What with Trump voluntarily undoing the marginal benefit of the specific condemnation of neo Nazis and the KKK, I am curious as to who on the Right is supporting him re this disastrous presser. (After all, as I noted the other day, there was in fact very widespread criticism of him for the original "many sides" equivocation from some of the big culture warrior websites, such as PJ Media, National Review, Hot Air.)
So far, all I have spotted is John Hinderaker from Powerline (a high functioning moron from way back), who even goes so far as to suggest that the body language of Kelly at the press conference wasn't something we should read anything into. Yeah, sure, you fool.
But apart from him, well, that's all I've seen so far. I would assume Hannity will be on the "but he was only speaking the truth" line too, but he doesn't count as anything other than a ludicrous Fox programmed robot masquerading as a person with genuine and thoughtful opinions.
Oh, and let's not forget Fox wannabe Andrew Bolt, who hasn't commented on the latest Trump self inflicted wound, but he's completely on board with only talking about the "alt.left" when the whole weekend started off with a Nazi firelight procession.
I see that Krauthammer, who to his credit was never on board the Trump train, calls the press conference today a "moral disgrace." Good on him.
I don't know, but I get the feeling that this example of Trump's complete lack of political common sense and unwillingness to act on the advice of those who do have more moral and political nous may have reached a real turning point over these last few days. He is clearly someone impossible to work with, and his (so they say) usual chaotic method of business management (involving letting underlings fight it out for dominance) does not translate to politics. Rumours abound that either Bannon or McMaster or both displease him now and are about to go. If it's Bannon, I can't imagine he will go quietly.
We just need a some more abrupt resignations/sackings from the White House, and I think its his political end, one way or another.
Update: I suppose I should mention that Australian Trump Central - Catallaxy (thanks again, Sinclair Davidson for providing an outlet for your nutty mate Kates and Australian alt.right generally) see that there was nothing wrong with Trump's behaviour. Because Culture War - the Left are evil - people who don't agree with us are communist - why won't my friends talk to me anymore about politics?
Wednesday, August 16, 2017
Tuesday, August 15, 2017
This woeful President
If you, like me, thought that the Trump naming of the KKK, neo-Nazis and white supremacists sounded reluctant and still semi-equivocal (he couldn't resist still referring to "other hate groups" - which I took to be a dig at Lefty groups like Black Lives matter), then you'd be right. Slate (and AP) note that he had to be cajoled into making the further statement and was very unhappy about it, the fool man baby that he is:
Loath to appear to be admitting a mistake, Trump was reluctant to adjust his remarks. The president had indicated to advisers before his initial statement Saturday that he wanted to stress a need for law and order, which he did. He later expressed anger to those close to him about what he perceived as the media’s unfair assessment of his remarks, believing he had effectively denounced all forms of bigotry, according to outside advisers and White House officials.
Several of Trump’s senior advisers, including new chief of staff John Kelly, had urged him to make a more specific condemnation, warning that the negative story would not go away and that the rising tide of criticism from fellow Republicans on Capitol Hill could endanger his legislative agenda, according to two White House officials.And then he tweeted specifically:
Made additional remarks on Charlottesville and realize once again that the #Fake News Media will never be satisfied...truly bad people!It's a pity that simple but chronic immaturity isn't grounds for impeachment.
Some serious flooding happening
The Met Office notes:
Torrential monsoon rains over the last seven days have reached life-threatening levels for communities south of the Himalayas from Nepal to Bhutan and northern India to Bangladesh.As for whether the amount of rain is unusual - yes, it surely is, in some parts:
Severe floods and landslides have wrought havoc. Already across the affected region communities have faced tragedy, including: loss of life; thousands of homes submerged; extensive crop damage; as well as collapsed bridges and blocked roads.
Further heavy rain is forecast over the next few days and this will extend the zone of flooding downstream to communities lining those major rivers which flow from the Himalayas.
The monsoon is a natural part of south Asia’s weather, but this year rainfall in some areas has been over four times greater, when compared with the average between 1981–2010.
