Thursday, November 22, 2018
The return of the gnome
Sinclair Davidson seems to be posting more often at Catallaxy again, which gives a sad sort of fun, watching the hypocrisy and the nonsense coming from him directly rather than from the lazy, wilfully blind old blitherers and assorted guest posters who mainly post there now. "Quality control" is a concept foreign to libertarians, apparently.
Anyway, I was taken aback recently to note that he objected to Philip Adams tweeting about his hope that Alan Jones passes on from this mortal coil soon (while noting his ambition to die at the microphone too) with this comment:
Anyway, I was taken aback recently to note that he objected to Philip Adams tweeting about his hope that Alan Jones passes on from this mortal coil soon (while noting his ambition to die at the microphone too) with this comment:
...yet I was unaware that it is now entirely acceptable to publicly wish that your ideological enemies should die … and soon too.while remembering that only last year he was on the defensive for his Quadrant mate Roger Franklin going all death fantasy on Lawrence Krauss and the ABC after the Manchester bombing. Franklin's words (archived, as even Quadrant took it down after near universal condemnation):
What if that blast had detonated in an Ultimo TV studio? Unlike those young girls in Manchester, their lives snuffed out before they could begin, none of the panel’s likely casualties would have represented the slightest reduction in humanity’s intelligence, decency, empathy or honesty.
Mind you, as Krauss felt his body being penetrated by the Prophet’s shrapnel of nuts, bolts and nails, those goitered eyes might in their last glimmering have caught a glimpse of vindication.Nothing like a bit of tribalism to influence offence taking, hey?
A useful reminder
What's the bet that Trump will tweet about how the cold blast shows global warming is nothing to worry about?
And lots of dittoheads will agree.
By the way, I just checked the forecast for New York City - Thursday (which, at the time of this post, is still 5 hours away from starting) has a range of -7 to -2 degrees. Brisk!
Hindu nationalism a worry
According to Crux:
Anyway, Hindu nationalists are taking the defence of their religion way too seriously:
MUMBAI, India - A Catholic priest was attacked by a Hindu mob in northern India, and then arrested by police after Hindus accused him of causing the disturbance.Father Pereira has a very hippie Jesus look, by the way, and lives in a ashram. Seems Catholic clergy in India are always at risk of half going native, so to speak, if the example of Bede Griffiths was any example.
Father Vineet Vincent Pereira was conducting a prayer service in Ghohana town in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh when right-wing Hindus attacked him on Nov. 14.
Anyway, Hindu nationalists are taking the defence of their religion way too seriously:
Right-wing Hindu groups have accused the priest of trying to convert the local Hindu population.
The mob that attacked the priest were allegedly members of Hindu Yuva Vahini, a radical Hindu youth group that tries to “re-convert” Hindus that have switched religions.
After the attack, Pereira said police took him into custody - allegedly for his own safety - but then charged him the next day for rioting and unlawful assembly.
Wednesday, November 21, 2018
Krugman on why the Trump tax cuts have fizzled
I meant to link to this opinion piece by Krugman before, but it's interesting for his theory as to why the Trump tax cuts haven't achieved much. The key section, I think, is this:
Now, proponents of the tax cut, including Trump’s own economists, made a big deal about how we now have a global capital market, in which money flows to wherever it gets the highest after-tax return. And they pointed to countries with low corporate taxes, like Ireland, which appear to attract lots of foreign investment.
The key word here is, however, “appear.” Corporations do have a strong incentive to cook their books — I’m sorry, manage their internal pricing — in such a way that reported profits pop up in low-tax jurisdictions, and this in turn leads on paper to large overseas investments.
But there’s much less to these investments than meets the eye. For example, the vast sums corporations have supposedly invested in Ireland have yielded remarkably few jobs and remarkably little income for the Irish themselves — because most of that huge investment in Ireland is nothing more than an accounting fiction.
Now you know why the money U.S. companies reported moving home after taxes were cut hasn’t shown up in jobs, wages and investment: Nothing really moved. Overseas subsidiaries transferred some assets back to their parent companies, but this was just an accounting maneuver, with almost no impact on anything real.
So the basic result of lower taxes on corporations is that corporations pay less in taxes — full stop. Which brings me to the problem with conservative economic doctrine.
That doctrine is all about the supposed need to give the already privileged incentives to do nice things for the rest of us. We must, the right says, cut taxes on the wealthy to induce them to work hard, and cut taxes on corporations to induce them to invest in America.
But this doctrine keeps failing in practice. President George W. Bush’s tax cuts didn’t produce a boom; President Barack Obama’s tax hike didn’t cause a depression. Tax cuts in Kansas didn’t jump-start the state’s economy; tax hikes in California didn’t slow growth.
And with the Trump tax cut, the doctrine has failed again. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to get politicians to understand something when their campaign contributions depend on their not understanding it.I wonder if this is being challenged by anyone credible (ie, not a Laffer zombie).
We seem to do lettuce better than the US...
I know we have an occasional fresh vegetable/fruit contamination issue, but the US seems to have an awful lot of incidents like this:
Federal health officials are urging consumers to stop eating romaine lettuce and asking industry to halt all sales amid an extensive E. coli outbreak unfolding across the U.S. and Canada.Even the Americans seem to acknowledge this happens way too often:
“CDC and FDA did the right thing and gave a very broad warning to consumers. Hopefully they will find the source of the contamination and the cause quickly,” said Sandra Eskin, director of food safety at the Pew Charitable Trusts.
