitive patients often had a history of using opioids.
Shouldn't these patients be less susceptible to pain, instead of more so?
As I looked into it, I found that I was far from the first to notice the paradox of heightened pain sensitivity with opioid use. An English physician in 1870 reported on morphine's tendency to "encourage the very pain it pretends to relieve." In 1880, a German doctor named Rossbach described a similar hypersensitivity to pain with opioid dependence.
A century passed before the phenomenon received serious scientific attention.
Turns out it is still not well understood. Read the whole thing.
Sunday, March 04, 2018
Disliking Stephen King
My son wanted to watch the recent movie version of Stephen King's It.
Now, as I may have mentioned before, I have found one - just one - adaptation of Stephen King material which I liked: The Shining. And I like that a lot. But from what I have read, it's almost in spite of the novel that it turned out to be a great movie. (King himself doesn't like it!) But every other King inspired mini series or movie I've seen has not impressed. I didn't even care for Stand by Me, his (only?) non horror work, when I saw it at the cinema decades ago. (Too much overwrought acting, and characters that I don't recall being all that sympathetic.)
So, would this reasonably well received movie change my mind - especially since I had not watched the earlier adaptation of it, and was therefore coming to it without preconceptions.
No. A hundred times no.
Look, I know you have to make allowances for certain conventions in ghost or horror stories - the most obvious being nervous people walking into darkened rooms/haunted houses/sewer systems that look more appropriate for New York than a country town, when every normal person would run away or at least go in prepared - but it can be pushed so far that it just becomes ridiculous, and so it is, repeatedly, in this movie.
Apart from that, was King himself bullied at school and dislike his parents, because now that I think of it, meanness of kids to other kids, and incompetent or nasty parents, seems to be a feature of a lot of his stories. The kid on kid meanness is a very big component in this movie, but it doesn't seem to have any context. It's just there.
The movie reminded me at times of the two other King movies mentioned above - but the use of gushing blood in this one was (sorry to use the word again) ridiculous, as to opposed to malevolent, as it was in The Shining.
Overall, I found it an unpleasant, silly and non-scary story - so very conventional in the way the scary music would start, and even managing jump scares which didn't scare.
And it convinces more than ever that King is a puzzlingly over-rated creative force.
Now, as I may have mentioned before, I have found one - just one - adaptation of Stephen King material which I liked: The Shining. And I like that a lot. But from what I have read, it's almost in spite of the novel that it turned out to be a great movie. (King himself doesn't like it!) But every other King inspired mini series or movie I've seen has not impressed. I didn't even care for Stand by Me, his (only?) non horror work, when I saw it at the cinema decades ago. (Too much overwrought acting, and characters that I don't recall being all that sympathetic.)
So, would this reasonably well received movie change my mind - especially since I had not watched the earlier adaptation of it, and was therefore coming to it without preconceptions.
No. A hundred times no.
Look, I know you have to make allowances for certain conventions in ghost or horror stories - the most obvious being nervous people walking into darkened rooms/haunted houses/sewer systems that look more appropriate for New York than a country town, when every normal person would run away or at least go in prepared - but it can be pushed so far that it just becomes ridiculous, and so it is, repeatedly, in this movie.
Apart from that, was King himself bullied at school and dislike his parents, because now that I think of it, meanness of kids to other kids, and incompetent or nasty parents, seems to be a feature of a lot of his stories. The kid on kid meanness is a very big component in this movie, but it doesn't seem to have any context. It's just there.
The movie reminded me at times of the two other King movies mentioned above - but the use of gushing blood in this one was (sorry to use the word again) ridiculous, as to opposed to malevolent, as it was in The Shining.
Overall, I found it an unpleasant, silly and non-scary story - so very conventional in the way the scary music would start, and even managing jump scares which didn't scare.
And it convinces more than ever that King is a puzzlingly over-rated creative force.
In nerdy construction news...
Hey, look what I saw yesterday:
Why's this interesting? Because it's the start of the 10 level office building being built in Brisbane using engineered wood. (OK, well there's concrete involved at the bottom, obviously, but most of it is meant to be wood.)
I wrote about it in previous posts here and here. Interesting, no? (It just is, shut up.)
Why's this interesting? Because it's the start of the 10 level office building being built in Brisbane using engineered wood. (OK, well there's concrete involved at the bottom, obviously, but most of it is meant to be wood.)
I wrote about it in previous posts here and here. Interesting, no? (It just is, shut up.)
Saturday, March 03, 2018
In more Trump tariff news...
* Yes, another network confirms what Jonathan Swan told us the other day - that Trump was going off his nut on the night he decided to start a trade war. (Maybe Kelly made sure the nuclear codes were kept out of the room for a few hours.):
* If you look up Scott Adams on twitter, you will see that not only is he claiming that Trump making decisions irrationally is actually a good "negotiating" tactic (left unsaid is who he is actually "negotiating" with when it comes to tariff wars); he's now on board with the Seth Rich conspiracy. Funny how Adams doesn't seem to realise that chatting into his webcam every day makes him look like a loser talking to himself. (Yes, I know, he does have live viewers during these pieces, but it still makes him look like what he almost certainly is - an eccentric lonely looser with no real friends, even if he does have squillions.)
According to two officials, Trump's decision to launch a potential trade war was born out of anger at other simmering issues and the result of a broken internal process that has failed to deliver him consensus views that represent the best advice of his team.* I am waiting for the Steve Kates, Trump sycophant extraordinaire, to explain to the world why it's actually not a bad idea idea at all. Or is that a challenge too far even for him? (I'm suspecting he'll go with a "but every single other decision Trump has made has been so good, this one won't undo his tremendous legacy.")
On Wednesday evening, the president became "unglued," in the words of one official familiar with the president's state of mind.
* If you look up Scott Adams on twitter, you will see that not only is he claiming that Trump making decisions irrationally is actually a good "negotiating" tactic (left unsaid is who he is actually "negotiating" with when it comes to tariff wars); he's now on board with the Seth Rich conspiracy. Funny how Adams doesn't seem to realise that chatting into his webcam every day makes him look like a loser talking to himself. (Yes, I know, he does have live viewers during these pieces, but it still makes him look like what he almost certainly is - an eccentric lonely looser with no real friends, even if he does have squillions.)
That got old quick
Andrew Bolt, who thinks Gina "if only Australians would work for $2 a day" Rinehart is an economics genius, quotes her praising Trump to the high heavens:
The United States, under President Donald Trump’s leadership, is showing everyone they are open for business and investment, and truly on the way to making the USA great again.Whereas Marketwatch notes, post the Trump tariff decision:
The broad-based nature of the tariffs—and the broad-based market reaction—indicate that “investors are not only concerned about this particular action, but also how that’s going to affect the economy in the U.S.,” said James Norman, president of QS Investors, in a phone interview....
Domestic U.S. steel prices were already up 20% since the beginning of the year in anticipation of possible tariffs, said Andrew Hunter, U.S. economist at Capital Economics, in a note. That’s a big potential drag on steel consumers in the machinery, motor vehicle and construction industries, he said, observing that the tariffs could, ironically, raise the incentive for those manufacturers to move production offshore to avoid the tariffs.
Friday, March 02, 2018
Giving thanks
A few things to be grateful for:
* Mussels (they featured in a very nice pasta meal last night, thanks to wife)
* Taylors wine (one of those wineries that I don't buy all that often, but when I do, they just never seem to put a foot wrong - and yes, I drank a glass last night with the mussels.)
* Yeast. Too many reasons to mention, apart from its role in last night's glass of wine, but here's one I didn't know til yesterday:
* Mussels (they featured in a very nice pasta meal last night, thanks to wife)
* Taylors wine (one of those wineries that I don't buy all that often, but when I do, they just never seem to put a foot wrong - and yes, I drank a glass last night with the mussels.)
* Yeast. Too many reasons to mention, apart from its role in last night's glass of wine, but here's one I didn't know til yesterday:
Both cocoa and coffee beans undergo a fermentation step after their harvest, where yeasts munch on sugars surrounding the beans. Bacteria also play a role in this process, and the yeast leaves behind flavor compounds that make it into the final coffee and chocolate. Researchers have found that cocoa beans in yeast-free fermentation are left with an acidic, off flavor, and that certain yeasts can lend coffee caramel notes.
A bit like a Philip K Dick story, with fewer androids
Some people have the strangest lives. This story at BBC is about a woman who was the victim of what might be called a high functioning but delusional parent is pretty remarkable.