Worth noting
Slate explains the Wingnut conspiracy theories swirling around Charlottesville, including those by Trump endorsed lunatic actor Alex Jones.
Apart from him, these are the other 'Deep State' conspiracies floating around:
Apart from him, these are the other 'Deep State' conspiracies floating around:
Alt-right media personality Mike Cernovich, meanwhile, claimed that the violence was being initiated by left-wing groups in order to provoke a civil war. Another prominent alt-right social media voice, Jack Posobiec, said it was part of a “deep state [plot] to remove Trump allies in the WH and accelerate their coup.”
Julian Assange compared the torch-lit rally in Charlottesville to ones that took place in Ukraine in 2014, which he and alt-right voices also claim were Soros-funded affairs meant to foment the breakdown of civil society.
Finally, former Breitbart writer Patrick Howley wrote that by pressuring the president to denounce the racist attack, “Trump’s enemies are clearly hoping to separate Trump from any and all militia groups that could take part in potential acts of civil disobedience if Trump gets impeached and the nation heads into a Civil War-type scenario.”
His old boss, Steve Bannon, is now one of the most senior officials in Donald Trump's government.
Monday, August 14, 2017
Not entirely sure they've got their lines straight
I've been reading around the US right wing commentary about Charlottesville, and there's a bit of a struggle going on with getting their story straight.
First, I don't think I can really say that they aren't critical enough of Trump's lost opportunity of condemning white supremacists in clear terms. No, to find someone supportive of Trump on this, you have to come to Australian Fox News wannabe Andrew Bolt. Idiot.
Secondly, there are very few Right wing bloggers and culture warriors who aren't taking the opportunity to personally criticise the neo Nazi, white supremacists in strong terms. Take Roger Simon:
But, on the other hand, they can't help but try to find a way the Left, and the way to do is to blame identity politics for making sad nerdy white guys with trouble keeping a girlfriend fans of Hitler; who, let's face, really knew how to make white folk feel good about themselves.
So it is that Rod Dreher starts with the sort of criticism of Trump that Andrew Bolt can't bring himself to make:
He then goes on to note that God would not want people to become white supremacists either, and Churches shouldn't be shy about preaching that.
Good too.
And then, well, it goes off the rails:
Look, the fact is that major discrimination in American has only been dismantled during the lifetime of someone like me - less than 60 years ago. Of course issues of disadvantage and how to address it are still going to live issues at this time. And yes, there are important debates to be had as to the limits of the response, and that in some cases identity politics arguments are going to be worth criticising.
None of this should be sold as quasi justification for why White Supremacists should feeling more empowered these days. The blame for that falls squarely on the ignorant President and his enablers, who for political advantage have drummed up populist white grievance and encouraged their self pity and sense of entitlement in matters of race and sex.
Update: I was tempted last night to refer to blowhard Brendan O'Neill's similar line - he started a tweet with "The events in Charlottesville are the logical consequence of the politics of identity." Which is, of course, exactly the line to take if you are a white person who wants to be completely dismissive of all attention to reasons why there are obvious race based differences in equality and income in a nation with a history of serious racism only dismantled relatively recently.
He moved on to a second tweet arguing that Social Justice Warriors and White Supremacists are equivalent in both wanting to audition for social pity. Again, a completely ahistorical analysis of the matter, which will (of course) actually be taken by (lets be honest and use a SJW term when it is valid) privileged white males as supporting their view that they are being hard done by.
Evidence for that - look at the enthusiastic response it is receiving at Catallaxy - the last blog in the nation where you go to get serious and nuanced consideration of racism.
Hilariously, CL takes the line that it is wrong of O'Neill to draw an equivalency between SJW and "moronic" white supremacists - because SJWs are much much worse. They are communists who have killed massively more people. (A conclusion drawn by bringing in abortion to the discussion.) CL's answer to every allegation that the Right is wrong on something is to argue "but abortion!"
And let's end this with another
Shoutout to monty: Catallaxy is routinely at its worst when matters of race and racism come up, and for goodness sake, you even have JC crapping on about how white men are at some disadvantage.