Not very surprising
When nuclear power goes wrong, it really goes wrong. Local contamination around Fukushima is probably worse than first thought:
The team says that, for the first time, the fallout of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor fuel debris into the surrounding environment has been "explicitly revealed" by the study.Update: more news along similar lines, from The Japan Times:
The scientists have been looking at extremely small pieces of debris, known as micro-particles, which were released into the environment during the initial disaster in 2011. The researchers discovered uranium from nuclear fuel embedded in or associated with caesium-rich micro particles that were emitted from the plant's reactors during the meltdowns. The particles found measure just five micrometres or less; approximately 20 times smaller than the width of a human hair. The size of the particles means humans could inhale them.
The reactor debris fragments were found inside the nuclear exclusion zone, in paddy soils and at an abandoned aquaculture centre, located several kilometres from the nuclear plant.
It was previously thought that only volatile, gaseous radionuclides such as caesium and iodine were released from the damaged reactors. Now it is becoming clear that small, solid particles were also emitted, and that some of these particles contain very long-lived radionuclides; for example, uranium has a half-life of billions of years.
In the wake of the 2011 nuclear crisis, radiation levels at homes and areas nearby in a Fukushima village remain around three times higher than the government target despite cleanup work having been performed, an environmental group has said.
In some areas of the village of Iitate and the town of Namie, levels of radioactivity detected at some points among tens of thousands checked in surveys last September and October were higher than they had been the previous year, Greenpeace Japan said in a report released Thursday.
Most of the six houses surveyed in Iitate, located around 40 kilometers northwest of the crippled Fukushima No. 1 complex, logged radiation levels higher than the government-set target of 0.23 microsieverts per hour, ranging from 0.2 to 0.8 microsieverts per hour.
Some areas in the village had seen radiation levels rise from 2016, Greenpeace said. “There is a possibility (the environment) was contaminated again as radioactive materials that had accumulated in nearby forests may have moved around,” it said.
Is it just me, or...?
...does it seem that Nassim Taleb might have some decent ideas, but I can't be bothered working out what they are because:
a. he seems incapable of putting anything succinctly, and
b. if twitter is any guide, he spends such a large part of every day angrily denouncing and ridiculing other people (in any field) as being idiots that he genuinely seems to have psychological problems.
a. he seems incapable of putting anything succinctly, and
b. if twitter is any guide, he spends such a large part of every day angrily denouncing and ridiculing other people (in any field) as being idiots that he genuinely seems to have psychological problems.
Just luck
I haven't read the paper, which is on arXiv, but here's the abstract:
The largely dominant meritocratic paradigm of highly competitive Western cultures is rooted on the belief that success is due mainly, if not exclusively, to personal qualities such as talent, intelligence, skills, efforts or risk taking. Sometimes, we are willing to admit that a certain degree of luck could also play a role in achieving significant material success. But, as a matter of fact, it is rather common to underestimate the importance of external forces in individual successful stories. It is very well known that intelligence or talent exhibit a Gaussian distribution among the population, whereas the distribution of wealth - considered a proxy of success - follows typically a power law (Pareto law). Such a discrepancy between a Normal distribution of inputs, with a typical scale, and the scale invariant distribution of outputs, suggests that some hidden ingredient is at work behind the scenes. In this paper, with the help of a very simple agent-based model, we suggest that such an ingredient is just randomness. In particular, we show that, if it is true that some degree of talent is necessary to be successful in life, almost never the most talented people reach the highest peaks of success, being overtaken by mediocre but sensibly luckier individuals. As to our knowledge, this counterintuitive result - although implicitly suggested between the lines in a vast literature - is quantified here for the first time. It sheds new light on the effectiveness of assessing merit on the basis of the reached level of success and underlines the risks of distributing excessive honors or resources to people who, at the end of the day, could have been simply luckier than others. With the help of this model, several policy hypotheses are also addressed and compared to show the most efficient strategies for public funding of research in order to improve meritocracy, diversity and innovation.A sort of comforting thought, for people of modest means. (Also likely to be disliked by the Ayn Rand/libertarian branch of politics.)
The very peculiar Newton
Yes, we all know Newton was a strange dude, with interests in alchemy and esoteric religion, but this review in TLS gives some further insights:
Anyway, there is still more to read at the review.
Newton tends to come across in popular biographies as a prickly and profoundly ornery recluse whose mind was more at home in the heavens than in conversation with his fellow men, let alone women. Some of this is not exactly wrong. Newton prickled all right. Even as a child, growing up at Woolsthorpe Manor in rural Lincolnshire during the English Civil War and the early years of the Commonwealth, he threatened to set his mother and stepfather on fire and “burn the house over them”.
He was not what you would call a science communicator. The Principia Mathematica, for all its importance as the foundational text of modern mechanics, is written in a fabulously dense and sprawling thicket of Latin that makes the Greek of Euclid’s Elements look positively vulgar. His lecturing style at Cambridge was so wilfully obscure that “ofttimes”, in the words of his early biographer David Brewster, “he did in a manner, for want of hearers, read to the walls”. For a man who professed to despise controversy, Newton feuded like a Homeric hero, dismantling the reputation of Robert Hooke and perhaps even having Hooke’s portrait at the Royal Society destroyed in a final damnatio memoriae....
The jottings in Newton’s copy of a Latin and Greek thesaurus give some impression of his fixations. Under the letter S, he added: Sluggard, Swearer, Sabbath-breaker, Shuhite, Sadducie, Sophister, Schismatick and Sodomite. Under P, he wrote: Pagan, Papist, Pharisie, Philistine, Pelagian and Priscillianist. He policed his own diet for signs of gluttony like a desert father. Another Trinity notebook lists under the heading Otiosa et frustra expensa (“vain and frivolous spending”): cherries, milk, butter, cheese, China ale, tarts and custards.As for his specific religious theories:
It is not clear exactly how or at what point Newton slipped from the Presbyterianism of his Lincolnshire childhood into an idiosyncratic species of Arianism, an ancient school of thought that held Christ had been created by God and was therefore inferior to him. The transformation was certainly complete by the end of the 1670s, though, and there is no good reason to think that Newton had anyone other than himself to blame.I'm pretty sure that's the first time "taut sheep intestines" has appeared in this blog....
By the middle of the following decade, when he gave much of his energies over to alchemy and the decoding of apocalyptic prophecy, he had an even more remarkable idea. When mankind was still young, “before the first memory of things”, Newton surmised, Noah and his sons had come up with a pure and pristine form of worship that subsequent prophets – Christ among them – had contrived only to debase.
The original religion had found its expression in holy flames surrounded by vestal temples such as Stonehenge and St Bridget’s fire, a Christianized pagan observance that persists today in the grounds of Kildare Cathedral in Ireland. These shrines, Newton wrote, stood allegorically for the place of the Sun at the centre of God’s cosmos. Over time, the metaphors had gradually come to obscure the truths they depicted, and as the sacred learning was passed down by Moses and the ancient Egyptians, the prisca sapientia had degenerated into idolatry.
This sort of claim was unusual but not exceptional in Newton’s time. What was extraordinary was his belief that the Noachian faith had embodied a better and truer conception of the universe than anything that came after it. Modern philosophers could only hope to unravel its insights from the tangle of esoteric riddles in which they were preserved....
This conviction led Newton down some strange byways. At one point he defended the account of Egyptian theology in Aristophanes’ The Birds, where Night is said to have spread her black wings over the chaotic void and laid an egg containing Love, which eventually hatched and created all the gods and living things. Night, Newton explained, was the unseen deity, and Love the spirit that had moved over the face of the waters in Genesis 2. He also thought that Plato had ultimately inherited an understanding of universal gravitation from the same source, and that before him Pythagoras had hit on the inverse-square law by hanging hammers of different weights from taut sheep intestines.
Anyway, there is still more to read at the review.
Thursday, March 01, 2018
Man child strikes again
Trump's (dangerously?) bad mood seems partly/primarily to do with Jeff Sessions refusing to resign, and in fact starting to push back on his boss's childish insults:
Last Thursday, Mr. Trump began a meeting attended by Mr. Sessions by saying, “I also want to thank a really tremendous attorney general.” He turned to the person seated next to him and added: “That’s Pam Bondi, from Florida.” Ms. Bondi is Florida’s state attorney general.
Trump problems
Jonathan Swan from Axios, who seems very well connected with the White House, is tweeting that Trump is in a completely foul mood at the moment - to an exceptional degree.