Furthermore, he claims "The left has won every cultural and economic battle since WW2.", which, given the massive economic growth the world has seen since then, he doesn't seem to realise would actually be an endorsement of the left.
You're dealing with the stupid, and the "routinely offensive when it comes to race" stupid.
I still think you give them encouragement by your appearing there, and should stop.
First, I don't think I can really say that they aren't critical enough of Trump's lost opportunity of condemning white supremacists in clear terms. No, to find someone supportive of Trump on this, you have to come to Australian Fox News wannabe Andrew Bolt. Idiot.
Secondly, there are very few Right wing bloggers and culture warriors who aren't taking the opportunity to personally criticise the neo Nazi, white supremacists in strong terms. Take Roger Simon:
Nevertheless, the types who surfaced in Charlottesville on Saturday are certainly human beings of the most repellent and disgusting sort, murderous too -- pretty much violent, evil sociopaths. I wouldn't mind if they were all rounded up, put in a space ship, and sent on a one-way trip to Alpha Centauri.His article goes on to make a point I actually suggested in another post today: while terrible that they exist at all in this day and age, people probably shouldn't think that the white supremacist movement has all that large a following in the US based on one riot where the numbers weren't as high as originally feared. (And compared to the US last century.)
But, on the other hand, they can't help but try to find a way the Left, and the way to do is to blame identity politics for making sad nerdy white guys with trouble keeping a girlfriend fans of Hitler; who, let's face, really knew how to make white folk feel good about themselves.
So it is that Rod Dreher starts with the sort of criticism of Trump that Andrew Bolt can't bring himself to make:
On the Right, the story is fairly straightforward. Neo-Nazis, white nationalists, and their ilk have to be condemned in no uncertain terms, and marginalized. The president’s coy rhetoric, dancing around these people for fear of alienating them, has to end.Good.
He then goes on to note that God would not want people to become white supremacists either, and Churches shouldn't be shy about preaching that.
Good too.
And then, well, it goes off the rails:
But none of this will matter at all as long as the Left refuses to oppose identity politics in its own ranks. As I keep saying here, you cannot have an identity politics of the Left without calling up the same thing on the Right. Left-liberals who want conservatives to stigmatize and denounce white nationalism, but conservatives who do so will be sneered at by white nationalists as dupes and fools who advocate disarmament in the face of racist, sexist forces of the Left.Um, I 'm no fan of the extremities of identity politics/political correctness, but it's still kind of ludicrous to argue that it causes people to become neo-Nazis and white supremacists (who, incidentally, threw in homosexual taunting into the ring too at Charlottesville too - did you see the video of the mob shout-chanting "F... you faggots"? I did).
When the Left indulges in rhetoric that demonizes whites — especially white males — it summons the demons of white nationalism.
When the Left punishes white males who violate its own delicate speech taboos, while tolerating the same kind of rhetoric on its own side, it summons the demons of white nationalism.
When the Left obsesses over ethnic, sexual, and religious minorities, but ignores the plight of poor and working-class whites, it summons the demons of white nationalism.
When the Left institutionalizes demonization of white males in college classes, in political movements, in the media and elsewhere, it summons the demons of white nationalism.
Look, the fact is that major discrimination in American has only been dismantled during the lifetime of someone like me - less than 60 years ago. Of course issues of disadvantage and how to address it are still going to live issues at this time. And yes, there are important debates to be had as to the limits of the response, and that in some cases identity politics arguments are going to be worth criticising.
None of this should be sold as quasi justification for why White Supremacists should feeling more empowered these days. The blame for that falls squarely on the ignorant President and his enablers, who for political advantage have drummed up populist white grievance and encouraged their self pity and sense of entitlement in matters of race and sex.
Update: I was tempted last night to refer to blowhard Brendan O'Neill's similar line - he started a tweet with "The events in Charlottesville are the logical consequence of the politics of identity." Which is, of course, exactly the line to take if you are a white person who wants to be completely dismissive of all attention to reasons why there are obvious race based differences in equality and income in a nation with a history of serious racism only dismantled relatively recently.
He moved on to a second tweet arguing that Social Justice Warriors and White Supremacists are equivalent in both wanting to audition for social pity. Again, a completely ahistorical analysis of the matter, which will (of course) actually be taken by (lets be honest and use a SJW term when it is valid) privileged white males as supporting their view that they are being hard done by.
Evidence for that - look at the enthusiastic response it is receiving at Catallaxy - the last blog in the nation where you go to get serious and nuanced consideration of racism.
Hilariously, CL takes the line that it is wrong of O'Neill to draw an equivalency between SJW and "moronic" white supremacists - because SJWs are much much worse. They are communists who have killed massively more people. (A conclusion drawn by bringing in abortion to the discussion.) CL's answer to every allegation that the Right is wrong on something is to argue "but abortion!"
And let's end this with another
Shoutout to monty: Catallaxy is routinely at its worst when matters of race and racism come up, and for goodness sake, you even have JC crapping on about how white men are at some disadvantage.
Furthermore, he claims "The left has won every cultural and economic battle since WW2.", which, given the massive economic growth the world has seen since then, he doesn't seem to realise would actually be an endorsement of the left.
You're dealing with the stupid, and the "routinely offensive when it comes to race" stupid.
I still think you give them encouragement by your appearing there, and should stop.
Another reason the Charlottesville rally was a worry
The armed militia who turned up got some media attention, and probably deserved more. At Slate, Tom Perriello writes:
Still, with the evening theatrics of burning torch rallies, not to mention the daytime armed militia, they know how to look as intimidating as possible, and (of course) death and large scale injury was the actual result.
Saturday showed us a vision of a dystopian future that is the logical extension of our current gun laws. Not just gun ownership but AR-15s. Not just concealed carry but open carry. And not just the right to open carry even long guns but to dress in full military fatigues with accessories (earpieces, vests, insignias) to blur every line between legitimate law enforcement and a fully armed white nationalist militia. I have spent time in multiple conflict zones and still would not have known at a quick glance if bullets started flying which heavily armed men in camouflage and flak jackets represented law and order and which were armed terrorists. Donald Trump, who claims to be the hero of law enforcement, has issued no criticism of those who blur the line between public and private security forces, who blur the most sacred blue line between violence and force. Is there anything more vital of a commander in chief who claims to care about those who serve in uniform than to condemn those who fake the uniform?That said, I feel it probably also deserves to be noted by way of balance that the images from the rally may well give a false impression of the numbers of white supremacist support in the nation. I've noticed that estimates before the rally were that up to 6,000 may attend, but I think the final number ended up in the hundreds, rather than thousands.
Still, with the evening theatrics of burning torch rallies, not to mention the daytime armed militia, they know how to look as intimidating as possible, and (of course) death and large scale injury was the actual result.
Paging moral midgets, paging moral midgets...
When even the National Review runs an editorial headed "Condemn the White Supremacists, Mr. President", you really have to think about the increasing moral midget qualities of Andrew Bolt, who posts in support of what NR calls Trump's 'thus-far mealy-mouthed “both sides do it”'.
Meanwhile, I expect Tim Blair is busy looking up what Jonathan Green or some feminist had to say about it, so he can respond with a resounding "ha, but he kills foxes, and she's a frightbat" response.
Update: even someone writing at PJ Media, a right wing culture war site I hardly ever bother visiting any more, says this:
Meanwhile, I expect Tim Blair is busy looking up what Jonathan Green or some feminist had to say about it, so he can respond with a resounding "ha, but he kills foxes, and she's a frightbat" response.
Update: even someone writing at PJ Media, a right wing culture war site I hardly ever bother visiting any more, says this:
Evidently, Bolt can't see the problem with the omission that nearly everyone on the American Right can see.In fact, the sentiments expressed by the president were fine. But his failure to even mention the reason there was trouble in Charlottesville in the first place -- a demonstration by white supremacists -- raises questions about whether he has a real grasp of his job as president.Trump has disavowed the alt-right and said he doesn't want their support. But they continue to embrace him and brag about how they elected him. The president of the United States does not need the stink of these people's support and condemning them in the most powerful terms yesterday would have cleared the air.