The Entertainer, Part 3 (I think)
Ah, I enjoy reading some of the predictions of this 50-something year old Right wing catastrophist who sings at RSL clubs and outback venues. (Management really should do him a favour and start slipping anti-depressants into the water he sips between songs.)
When will the walk back begin
Everyone expects that there'll be phones calls made and Trump will walk back from his Democrat friendly ramble about guns made at this meeting:
Would love to hear some of the NRA calls being made to Republicans (or to Trump direct) to get him back under control.
In 2016, NRA-endorsed Republican candidate Donald Trump won the presidency after many months of insisting that his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton was going to grab your guns.
In February 2018, President Trump publicly called for a subversion of due process, and for the government to “take the guns first.”
During a televised meeting with lawmakers at the White House on Wednesday afternoon, the president and assembled legislators spent the hour riffing on ideas for securing schools and curtailing gun violence in America. Trump ping-ponged between various policy positions and postures, invariably making unforced interjections that would make his staunchest pro-gun supporters cringe.
When Vice President Mike Pence talked about how those who are a “danger to themselves or others” should have their firearms taken away, but also afforded due process, the president jumped in to one-up Pence.
“Or, Mike, take the firearms first, and then go to court,” Trump said, breaking with his own vice president on live TV. “Because that's another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures.”
The president continued, sounding like the gun-grabbing Democrats he’d once warned against: “I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida… To go to court would have taken a long time. So you could do exactly what you're saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.”
Would love to hear some of the NRA calls being made to Republicans (or to Trump direct) to get him back under control.
Tiny thing makes big discovery
I was listening to Fran Kelly on Radio National this morning talking to the CSIRO guy who designed the tiny radio telescope that made this big discovery. (It made up for having to listen to a full ten minutes an hour earlier on the wonders of women's team sports - Fran Kelly's personal interests surely results in the most disproportionate coverage of that topic on any radio station in the world.)
Anyway, this is the story:
And this is the tiny telescope:
Anyway, this is the story:
Astronomers have for the first time spotted long-sought signals of light from the earliest stars ever to form in the Universe — around 180 million years after the Big Bang.
The signal is a fingerprint left on background radiation by hydrogen that absorbed some of this primordial light. The evidence hints that the gas that made up the early Universe was colder than predicted. This, physicists say, is a possible sign of dark matter’s influence. If confirmed, the discovery could mark the first time that dark matter has been detected through anything other than its gravitational effects.
“This is the first time we’ve seen any signal from this early in the Universe, aside from the afterglow of the Big Bang,” says Judd Bowman, an astronomer at Arizona State University in Tempe who led the work, which is published in Nature1 on 28 February. “If it’s true, this is major news,” says Saleem Zaroubi, a cosmologist at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Other teams will need to confirm the signal but, so far, the finding seems to be robust, he says. “It’s very exciting stuff. This is a period in the Universe’s history we know very little about.”
And this is the tiny telescope:
Expect more of this
Just as Republicans in Florida started legislation for this:
....over in Georgia, this happened:
The goal: 10 marshals (teachers trained to carry a gun) in every
school, which would equate to 37,000 statewide. The state would cover
the costs of background checks, drug testing, psychological exams and
132 hours of training. The bill does provide a one-time $500 stipend for
those who volunteer to have a gun.
The bill also calls for spending $400 million to put a school resource
officer in every school, improve mental health counseling and make
public school buildings safer.
A social studies teacher barricaded himself inside a classroom at a Georgia high school on Wednesday and fired a handgun once in what may have been a warning shot, authorities said.Actually, there is much skepticism on Twitter about the Florida plan because of the increase in teacher's liability cover it would guarantee. Yes, covering a school/teacher for accidentally shooting a student is likely to increase premiums, I would expect...
No students were in the classroom at the time, and the only injury reported was a student who hurt her ankle running when Dalton High School was evacuated.
The teacher, Jesse Randal Davidson, was taken into custody without incident after a 30- to 45-minute standoff with officers, Dalton police spokesman Bruce Frazier said. Davidson, 53, serves as the play-by-play announcer for the high school’s football team, police said in a tweet .
Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Who knew that dating a politician could be so lucrative?
I think this is not going to go over well with the general public; except that presumably Labor figures have done the same thing and so will not be inclined to promote outrage:
But since when does any job, private or public, carry such side benefits for a (for want of a better term) boyfriend or girlfriend who hasn't reached the heights of "de facto partner" yet?:
Julie Bishop has claimed $32,000 in taxpayer-funded family travel for her long-term boyfriend but says she is not obliged to disclose his financial interests on the parliamentary register because he is not her "spouse" or de facto partner.Apparently, they live in separate cities, and have been an item since 2014.
But since when does any job, private or public, carry such side benefits for a (for want of a better term) boyfriend or girlfriend who hasn't reached the heights of "de facto partner" yet?:
Ms Bishop has claimed $32,000 in taxpayer-funded travel for him between 2015 and 2017. Ms Bishop nominated him as her designated family member in 2015 which entitles him to free domestic airfares and Comcar rides under the allowance granted to MPs for family reunification. These benefits can be bestowed by an MP on almost anyone and are disclosed in Department of Finance records.
Ms Bishop has previously said she began dating Mr Panton in early 2014. Photographs of the pair published since then show they regularly attend social events such as the Melbourne Cup, Portsea Polo and sporting grand finals, and meet with celebrities abroad.In the first six months of 2015, Mr Panton claimed nearly $10,000 in flights and car rides, including more than $3000 in flights to and from Perth on the same weekend Ms Bishop declared on her pecuniary interests that she had received free tickets to the Leeuwin Estate Concert in Margaret River. The pair were photographed attending the event together.
Nothing a year's sleep wouldn't help
Gee, the head of the National Security Agency, Admiral Michael Rogers, looks like he hasn't slept a wink since Trump became President. Here he is, telling a Senate committee that his Manchurian candidate President hasn't told him to do anything in particular about Russian cyberattacks:
Apart from the incredible bags under the eyes, he looks relatively young - he's a year older than me but not a sign of grey hair at the temples?
Apart from the incredible bags under the eyes, he looks relatively young - he's a year older than me but not a sign of grey hair at the temples?
Why sacrifice?
The Atlantic has an article looking at the matter of human sacrifice; why it was a "thing", and why it stopped.
A pretty interesting topic, with no clear answers. Seems that some anthropologists argue that it only worked as a social control factor for a society that stayed relatively small - under 100,000 people, say. Above that, it became de-stablising.
Others argue it went out of fashion as religion improved, so to speak:
A pretty interesting topic, with no clear answers. Seems that some anthropologists argue that it only worked as a social control factor for a society that stayed relatively small - under 100,000 people, say. Above that, it became de-stablising.
Others argue it went out of fashion as religion improved, so to speak:
But though sheer military might may have been the underlying cause of the disappearance of human sacrifice, the members of the victorious societies likely didn’t see it that way. They probably saw the rejection of human sacrifice as a logical extension of the golden rule, or as a religious imperative. The Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker has argued that societies became less violent as they became better at abstract reasoning. In other words, people spurned violence against others on the grounds that they wouldn’t want it done to them. Turchin and colleagues disagree: With staggering frequency, they argue, it was religion rather than reason that turned people away from ritualized brutality. But a different kind of religion—one that deified not a mortal god-king, but a supernatural “big god.” These were the forerunners of today’s major world religions, and those who spread them railed against human sacrifice. “They basically said, God is repelled by this,” says Turchin.
These new religions—such as Judaism and Zoroastrianism—were born roughly during the first millennium B.C., and though they have yet to prove it, the Seshat group suspects that they provided the social glue that allowed societies to reach newly intricate heights. Without these religions, the researchers think, the complexifying process would have stalled long before it produced the nation-states and multistate federations of today.
Staying classy
In today's list of classy politicians in the news - Michaella Cash:
Innovation and Jobs Minister Michaelia Cash has repeatedly threatened to name "every young woman" in Bill Shorten's office that she has heard rumours about in an extraordinary row at Senate estimates.
Responding to repeated demands by Labor Senator Doug Cameron to name her new chief of staff, Senator Cash shot back that that was a "dangerous road" he was walking.
"If you want to start discussing staff matters be very, very careful. Because I'm happy to sit here and name every young woman in Mr Shorten's office about which rumours in this place abound.
Update: I see that Tim Blair, who my blog roll is about to move to the "gone completely stupid and offensive" category along with Bolt, seems to think it was a good bit of "calling out" of Labor's "moral grandstanding". An idiotic take on the matter, given the way Labor was careful to chase Joyce on entitlements only. (Has Blair noted that even Abbott this afternoon said it was a brain snap that shouldn't have happened? Has any Coalition member defended it?)
And David Leyonhjelm - retweeting a crap wingnut meme from Prison Planet:
And David Leyonhjelm - retweeting a crap wingnut meme from Prison Planet:
Leyonhjelm apparently doesn't believe in Googling wingnut memes before passing them on - this one was debunked at Snopes.
Zero pity felt
Have you heard about this? Poisonous radio conspiracist nutjob Alex Jones (who has long promoted "false flag" and "crisis actor" conspiracies after major shootings) is pleading for student activist David Hogg (whose face, by the way, keeps reminding me of a young Christian Bale) to help him not be banned by Youtube.
The twitter reactions are pretty funny.
The twitter reactions are pretty funny.
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
That troublesome Chinese belief
I complained once before that one of the worst things to come out of China (or Asia more generally?) is the belief that certain animal parts carry certain health benefits. (I keep thinking there must be a single word for that, but what is it?) Nature reports:
The jaguar was found floating in a drainage canal in Belize City, Belize, on the day after Christmas last year. Its body was mostly intact, but the head was missing its fangs. On 10 January, a second cat — this time, an ocelot that may have been mistaken for a young jaguar — turned up headless in the same channel.Does no one at the top of Chinese government (hello, dictator elect Xi) think that it might be useful to have a government backed campaign to stop the population believing in quasi magical "traditional medicine", at least if it involves animal parts?
The killings point to a growing illicit trade in jaguars (Panthera onca) that disturbs wildlife experts. The cats’ fangs, skulls and hides have long been trophies for Latin American collectors who flout international prohibitions against trading in jaguar parts. But in recent years, a trafficking route has emerged to China, where the market for jaguars could be increasing because of crackdowns on the smuggling of tiger parts used in Chinese traditional medicine.
Wildlife trafficking often follows Chinese construction projects in other countries, because Chinese workers can send or take objects home, says ecologist Vincent Nijman of Oxford Brookes University in Oxford, UK. “If there’s a demand [in China] for large-cat parts, and that demand can be fulfilled by people living in parts of Africa, other parts of Asia or South America, then someone will step in to fill that demand,” he says. “It’s often Chinese-to-Chinese trade, but it’s turning global.”
Not just piety on their mind
Well, at least it's good to see it's not just Catholics with problems about how the apparently pious carry on sexually:
#MosqueMeToo Gives Muslim Women A Voice About Sexual Misconduct At Mecca
#MosqueMeToo Gives Muslim Women A Voice About Sexual Misconduct At Mecca
Dressed in a hijab and covered from head to toe, she felt something. Someone — a man — had grabbed onto her butt and would not let go.
The Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, called hajj, was supposed to be the holiest moment of Mona Eltahawy's life. When she was 15, she journeyed there with her family. The magnificence of the Great Mosque had taken her breath away. But that man turned the trip into a nightmare.
Monday, February 26, 2018
If I ruled the world....
....I would ban the internet advertising companies "Taboola" and "Outbrain" and any other that fills up websites with crappy photo links to fake news and stupid ads.
I'm thoroughly sick of them.
I'm thoroughly sick of them.
A bad look
Just what the Church needs right now - monsignors in Rome with child porn and on the prowl in the public squares:
And there's another one under investigation:
A judge on a top Vatican tribunal was given a 14-month suspended sentence by an Italian court for possessing child pornography and sexual molestation. He then resigned his position on the Roman Rota, the tribunal.
According to the Italian newspaper La Stampa, Mgr Pietro Amenta, a judge on the Rota, a court that deals mainly with marriage cases, accepted the terms of plea bargain on February 14....
Mgr Amenta was detained by police in March 2017 after he was accused of fondling an 18-year-old man in a public square in Rome. The young man followed him and called the police, who subsequently took Mgr Amenta into custody, Italian newspapers reported.
And there's another one under investigation:
The other is presumed to be that of Mgr Carlo Capella, a former Vatican diplomat recalled from service in Washington in 2017 shortly after the Vatican was notified by the U.S. Department of State “of a possible violation of laws relating to child pornography images by a member of the diplomatic corps of the Holy See accredited to Washington.”
An arrest warrant was also issued in Canada for Mgr Capella one month later for accessing, possessing and distributing child pornography.
Modern "conservatism"
I see that Max Boot is divorcing himself from the description "conservative", and with excellent reason:
Principled conservativism continues to exist, primarily at small journals of opinion, but it is increasingly disconnected from the stuff that thrills the masses. I remember as a high school student in the 1980s attending a lecture at UCLA by William F. Buckley Jr. I was dazzled by his erudition, wit and oratorical skill. Today, young conservatives flock to the boorish and racist performance art of Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter. The Conservative Political Action Conference couldn’t find room for critics of Trump, save for the brave and booed Mona Charen, but it did showcase French fascist scion Marion Maréchal-Le Pen.That's a pretty good explanation of the situation.
The career of Dinesh D’Souza is indicative of the downward trajectory of conservatism. He made his name with a well-regarded 1991 book denouncing political correctness and championing liberal education. Then he wrote a widely panned 1995 book claiming that racism was no more, and it was all downhill from there. In 2014 he pleaded guilty to breaking campaign finance laws. Now, as the Daily Beast notes, he has become a conspiratorial crank who has suggested that the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville was staged by liberals, that Barack Obama is a “gay Muslim” and Michelle Obama is a man and that Adolf Hitler, who sent 50,000 homosexuals to prison, “was NOT anti-gay.” He managed to sink even lower last week by mocking stunned Parkland school-shooting survivors after the Florida legislature defeated a bill to ban assault weapons: “Worst news since their parents told them to get summer jobs.”
It is hard to imagine anything more cruel and heartless, but for a bottom-feeder like D’Souza it’s all in a day’s work. As he wrote in his 2002 book “Letters to a Young Conservative,” “One way to be effective as a conservative is to figure out what annoys and disturbs liberals the most, and then keep doing it.” (Thanks to Windsor Mann for the quote.) That, in a nutshell, is the credo of today’s high-profile conservatives: Say anything to “trigger” the “libtards” and “snowflakes.” The dumber and more offensive, the better. Whatever it takes to get on (and stay on) Fox News and land the next book contract!
Naturally, just as drug addicts need bigger doses over time, these outrage artists must be ever more transgressive to get the attention they crave. Coulter’s book titles have gone from accusing Bill Clinton of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” to accusing all liberals of “Treason,” of being “Godless” and even “Demonic.” Her latest assault on the public’s intelligence was called “In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome!”
Violence re-visited
Trump recently mentioned violent media after the Florida shooting (yes, I know, more as a diversion from taking action on gun control), but the topic did cross my mind again this weekend when I tried watching two things on Netflix.
First, the (generally) critically well received Mindhunter. [Spoiler follows]. The first episode starts with a hostage situation, and a very sudden and violent gun suicide. It is quick, but done in a way you would never have envisaged as acceptable for TV violence, say, 20 years ago. (Head pretty much blown off like a watermelon.) The rest of the episode was, I thought, strangely bad in other ways. The acting and dialogue seemed remarkably stilted and unnatural - no one seemed quite real. I won't be watching it again.
Then my son was watching The Punisher - first episode perhaps? I came in late, and was skeptical - I am finding I don't like any Marvel TV or streaming shows that I have sampled.
Well, near the end, the hero goes berserk with a construction hammer, killing or maiming I don't know who (baddies, generically, I assume). The scene was graphic and unpleasantly violent in a way that, again, I think media representation just would not have contemplated a relatively short time ago. I see that some people on Reddit and elsewhere have raised questions about the amount of physical violence in the show, so I know I am not alone. There's something about the idea of a hammer to the head, or watching legs being broken, that I find particularly grotesque.
Now, I know - you can carry on about squeamishness about media depiction of violence in many different ways, pointing to a myriad of psychological studies on its effects and their uncertain results, and get into bigger discussions about how civilised society used to consider actual violence (public executions) as public spectacle.