The state of libertarianism
John Quiggin's post today about the current state of the US libertarian movement (he notes that one part of it has moved towards the Left - he's referring to the Niskanen Centre) is an interesting read. The question is, though, how many libertarians are ever going to be inclined to follow that path.
Sunday, August 13, 2017
As I (sort of) expected
What did I say after Trump more-or-less turned a Scout jamboree into a Trump Youth rally?:
OK, perhaps they weren't burning copies of the New York Times as I forecast, but there's no doubt they support Trump. (Look at how few women you can spot in all the photos and videos of this event, too. So far, I have spotted precisely one in that photo above.)
Trump is deservedly getting harsh attacks from all over the place for his woeful use of moral equivalence in response to the death of a counter protester at this white supremacist, neo Nazi rally (one at which, as many have noted, the participants nearly all feel confident enough of the political climate that they don't even worry about hiding their identity.) The headline at this Slate piece sums it up well:
In Appalling Speech on Charlottesville, Trump Condemns Bigotry and Violence “On Many Sides”
Out of many noteworthy tweets, I'll post this one:
Meanwhile at Sinclair Davidson's Alt Right Supporter's blog, there's a hell of a lot of shrugging of shoulder's going on, and in fact it is only being discussed at all because monty brought it up. Meanwhile Sinclair himself, showing his chronic moral immaturity (sorry, I can't read it any other way), shares a chuckle about nuclear threats to North Korea.
Monty - trying to engage with the foolish and offensive is a losing strategy, and participation unavoidably gives the blog a sense of endorsement. I, once again, think you are silly for appearing there at all.
Next up: night time, fire torch lit rallies on the streets of some city or other..
OK, perhaps they weren't burning copies of the New York Times as I forecast, but there's no doubt they support Trump. (Look at how few women you can spot in all the photos and videos of this event, too. So far, I have spotted precisely one in that photo above.)
Trump is deservedly getting harsh attacks from all over the place for his woeful use of moral equivalence in response to the death of a counter protester at this white supremacist, neo Nazi rally (one at which, as many have noted, the participants nearly all feel confident enough of the political climate that they don't even worry about hiding their identity.) The headline at this Slate piece sums it up well:
In Appalling Speech on Charlottesville, Trump Condemns Bigotry and Violence “On Many Sides”
Out of many noteworthy tweets, I'll post this one:
Monty - trying to engage with the foolish and offensive is a losing strategy, and participation unavoidably gives the blog a sense of endorsement. I, once again, think you are silly for appearing there at all.
Friday, August 11, 2017
I can feel my brain starting to hurt
A paper on arXiv:
The conception of reality in Quantum Mechanics
Disputes on the foundations of Quantum Mechanics often involve the conception of reality, without a clear definition on which aspect of this broad concept of reality one refers. We provide an overview of conceptions of reality in classical physics, in philosophy of science and in Quantum Mechanics and its interpretations and analyse their differences and subtleties. Structural realism as conception in philosophy of science will turn out to be a promising candidate to settle old problems regarding the conception of reality in Quantum Mechanics. We amend the analysis of three main interpretations and their relation to structural realism by three well-known informational approaches in the interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Last we propose an additional class of structural realism supported by QBism.
In other movie news...
In Toilet: Ek Prem Katha, Keshav (Akshay Kumar) isn’t expected to build a monument like the Taj Mahal that a Mughal emperor had built for his beloved wife, but a utility-friendly toilet for his bride (Bhumi Pednekar) who refuses to defecate in the open fields like the other women in his village.I hope it's on SBS in due course. The reviewer is having some fun further down:
The second half was decidedly a crash course on the existing government’s noble attempts at providing toilets across India and to highlight the narrow-mindedness among Indians who are shackled by cultural and religious beliefs.