But I just cannot get over the feeling that certain things make common sense:
a. if military training had to evolve to overcome the ordinary soldier's reluctance to kill, surely it's not unreasonable to think that modern, graphic first person shooter games are doing the same job on the minds of at least the mentally unstable, aggressive male who has thoughts about shooting up his school or workplace. (In fact, I would be curious to know whether modern military training finds it's a lot easier to get their new recruits into no guilt shooting these days, given gaming and media depictions of blood and gore.)
b. psychology has hit a crisis of experimental credibility, yet it would seem that it certainly hasn't spread to skepticism about some of the experiments to do with media violence. And when you read what some of the studies do (for example, look at whether players of Grand Theft Auto are just as likely to pick up someone's dropped pen), you really do have to wonder about their value.
c. the relationship between media and gaming violence and real life violence is obviously not simple, otherwise the rate of crime generally would be going up in the US and Australia, rather than downwards as it has been in the last couple of decades. But does that mean there is no relationship between its increase and potential for negative effects on society or individuals? No, I don't think.
d. the depiction of graphic violence is undoubtedly desensitising to the viewing of violence, and how can that be a good thing? To the contrary, isn't it a positive thing that we now find the idea of watching someone's neck being broken in an hanging as a somewhat grotesque interest in watching death; and if so, why shouldn't I be disturbed that some people have no reservation from watching a realistic depiction of a head being blown off by a shot gun? Surely the desensitising to the viewing of a violent act make it easier for a person of the "right" mind frame to imagine carrying it out themselves? The effect may be so marginal as to not reflect in general crime rates, but gee, there are lot of mass shootings happening in the US at the moment.
My negative feelings are intuitive but impossible to shake; and it is so obvious that the graphic depiction of violence is completely unnecessary for a scene to have emotional impact. And emotional impact is different from desensitising. Why risk desensitising someone who should not be desensitised to an act they can contemplate doing themselves, be it a shooting, stabbing or hammer blow to the head?
Why has it become a non issue to Hollywood, gaming and media producers to contemplate the potential effect of their depiction of violence? It is a strangely non-political issue, too - the Left used to deride movies from (say) the 1980's that seemed to espouse Right wing viewpoints as being too violent; but then with the likes of Tarantino and the generally liberal bias of 95% of Hollywood and movie reviewers, and you would have to say that the Left has given up having any moral concerns at all about violence of any kind.
I think reasonable people should be debating why graphic violence is portrayed so readily and frequently these days, and urging creative types to think seriously about it.
Update: I think my last lengthy post about movie violence was this one, from 2012, and I stand by what I said then. I am bothered that the same things now need to be said about Marvel associated Netflix content.
First, the (generally) critically well received Mindhunter. [Spoiler follows]. The first episode starts with a hostage situation, and a very sudden and violent gun suicide. It is quick, but done in a way you would never have envisaged as acceptable for TV violence, say, 20 years ago. (Head pretty much blown off like a watermelon.) The rest of the episode was, I thought, strangely bad in other ways. The acting and dialogue seemed remarkably stilted and unnatural - no one seemed quite real. I won't be watching it again.
Then my son was watching The Punisher - first episode perhaps? I came in late, and was skeptical - I am finding I don't like any Marvel TV or streaming shows that I have sampled.
Well, near the end, the hero goes berserk with a construction hammer, killing or maiming I don't know who (baddies, generically, I assume). The scene was graphic and unpleasantly violent in a way that, again, I think media representation just would not have contemplated a relatively short time ago. I see that some people on Reddit and elsewhere have raised questions about the amount of physical violence in the show, so I know I am not alone. There's something about the idea of a hammer to the head, or watching legs being broken, that I find particularly grotesque.
Now, I know - you can carry on about squeamishness about media depiction of violence in many different ways, pointing to a myriad of psychological studies on its effects and their uncertain results, and get into bigger discussions about how civilised society used to consider actual violence (public executions) as public spectacle.
But I just cannot get over the feeling that certain things make common sense:
a. if military training had to evolve to overcome the ordinary soldier's reluctance to kill, surely it's not unreasonable to think that modern, graphic first person shooter games are doing the same job on the minds of at least the mentally unstable, aggressive male who has thoughts about shooting up his school or workplace. (In fact, I would be curious to know whether modern military training finds it's a lot easier to get their new recruits into no guilt shooting these days, given gaming and media depictions of blood and gore.)
b. psychology has hit a crisis of experimental credibility, yet it would seem that it certainly hasn't spread to skepticism about some of the experiments to do with media violence. And when you read what some of the studies do (for example, look at whether players of Grand Theft Auto are just as likely to pick up someone's dropped pen), you really do have to wonder about their value.
c. the relationship between media and gaming violence and real life violence is obviously not simple, otherwise the rate of crime generally would be going up in the US and Australia, rather than downwards as it has been in the last couple of decades. But does that mean there is no relationship between its increase and potential for negative effects on society or individuals? No, I don't think.
d. the depiction of graphic violence is undoubtedly desensitising to the viewing of violence, and how can that be a good thing? To the contrary, isn't it a positive thing that we now find the idea of watching someone's neck being broken in an hanging as a somewhat grotesque interest in watching death; and if so, why shouldn't I be disturbed that some people have no reservation from watching a realistic depiction of a head being blown off by a shot gun? Surely the desensitising to the viewing of a violent act make it easier for a person of the "right" mind frame to imagine carrying it out themselves? The effect may be so marginal as to not reflect in general crime rates, but gee, there are lot of mass shootings happening in the US at the moment.
My negative feelings are intuitive but impossible to shake; and it is so obvious that the graphic depiction of violence is completely unnecessary for a scene to have emotional impact. And emotional impact is different from desensitising. Why risk desensitising someone who should not be desensitised to an act they can contemplate doing themselves, be it a shooting, stabbing or hammer blow to the head?
Why has it become a non issue to Hollywood, gaming and media producers to contemplate the potential effect of their depiction of violence? It is a strangely non-political issue, too - the Left used to deride movies from (say) the 1980's that seemed to espouse Right wing viewpoints as being too violent; but then with the likes of Tarantino and the generally liberal bias of 95% of Hollywood and movie reviewers, and you would have to say that the Left has given up having any moral concerns at all about violence of any kind.
I think reasonable people should be debating why graphic violence is portrayed so readily and frequently these days, and urging creative types to think seriously about it.
Update: I think my last lengthy post about movie violence was this one, from 2012, and I stand by what I said then. I am bothered that the same things now need to be said about Marvel associated Netflix content.
Sunday, February 25, 2018
Blame the "therapists"
I've always thought that allowing an "emotional support animal" on a plane is a peculiarly American fad, and one that's so silly that it was going to stop soon of its own accord. Hence I haven't really paid it much attention.
I didn't realise that it's become a money making internet thing, too:
I didn't realise that it's become a money making internet thing, too:
The rest of the article is an interview with a psychology researcher who says its not even well established that they are good idea.How is it legal to bring your duck on the plane? Under the federal Air Carrier Access Act, passengers are allowed to bring animals aboard by showing a letter from a mental health clinician or doctor asserting that the pet is part of their therapy. But the law is surprisingly vague about which species can come on board and gives airlines significant discretion. “You are never required to accommodate certain unusual service animals (e.g., snakes, other reptiles, ferrets, rodents, and spiders) as service animals in the cabin,” it reads.Yet as a quick Google search will show, it’s possible to obtain these letters online for a small fee. Some passengers may very well be exploiting the law to bring pets on planes. And stories about peacocks and ducks in booties on planes are increasingly leading ESAs (and their handlers) to be treated as a punchline. In the New York Times, columnist David Leonhardt called the animals a “scam” and “one of the downsides of a modern culture that too often fetishizes individual preference and expression over communal well-being.”
Barely beating not a good sign?
Not sure if I had heard of this before. From a BBC article on body conditions and how they may relate to personality:
For example, I thought Donald Trump's reported heart rate for his age (and with no exercise to speak of) was pretty low: 68bpm. But apparently Obama and (especially) George W Bush had much lower heart rates: 56 and 43 respectively. See this link for the comparisons between them.
Meanwhile, although a low-resting heartbeat is usually considered a sign of good physical health, when it comes to personality, the implications are darker. Several studies have found that a lower resting heart rate correlates with higher psychopathy scores. People who match this description show superficial charm, fearlessness and impulsivity. This is not too surprising considering studies already link low-resting heart rate with aggressive and criminal behaviour. The two main explanations are that low heart rate is a sign of fearlessness and that it can reflect an unpleasant state of being “under aroused”, prompting some psychopathic people to seek relief through violence and conflict. As ever, more research is needed to test these ideas.I'm guessing that there might be a difference between those who have a very low heart rate through dedication to an exercise regime, and those who just have a low rate regardless of exercise.
For example, I thought Donald Trump's reported heart rate for his age (and with no exercise to speak of) was pretty low: 68bpm. But apparently Obama and (especially) George W Bush had much lower heart rates: 56 and 43 respectively. See this link for the comparisons between them.
Tim Blair, get a life, and grow up
This might seem an odd thing for me to lose my temper over, but Tim Blair has become a snide gormless twerp whose shtick is now almost entirely restricted to name calling and attempted take downs of anyone to the Left of him, just for being to the Left of him.
Why should he care that there's an art exhibition of paintings by an executed heroin trafficker? The guy's dead; he sounded (unlike Blair) to have become morally serious before he died. As for his mother:
Or was it just to bring in another (I'm sure he would have referenced this before) snide attack on a Labor politician for being married to a reformed heroin offender? Well, given its Tanya Plibersek's face plastered on the post, with the "hilarious" (sarc) title "An Injection of Culture", yes, that seems to be what this post is about.
What it the Tim Blair take on this? Once a heroin dealer/user, you deserve to either be shot or never employed ever again? Is that the Right line to take on the matter of redemption, or rehabilitation? That it's impossible? And that a woman who marries one, well after his rehabilitation, and goes on to have a family with him, is to be derided for that? Derided for what, for God's sake?
I actually see that he's getting some blowback in comments. And so he should. He should take the post down, the creep.
Update: Just how thoroughly the Plibersek story has been told before is well illustrated in this article from 2015, when she made (I had forgotten) a speech in Parliament decrying the execution of Sukumaran.
That Plibersek, given her life story, should make such a speech is entirely understandable.
That she should still be supporting the cause of the anti-death penalty is entirely understandable.
That Blair should be continuing to deride a drugs rehabilitation success story and his wife is completely absurd, offensive and stupid.
Why should he care that there's an art exhibition of paintings by an executed heroin trafficker? The guy's dead; he sounded (unlike Blair) to have become morally serious before he died. As for his mother:
Seems a bizarrely inappropriate thing for art critic Blair to be paying any heed to.The mother of executed Bali Nine drug smuggler Myuran Sukumaran wants her son's artwork to travel the world as a powerful anti-death penalty message.Speaking to 7.30 for the first time since Sukumaran's death in Indonesia in 2015, Raji Sukumaran said her once staunch-faith in God had been shaken by the execution of her son.
She recalled trying to enjoy her time with him as she watched him painting in prison, first in Bali then on the execution island of Nusakambangan.
Or was it just to bring in another (I'm sure he would have referenced this before) snide attack on a Labor politician for being married to a reformed heroin offender? Well, given its Tanya Plibersek's face plastered on the post, with the "hilarious" (sarc) title "An Injection of Culture", yes, that seems to be what this post is about.
What it the Tim Blair take on this? Once a heroin dealer/user, you deserve to either be shot or never employed ever again? Is that the Right line to take on the matter of redemption, or rehabilitation? That it's impossible? And that a woman who marries one, well after his rehabilitation, and goes on to have a family with him, is to be derided for that? Derided for what, for God's sake?
I actually see that he's getting some blowback in comments. And so he should. He should take the post down, the creep.
Update: Just how thoroughly the Plibersek story has been told before is well illustrated in this article from 2015, when she made (I had forgotten) a speech in Parliament decrying the execution of Sukumaran.
That Plibersek, given her life story, should make such a speech is entirely understandable.
That she should still be supporting the cause of the anti-death penalty is entirely understandable.
That Blair should be continuing to deride a drugs rehabilitation success story and his wife is completely absurd, offensive and stupid.
Saturday, February 24, 2018
Netflix perhaps needs more control?
There's a really savage review at The Guardian about Duncan Jones's latest movie, which is one in a recent string of really poorly reviewed Netflix science fiction/fantasy films (Bright, Cloverfield Paradox, and this one - Mute). I guess I can't blame Netflix for Cloverfield Paradox, which they picked up from another studio that finally decided they didn't want to risk a cinema release, but this review of Mute indicates that the Netflix system seems to be to give director/writers a cheque and hope that they will produce the goods.
If that's correct, it seems that such a system, while sounding like a way to get more interesting and less "cookie cutter" films made, may instead be showing the advantages of more top down intervention by studios - at least if you have people with the right sensibilities at the top.
If that's correct, it seems that such a system, while sounding like a way to get more interesting and less "cookie cutter" films made, may instead be showing the advantages of more top down intervention by studios - at least if you have people with the right sensibilities at the top.
The trouble with white rice
How come I had never heard of the story of the Japanese struggling with beriberi, caused by white rice having thiamine removed from it, right through to the 20th century? Sure, we all know of the British Navy and scurvy, but this story is really much bigger, and one I was unfamiliar with.
Some extracts:
Some extracts:
In 1877, Japan’s Meiji Emperor watched his aunt, the princess Kazu, die of a common malady: kakke. If her condition was typical, her legs would have swollen, and her speech slowed. Numbness and paralysis might have come next, along with twitching and vomiting. Death often resulted from heart failure.The emperor had suffered from this same ailment, on-and-off, his whole life. In response, he poured money into research on the illness. It was a matter of survival: for the emperor, his family, and Japan’s ruling class. While most diseases ravage the poor and vulnerable, kakke afflicted the wealthy and powerful, especially city dwellers. This curious fact gave kakke its other name: Edo wazurai, the affliction of Edo (Edo being the old name for Tokyo). But for centuries, the culprit of kakke went unnoticed: fine, polished, white rice.Gleaming white rice was a status symbol—it was expensive and laborious to husk, hull, polish, and wash. In Japan, the poor ate brown rice, or other carbohydrates such as sweet potatoes or barley. The rich ate polished white rice, often to the exclusion of other foods.This was a problem. Removing the outer layers of a grain of rice also removes one vital nutrient: thiamine, or vitamin B-1. Without thiamine, animals and humans develop kakke, now known in English as beriberi. But for too long, the cause of the condition remained unknown....By 1877, Japan’s beriberi problem was getting really serious. When the princess Kazu died of kakke at 31, it was only a decade after her former husband, Japan’s shogun, had died, almost certainly from the mysterious disease. Machine-milling made polished rice available to the masses, and as the government invested in an army and navy, it fed soldiers with white rice. (White rice, as it happened, was less bulky and lasted longer than brown rice, which could go rancid in warm weather.) Inevitably, soldiers and sailors got beriberi.No longer was this just a problem for the upper class, or even Japan. In his article British India and the “Beriberi Problem,” 1798–1942, David Arnold writes that by the time the emperor was funding research, beriberi was ravaging South and East Asia, especially “soldiers, sailors, plantation labourers, prisoners, and asylum inmates.”
Go read the whole article, at Atlas Obscura, to read about the experiments that found a solution.
One act wonder
A ridiculous, repetitive, zero gravitas narcissistic clown with authoritarian inclinations:
President Trump took full advantage of a boisterous, supportive crowd during his morning speech at CPAC. He chose to return to his campaign trail rhetoric — including a full reading of his favorite immigration allegory, "The Snake" — and prompted the room to break into familiar chants of "lock her up!" and "build the wall!" He clearly relished the environment, asking the crowd at one point if he could "go off script a bit" because the text in his teleprompter was "boring."
Friday, February 23, 2018
And now, the end is near, and so he'll face, the final tea-towel
That heading will make no sense at all in 20 year's time, unless this link still works.
Anyway, Barnaby is giving a press conference in an hour or so's time, and although everyone expects it's to announce his resignation as deputy PM, it would be hilarious if instead he says he's not going anywhere. (Prediction - if the latter, another tale of harassment or affair will emerge within a fortnight.)
Anyway, Barnaby is giving a press conference in an hour or so's time, and although everyone expects it's to announce his resignation as deputy PM, it would be hilarious if instead he says he's not going anywhere. (Prediction - if the latter, another tale of harassment or affair will emerge within a fortnight.)
Just about sums it up...
As seen on twitter:
Update: it occurs to me, if the example of the miserable teacher Arky, who comments regularly at Catallaxy, is anything to go by, you would have to be careful about the mental well being of the teachers being issued guns.
Meanwhile, unsurprisingly, given the American Right friends that he has, I see that Tim Blair thinks teachers having a 9mm pistol is a good idea. Which leads me to suspect that he has little or no experience with pistol use and no idea about their accuracy, range and lethality in comparison to a dude with an AR15 blasting away. (I'm no expert, either, but you only need to try them a couple of times to realise their limitations.)
While it is not inconceivable that a future shooter might be taken down by a pistol shot (most probably, from behind and at close range) - you would think that mass shooting at military bases might give a hint to gun lovers that more guns in the general vicinity of a shooter's target is no disincentive to the start of mass shootings. That "Gun Free Zones" encourage shooters is one of the stupidest arguments that the Right grabs.