But don’t give up on this film yet, because it has some golden moments scattered across it....
The first half is smooth, but it’s the second half that gets constipated. The premise which is intriguing and novel becomes repetitive and laboured. Some of the scenes in the second half seems contrived to make the current government shine and sparkle. Keshav and Jaya’s domestic problem snowballs into such a stinker of an issue that the entire state seems to be involved towards the end. There’s a good chance that you may have lost interest and your steam by all that drama surrounding a toilet-building battle.175 minute Bollywood extravaganza about defecating in India! Hollywood should pay attention, as it is scratching around for new ideas....
Toilet: Ek Prem Katha, which clocks 175 minutes ...
Sending him nuts
Tony Abbott is going a bit loopy, if you ask me:
And Malcolm should be shutting up on North Korea too, I reckon. Or at least, not giving them reason to try an experimental lob of a missile in our direction.
I also see (via Jason) that Tony's hyperbole about same sex marriage has been contradicted by Chris Kenny. I agree, Kenny's column is an unusually calm and measured one which I find hard to disagree with. I'm sure that Kenny will go back to being a bloviating political twit tomorrow.
My only puzzle is whether I take part in the silly postal opinion poll, or "vote" against it. I am half inclined to do something to amuse the counters, like vote "No" but ruin the ballot by writing on it something about how I don't want to see Tony Abbott hitching up with long time suitor David Marr. And I wonder how many papers will be not counted because of the addition of a male genitalia squiggle. Maybe men only do that if they are forced to vote.
Tony Abbott has called for Australia urgently to consider a missile defence shield to protect against attack by nuclear-armed North Korea.Kevin Rudd just blathers on, so it's silly to say Tony's not nuts because Kevin said the same.
And Malcolm should be shutting up on North Korea too, I reckon. Or at least, not giving them reason to try an experimental lob of a missile in our direction.
I also see (via Jason) that Tony's hyperbole about same sex marriage has been contradicted by Chris Kenny. I agree, Kenny's column is an unusually calm and measured one which I find hard to disagree with. I'm sure that Kenny will go back to being a bloviating political twit tomorrow.
My only puzzle is whether I take part in the silly postal opinion poll, or "vote" against it. I am half inclined to do something to amuse the counters, like vote "No" but ruin the ballot by writing on it something about how I don't want to see Tony Abbott hitching up with long time suitor David Marr. And I wonder how many papers will be not counted because of the addition of a male genitalia squiggle. Maybe men only do that if they are forced to vote.
A long, long way to go
Here's an article in Nature that suggests that those science fiction stories where the brain is scanned in 20 minutes and then the mind it hosts is uploaded into a computer, or another person, are just a tad unrealistic.
Even under the most humdrum conditions — “normal lighting; no sensory cues; they're not hungry”, says Zlatic — her fly larvae can be made to perform 30 different actions, including retracting or turning their heads, or rolling. The actions are generated by a brain comprising just 15,000 neurons. That is nothing compared with the 86 billion in a human brain, which is one of the reasons Zlatic and her teammates like the maggots so much.
“At the moment, really, the Drosophila larva is the sweet spot,” says Albert Cardona, Zlatic's collaborator and husband, who is also at Janelia. “If you can get the wiring diagram, you have an excellent starting point for seeing how the central nervous system works.”
Zlatic and Cardona lead two of the dozens of groups around the world that are generating detailed wiring diagrams for brains of model organisms. New tools and techniques for slicing up brains and tracing their connections have hastened progress over the past few years. And the resulting neural-network diagrams are yielding surprises — showing, for example, that a brain can use one network in multiple ways to create the same behaviours.
But understanding even the simplest of circuits — orders of magnitude smaller than those in Zlatic's maggots — presents a host of challenges. Circuits vary in layout and function from animal to animal. The systems have redundancy that makes it difficult to pin one function to one circuit. Plus, wiring alone doesn't fully explain how circuits generate behaviours; other factors, such as neurochemicals, have to be considered. “I try to avoid using the word 'understand',” says Florian Engert, who is putting together an atlas of the zebrafish brain at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “What do you even mean when you say you understand how something works? If you map it out, you haven't really understood anything.”