The nutter not having a gun in the first place is a much more reliable way to prevent shootings.
Update: it occurs to me, if the example of the miserable teacher Arky, who comments regularly at Catallaxy, is anything to go by, you would have to be careful about the mental well being of the teachers being issued guns.
Meanwhile, unsurprisingly, given the American Right friends that he has, I see that Tim Blair thinks teachers having a 9mm pistol is a good idea. Which leads me to suspect that he has little or no experience with pistol use and no idea about their accuracy, range and lethality in comparison to a dude with an AR15 blasting away. (I'm no expert, either, but you only need to try them a couple of times to realise their limitations.)
While it is not inconceivable that a future shooter might be taken down by a pistol shot (most probably, from behind and at close range) - you would think that mass shooting at military bases might give a hint to gun lovers that more guns in the general vicinity of a shooter's target is no disincentive to the start of mass shootings. That "Gun Free Zones" encourage shooters is one of the stupidest arguments that the Right grabs.
The nutter not having a gun in the first place is a much more reliable way to prevent shootings.
Beetroot to the rescue
Beetroot juice supplements may help enhance exercise capacity in patients with heart failure, according to a new proof-of-concept study. Exercise capacity is a key factor linked to these patients' quality of life and even survival.Here's the link. I do like juices with a large component of beetroot in them. I like fresh, roasted beetroot in salad. I like using the leaves in salad too. That makes it a very versatile vegetable. However, my wife is not so keen, although she does like borscht, which I don't find all that interesting.
However, if the main friction in a family kitchen is over the appropriate use of beetroot, you're not doing too bad.
Who owns guns
Interesting Pew Research Centre report on the demographics of gun ownership in the US. It's quite the while male thing:
It would be good to see an Australian demographic breakup of gun ownership.
White men are especially likely to be gun owners: About half (48%) say they own a gun, compared with about a quarter of white women and nonwhite men (24% each) and 16% of nonwhite women.which probably helps explain why so many at Catallaxy blog own guns too: I don't think it could be any whiter in both posters and commenters.
It would be good to see an Australian demographic breakup of gun ownership.
Thursday, February 22, 2018
Sucking lead
E-cigarettes seem pretty popular with the libertarian crowd, so it is with some degree of schadenfreude that I read they may be dumbing themselves down* by using them:
* One effect of lead: Lead displaces calcium in the reactions that transmit electrical impulses in the brain, which is another way of saying it diminishes your ability to think or recall information, or makes you stupid.
Significant amounts of toxic metals, including lead, leak from some e-cigarette heating coils and are present in the aerosols inhaled by users, according to a study from scientists at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.So, the people who dislike government regulation may have spent the last couple of years sucking down unsafe levels of lead due to lack of regulation. Huh.
In the study, published online in Environmental Health Perspectives on February 21, the scientists examined e-cigarette devices owned by a sample of 56 users. They found that significant numbers of the devices generated aerosols with potentially unsafe levels of lead, chromium, manganese and/or nickel. Chronic inhalation of these metals has been linked to lung, liver, immune, cardiovascular and brain damage, and even cancers.
The Food and Drug Administration has the authority to regulate e-cigarettes but is still considering how to do so. The finding that e-cigarettes expose users—known as vapers—to what may be harmful levels of toxic metals could make this issue a focus of future FDA rules.
* One effect of lead: Lead displaces calcium in the reactions that transmit electrical impulses in the brain, which is another way of saying it diminishes your ability to think or recall information, or makes you stupid.
The mental universe
A short, interesting take here on the matter of quantum theory interpretations, and whether the "mental" is at the bottom of it all. The last paragraph:
The hypothesis here, which I have elaborated upon in detail elsewhere, is that thought—whose characteristic ambiguities may in fact be what quantum superposition states ultimately represent—underlies all nature and isn’t restricted to living organisms. The physical world of an observing organism may arise from an interaction—an interference pattern—between the organism’s thoughts and the thoughts underlying the inanimate universe that surrounds it. Although each organism—in accordance with RQM—may indeed inhabit its own private world of perceptions, all organisms may be surrounded by a common environment of thoughts, which avoids solipsism at least in spirit.
Yet more Black Panther skepticism
First: I call on Jason Soon to tell us what you thought of the movie. [Please].
And then read the skeptical analysis of the race politics of the movie (not so dissimilar from the take on it in Boston Review I posted about before) which has appeared in Esquire. Some bits:
And then read the skeptical analysis of the race politics of the movie (not so dissimilar from the take on it in Boston Review I posted about before) which has appeared in Esquire. Some bits:
When it comes to Killmonger, Black Panther’s politics are not especially liberatory, especially since the film’s title (not to mention its Oakland bookends) evoke the revolutionary politics of Angela Davis, Huey Newton, Elaine Brown, and the Black Panther Party. While often hilariously anti-colonial in characters’ laugh lines, Black Panther’s major plot wants the audience to root for T’Challa largely because as the legitimate male son; he has a respectable blood claim to Wakanda’s throne—and what is a more colonialist ideology than upholding the divine right of kings?....
Killmonger wants to use Wakanda’s weapons to stop the suffering of Black people globally, and we, the audience, are manipulated into rooting against this because we live in an ideology in which nonviolence is always expected of Black people no matter what. As James Baldwin wrote, “The real reason that nonviolence is considered to be a virtue in Negroes… is that white men do not want their lives, their self-image, or their property threatened.” I could not bring myself to root against Killmonger’s desire to help the Black diaspora any more than I could begrudge him wanting to take the throne of his child of the man who’d killed his father.But most disappointing was how Killmonger was morally positioned in contrast to the white CIA agent, Everett Ross (Martin Freeman). Coogler sets up the audience to dislike Killmonger because he was made to kill many people by the U.S. military; meanwhile, after saving a Wakanda woman’s life, Ross was turned into your friendly neighborhood CIA agent. Every scar on Killmonger's hot, shirtless torso is for someone he’s taken out—including many Black people. It is Ross (while using Shuri’s technology) who actually stops Killmonger’s crew from exporting weapons from Wakanda to help Black people....While the audience was positioned not to forgive American-bred violence in Killmonger, we were positioned to forgive it in Agent Ross.The rehabilitation is also a kind of absolution of American imperialism, granting cover to how the CIA (in our Wakanda-less world) has been arming African countries and playing them against each other for decades. Meanwhile, when Killmonger chooses death over help from T’Challa and talks about the middle passage, he doesn’t speak of becoming enslaved in terms of America—but as something the African nation of Wakanda might do to him. It was painful to see Africa and an African American pitted against each other this way, while a CIA agent was redeemed.
Intriguing black hole research
A paper came out in January talking about that old black hole chestnut - the breakdown of physics inside of them, and the cosmic censorship idea that we'd never know about it anyway.
Here's an explanation of the paper from some physics site I'm unfamiliar with, and I'll extract the first couple of paragraphs:
One thought that is not mentioned in either paper - could this potentially tie in, in any way, with the idea that our universe is actually inside of a black hole? If so, could it be a way in which our universe is not deterministic? Just a thought....
Here's an explanation of the paper from some physics site I'm unfamiliar with, and I'll extract the first couple of paragraphs:
Is the future predictable? If we know the initial state of a system exactly, then do the laws of physics determine its state arbitrarily far into the future? In Newtonian mechanics, the answer is yes. Similarly in electromagnetism: if one knows the initial state of the electric and magnetic fields exactly, then Maxwell’s equations determine their state at any later time. In quantum mechanics, if the initial wave function is known exactly, then Schrödinger’s equation can be used to predict the wave function at any later time. However, new research by Vitor Cardoso from the University of Lisbon, Portugal, and colleagues [1] suggests that this predictability of the laws of physics can fail in general relativity. The researchers find that it might be possible for a star that undergoes gravitational collapse to form a black hole containing a region in which physics cannot be predicted from the initial state of the star.Another article trying to explain it (and I suspect, not as accurately) is here.
General relativity asserts that spacetime is dynamical, with its dynamics dictated by Einstein’s equation. Just as the initial state of a particle is specified by its position and velocity, an initial state for spacetime is specified by the geometry of space at some instant of time, as well as by its rate of change. Given such initial data, a fundamental theorem in general relativity [2] states that there is a so-called maximal Cauchy development. This is the largest spacetime that is uniquely determined by the initial data. But is it all of spacetime? In other words, could the maximal Cauchy development be a subset of a larger spacetime? By definition of the maximal Cauchy development, this larger spacetime could not be predicted from the initial data. This scenario would represent a failure of determinism: one would not be able to use the initial data to predict the state of spacetime arbitrarily far into the future.