Against smartphone panic
After that article in The Atlantic about teenagers being ruined or destroyed or laid waste, or something like that, by obsessive use of smart phones, I've been a bit more interested in the counter articles than the original one.
Is that just because I think smartphones are awesome? I do dislike aspects of how they are used: everyone sitting at a table just using their phones is a bad thing. (And I find a lot of adults are as bad at that as their kids these days.) But then again, if you talk about what you're reading on it (and other people look up to listen), it's not as bad as it could be. And as for people not watching a performance directly, but viewing it on their phone screens while they record it (always with such crappy sound quality that you can't really enjoy playback at home anyway), that is a stupid habit.
Anyway, here are the articles against moral panic: one from Slate, and one from The Guardian. There are probably more out there, waiting to be found. On my phone...
Is that just because I think smartphones are awesome? I do dislike aspects of how they are used: everyone sitting at a table just using their phones is a bad thing. (And I find a lot of adults are as bad at that as their kids these days.) But then again, if you talk about what you're reading on it (and other people look up to listen), it's not as bad as it could be. And as for people not watching a performance directly, but viewing it on their phone screens while they record it (always with such crappy sound quality that you can't really enjoy playback at home anyway), that is a stupid habit.
Anyway, here are the articles against moral panic: one from Slate, and one from The Guardian. There are probably more out there, waiting to be found. On my phone...
The lesson: don't have Pepsi Max with your pizza
This article notes that it would seem that drinking a diet soda on a more or less empty stomach may not be so bad, but drinking one in combination with carbohydrates may be asking for trouble.
Complicated, our bodies...
Complicated, our bodies...
Thursday, August 10, 2017
Sounds rather "Rambo"
SHANGHAI
A Chinese action film that depicts the country's soldiers saving war-ravaged Africans from Western baddies soared to become China's all-time top box-office earner this week, headlining a summer of patriotic cinematic fare.
The wildly popular "Wolf Warriors 2" boasts the ominous tagline "whoever offends China will be hunted down no matter how far away they are", and millions of Chinese cinema-goers have lapped it up since the movie's release less than two weeks ago.
The blockbuster has raked in more than 3.4 billion yuan ($500 million) since debuting on July 27, according to unofficial China box-office trackers Maoyan, a leading ticket merchant, and other industry tallies.Update: Don't say that I don't put in effort for my reader[s] - here's the trailer from Youtube. And yes, it does involve Chinese Rambo rescuing poor Africans from bad guy Caucasians. Which, given China's recent inroads into African development, makes obvious propaganda sense. I look forward to future Chinese attempts to right the dysfunctional governments of that continent. They should have a crack at Afghanistan and the entire Middle East (save for Israel), too.
Update 2: I'm a bit annoyed that the Youtube is stuck on the flipping the finger scene. This blog usually has higher standards. On the other hand, it is of interest, I suppose, that it would seem that this is universally used insult across nearly all nations now.
About PSA
Simon Chapman writes pretty convincingly on the anti-prostate screening side in his article at The Conversation.
Red light discussed
This article in The Conversation notes that women avoid walking through red light streets - streets with a lot of strip clubs or other forms of "adult entertainment", such as King Street in Melbourne - for fear of sexual harassment by drunk men. That's pretty wise of them.
This may be unfair to women who have to divert from what might be the shortest route, but does this mean you shouldn't have red light streets at all?
One of the weirdest things in Brisbane, I have long thought, is that there is a strip club right in the Albert Street part of the main pedestrian mall. It's like 15 m from the dead centre of the mall. It doesn't have lurid pictures outside, which is something to be grateful for, but I have still always thought that this is a very strange place to put this type of venue. Yet it's been there for years and years.
Another oddity is the the old Grovenor Hotel on George Street. Decades ago, it used to be a normal sort of pub (not that I ever recall going there), but for a long time now it has been a topless venue. (including the ability to get a haircut from a topless woman.) This used to be just across the corner from the Supreme Court (since demolished and re-located), but it's still just across another corner from the high rise home of the Justice Department and the DPP. Again, this has always struck me as a bizarrely inappropriate place to running an adult entertainment venue.
Brisbane's actual red light district, such that it was, used to be in Fortitude Valley, but it was only ever a few venues, I think. I get the impression driving through it now that it barely has an "adult entertainment" venue now at all. It's more the scene for doof doof music clubs and party drugs. Unfortunately it has proved strongly resisted to commercial revival in many respects - Chinatown had a lot of money spent on it, and yet it still feels like it is going through a protracted commercial death. The McWhirter Centre, last time I visited it, felt like a complete failure as a retail centre. I think I did see someone from the tattoo shop engaged in a drug deal, though.
Anyway, my impression is still that strip clubs are best kept in one, small area, rather than having them in the middle of normal retail areas. I don't think that these dubious enterprises should be "normalised" by being in ordinary retail or commercial districts.
To be honest, in this day and day of internet pornography I don't know how or why strip clubs survive at all. Brothels I understand (so to speak), but strip clubs when there is so much more explicit things to be seen on the net? Very odd. But if they are going to exist at all, keep them out of the way, I say.
This may be unfair to women who have to divert from what might be the shortest route, but does this mean you shouldn't have red light streets at all?
One of the weirdest things in Brisbane, I have long thought, is that there is a strip club right in the Albert Street part of the main pedestrian mall. It's like 15 m from the dead centre of the mall. It doesn't have lurid pictures outside, which is something to be grateful for, but I have still always thought that this is a very strange place to put this type of venue. Yet it's been there for years and years.
Another oddity is the the old Grovenor Hotel on George Street. Decades ago, it used to be a normal sort of pub (not that I ever recall going there), but for a long time now it has been a topless venue. (including the ability to get a haircut from a topless woman.) This used to be just across the corner from the Supreme Court (since demolished and re-located), but it's still just across another corner from the high rise home of the Justice Department and the DPP. Again, this has always struck me as a bizarrely inappropriate place to running an adult entertainment venue.
Brisbane's actual red light district, such that it was, used to be in Fortitude Valley, but it was only ever a few venues, I think. I get the impression driving through it now that it barely has an "adult entertainment" venue now at all. It's more the scene for doof doof music clubs and party drugs. Unfortunately it has proved strongly resisted to commercial revival in many respects - Chinatown had a lot of money spent on it, and yet it still feels like it is going through a protracted commercial death. The McWhirter Centre, last time I visited it, felt like a complete failure as a retail centre. I think I did see someone from the tattoo shop engaged in a drug deal, though.
Anyway, my impression is still that strip clubs are best kept in one, small area, rather than having them in the middle of normal retail areas. I don't think that these dubious enterprises should be "normalised" by being in ordinary retail or commercial districts.
To be honest, in this day and day of internet pornography I don't know how or why strip clubs survive at all. Brothels I understand (so to speak), but strip clubs when there is so much more explicit things to be seen on the net? Very odd. But if they are going to exist at all, keep them out of the way, I say.
Brilliant
You know that West Virginian governor who just swapped from being a Democrat to a Republican? Well, sure seems that in doing so he boosted up the average Democrat politician IQ several points:
West Virginia Governor Jim Justice said Donald Trump is “really interested” in his plan to prop up Appalachian mining by giving federal money to power plants that burn the region’s coal.
Justice, a coal and real estate mogul elected governor last year as a Democrat, announced at a West Virginia rally alongside President Trump last week that he’s becoming a Republican. Justice has recently spent a “goodly amount of time" meeting one-on-one with Trump and has liked the feedback to his pro-coal proposal. The plan calls for the Department of Homeland Security to send $15 to eastern U.S. utilities for every ton of Appalachia coal they burn.
“He’s really interested. He likes the idea,” Justice said in a phone interview on Wednesday when asked about Trump’s reaction. “Naturally, he’s trying to vet the whole process. It’s a complicated idea.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)