One thought that is not mentioned in either paper - could this potentially tie in, in any way, with the idea that our universe is actually inside of a black hole? If so, could it be a way in which our universe is not deterministic? Just a thought....
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
Olde time surgery
Everyone gets a laugh out of historical tales of ridiculous self surgery, don't they? From a review of a book that sounds like gory fun:
Um, I assume there was a mirror involved too? Might have to buy the book to find out...
Update: Oh - Wikipedia has an entry on the self-surgeon, who is obviously better know than I kenw. The story first appeared in a book in 1672! I still don't understand how this surgery was done, though. And the assistant scrotum holder in the original is apparently his brother, although it might be that his brother was also an apprentice, I suppose...
Arnold van de Laar, the Dutch surgeon, opens this fascinating history of surgery with the tale of a 17th-century blacksmith who had been so sorely disappointed with the botched operations performed by the scalpel-wielders of his day that he took matters into his own hands and cut a 4oz stone from his own bladder while his wife was at the shops.
Today, with decent hygiene, bladder stones are rare, but then they were rife. From a simple urine infection, they would grow like pearls inside oysters, pressing on the sensors that prompt urination while impeding the act. Hippocrates, the father of medicine, would have counselled any doctor against attempting to remove one, as the operation was more likely to kill the patient than the stone itself. But the pain drove sufferers to seek the relief offered by professional "cutters", even though the procedure had a 40pc mortality rate.
It was only after two cutters had failed to remove 30-year-old Jan de Doot's stone that he decided to do it himself. He made a surgical knife in his own forge, then instructed his apprentice to hold his scrotum out of the way as he made three, deep horizontal slits in his own perineum, and extracted a stone larger than a chicken's egg. De Doot succeeded where the experts had failed, and became famous for his extreme DIY.
Update: Oh - Wikipedia has an entry on the self-surgeon, who is obviously better know than I kenw. The story first appeared in a book in 1672! I still don't understand how this surgery was done, though. And the assistant scrotum holder in the original is apparently his brother, although it might be that his brother was also an apprentice, I suppose...
Oh, please
I also can't stop reading breathless, ecstatic commentary on how Black Panther is going to change everything. Latest example, in Slate: What Black Panther could mean for the Afrofuturism Movement.
Apparently, watching fantasy physics about fantasy materials is going to encourage black kids to get into STEM. OK, I might have to concede Star Trek might have had an influence on making science education cool, but Marvel level fantasy physics having the same effect? Can't see it.
And most of the article just reads like fantasy to me.
Apparently, watching fantasy physics about fantasy materials is going to encourage black kids to get into STEM. OK, I might have to concede Star Trek might have had an influence on making science education cool, but Marvel level fantasy physics having the same effect? Can't see it.
And most of the article just reads like fantasy to me.
Hard to avoid watching the car wreck
That's how I feel about reading about the Right wing reaction to the latest mass shooting in America - it pretty much nauseates me as offensive both to reason and emotion, but can't stop looking.
The latest: as Jason Wilson writes in the Guardian, they're attacking the very idea that teenagers who survive a school shooting should be paid any attention. Because, you know, teenagers. Even Ben Shapiro, barely out of braces himself, is taking that approach.
The line between emotional and rational decision making is, as it happens, in the matter of gun control, one where the emotional does deserve extra weight. Because you can rationalise away legislative responses to almost any tragedy if you want to, and gun rights nutters are highly motivated to do so. The easiest way - routinely deployed - make the perfect the enemy of the good. It's a rational argument in its own way - you need emotional clout to say "stop deploying what you think is a 'rational' response to repeated death and mayhem, when there are sensible things that could be done."
Second point: Trump's response is only to call again for banning bumpstocks - not even implicated in the latest killing. At this rate, he'll contemplate increasing the age for buying AR-15s after another 6 mass shootings by teenagers.
Third point: a lot of discussion happening about how the attitudes of under 35's towards gun control is not as "liberal" as you would expect. Vox has a good article about it, but one thing I reckon would be important about this - the way polling is conducted on this issue is, I suspect, particularly open to uncertainty, given the speed with which recent shootings drop out of the public mind, and the very vagueness with some of the terminology such as "gun control". Hence it is an issue where politicians are entitled to take a lead and not just try to work out a response based on imprecise readings of what steps a majority would approve. But of course, politicians on the Right are the least likely to want to make any effort at all.
The latest: as Jason Wilson writes in the Guardian, they're attacking the very idea that teenagers who survive a school shooting should be paid any attention. Because, you know, teenagers. Even Ben Shapiro, barely out of braces himself, is taking that approach.
The line between emotional and rational decision making is, as it happens, in the matter of gun control, one where the emotional does deserve extra weight. Because you can rationalise away legislative responses to almost any tragedy if you want to, and gun rights nutters are highly motivated to do so. The easiest way - routinely deployed - make the perfect the enemy of the good. It's a rational argument in its own way - you need emotional clout to say "stop deploying what you think is a 'rational' response to repeated death and mayhem, when there are sensible things that could be done."
Second point: Trump's response is only to call again for banning bumpstocks - not even implicated in the latest killing. At this rate, he'll contemplate increasing the age for buying AR-15s after another 6 mass shootings by teenagers.
Third point: a lot of discussion happening about how the attitudes of under 35's towards gun control is not as "liberal" as you would expect. Vox has a good article about it, but one thing I reckon would be important about this - the way polling is conducted on this issue is, I suspect, particularly open to uncertainty, given the speed with which recent shootings drop out of the public mind, and the very vagueness with some of the terminology such as "gun control". Hence it is an issue where politicians are entitled to take a lead and not just try to work out a response based on imprecise readings of what steps a majority would approve. But of course, politicians on the Right are the least likely to want to make any effort at all.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
American gun paranoia at work
I had heard of this before - the guns rights organisations in the US are paranoid about the idea of the government having an easy to search, computer based system for tracing ownership of guns used in crimes. The result - a mountain of paper and microfiche records that are searched through (surprisingly, sometimes still successfully.)
This great national embarrassment - borne of simple paranoia that if the government knows who has a gun, they'll come and take it off you - is explained in detail, with photos, here at GQ (of all magazines.)
This great national embarrassment - borne of simple paranoia that if the government knows who has a gun, they'll come and take it off you - is explained in detail, with photos, here at GQ (of all magazines.)
Call for assistance
Can someone with time and better photo editing skills than me please convert this using Barnaby Joyce and Malcolm Turnbull's faces?:
I guess it has to be Barnaby on the left. Julie Bishop is in the background...
OK, well my pathetic, hurried abilities have to go on display again:
I guess it has to be Barnaby on the left. Julie Bishop is in the background...
OK, well my pathetic, hurried abilities have to go on display again:
King t'Urnbull confronts Killmarriager
Just not getting this...
I don't want to go on too much about the chronic over-rating of Black Panther, but I did forget to mention in my review that I didn't even find it visually very interesting. Hence comments like this one, to be found on Wired, leave me gobsmacked:
And as for the interior of the vibranium mine where the (underwhelming) climatic fight between the two main characters took place - it was one of those examples of complete CGI background gone too far, and looking unconvincing for it. A bit like the climatic setting of the last Guardians of the Galaxy movie, now that I think of it. Completely fake backgrounds have a way of making me too aware that the fighting is happening in front of green screen, and as such, there is no tension that they might fall off that (obviously unreal) high platform, for example.
Visually, no other Marvel movie has ever come close to Black Panther—the lush Wakandan landscapes, the vibrantly colored costumes, even the wearable tech was beautiful. And that moment where the Royal Talon Fighter dips below the veil and we get an aerial look over the Golden City? Jawdropping.Um, convincing looking fantasy cities, either functioning or dystopian, are a dime a dozen in movies these days, Marvel made or not. In fact, I was distinctly underwhelmed by the first appearance of the Wakanda city - it had African touches, but seriously, it was nothing groundbreakingly impressive, which the lead character had led us to expect.
And as for the interior of the vibranium mine where the (underwhelming) climatic fight between the two main characters took place - it was one of those examples of complete CGI background gone too far, and looking unconvincing for it. A bit like the climatic setting of the last Guardians of the Galaxy movie, now that I think of it. Completely fake backgrounds have a way of making me too aware that the fighting is happening in front of green screen, and as such, there is no tension that they might fall off that (obviously unreal) high platform, for example.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)