“We have seen so many leafy green outbreaks over the last year — it is really undermining consumer confidence in the safety of these otherwise healthy products,” Eskin added.
Comparing disasters
The photos of destruction coming out after the terrible Californian fires are quite something.
I was curious as to how it compared to the harm caused by the Victorian Black Saturday fires, which sort of set the modern Australian image of how bad our bushfires can be.
A quick Google would indicate that 2,029 homes were destroyed in our home-grown disaster (but apparently another 1,000 or so buildings too.) Number of people killed: 173.
The Californian fire is being reported as having destroyed about 12,000 homes, and while the death toll is still currently below 100, there's another 700 missing. (Which really seems an extraordinary number after this time.)
So yeah, at least in property destruction, the Californian fires are already on a much larger scale, and may well end up having killed many more people too.
I was curious as to how it compared to the harm caused by the Victorian Black Saturday fires, which sort of set the modern Australian image of how bad our bushfires can be.
A quick Google would indicate that 2,029 homes were destroyed in our home-grown disaster (but apparently another 1,000 or so buildings too.) Number of people killed: 173.
The Californian fire is being reported as having destroyed about 12,000 homes, and while the death toll is still currently below 100, there's another 700 missing. (Which really seems an extraordinary number after this time.)
So yeah, at least in property destruction, the Californian fires are already on a much larger scale, and may well end up having killed many more people too.
Elver abuse
You can congratulate me later for the title to the post, after you've read all about what's possibly the oddest criminal activity in the world:
Billions of euros worth of critically endangered eels are being trafficked each year from Europe, ending up on tables in China and Japan in what campaigners say is "the largest wildlife crime on Earth."
Stocks of European eel (anguilla anguilla) have plummeted 90 percent in three decades as mankind has developed the wetlands and dammed the rivers it needs to grow and feed in, and experts fear criminal gangs smuggling the lucrative fish are pushing it towards oblivion.PS: if I have to explain - an elver is a young eel.
The problem, according to Michel Vignaud, head of fishing regulation at France's National Biodiversity Agency, is exploding Asian demand for a product viewed as both a delicacy and an aphrodisiac.
"We cannot legally export eels outside the EU, but the prices are different in Asia. There is a real Asian demand for eel," he told AFP.
The UN's Food and Agriculture Organization said that in 2016 China produced close to a quarter of a million tonnes of eel for consumption, far ahead of Japan—where eating eel is seen as bringing good luck and fertility—and the EU.
The bloc's law enforcement agency EUROPOL estimates as many as 100 tonnes of baby eels—known as glass eels for their translucent skin—are trafficked abroad each year: equivalent to around 350 million fish.
Tuesday, November 20, 2018
Nudism not gone quite as planned
The Sydney Morning Herald has a story about how residents at Byron Bay, which has a (not very easy to get to, by the sounds) official nudist beach, are pretty sick of the creepy men engaging in offensive and harassing behaviour of a sexual nature.
Update: Here's a theory: while the internet means a lot more people see a lot more nude bodies than ever before, there is pretty good evidence from the rise in plastic surgery for breasts and labia that it has made (at least some) women more anxious and self conscious about perceived imperfections in their normally unexposed areas. That, of course, is not the sort of attitude which makes public beach nudity appealing. (And the rise of pubic hair removal has exacerbated this concern for women too.)
I had also noticed, perhaps a year ago?, that an unofficial nudist beach at Noosa had attracted police attention and resulted in arrests and convictions.
I find it interesting that public attitudes to the practice of nudism, in at least the English speaking West, have not really gone as someone in the 1960's might have expected. Robert Heinlein, who I think was himself a nudist (and apparently sexually adventurous before it was quite the thing), used to write books in which appearing nude in public was not such a big deal in the future; and given the hippy free love movement and nude mud baths happening at festivals in the 60's, it would have seemed a fair prediction at the time.
As society morphed on from there, you would get claims from time to time about how nudist tourism was booming, which seems a journalist trope that just never goes away. Yet, it seems clear that, by and large, the nudist movement in America, England and Australia has gone backwards, both in terms of clubs and even use of nudist beaches.
Why is it that, at a time of (relative) sexual liberation and less panic about nudity on television and media, actual nudity in public in the West has declined? And why do nude beaches attract an increasing number of creepy men? One would have thought the internet and porn would give them more reason to stay indoors. Is there a line being crossed between internet porn being a diversion from acting out in public, and it working as encouragement to get out to commit offensive and worrying behaviour?
I mean, I guess nudism's connection with sexuality was never going to go away (despite high minded insistence by naturists that there is no essential connection), but I still didn't really expect its public practice to go backwards.
I mean, I guess nudism's connection with sexuality was never going to go away (despite high minded insistence by naturists that there is no essential connection), but I still didn't really expect its public practice to go backwards.
Update: Here's a theory: while the internet means a lot more people see a lot more nude bodies than ever before, there is pretty good evidence from the rise in plastic surgery for breasts and labia that it has made (at least some) women more anxious and self conscious about perceived imperfections in their normally unexposed areas. That, of course, is not the sort of attitude which makes public beach nudity appealing. (And the rise of pubic hair removal has exacerbated this concern for women too.)
Roubini on digital currency
Nouriel Roubini - probably cryptocurrency's and blockchain's biggest critic - discusses what the future of digital currency might be.
Interesting.
I haven't noticed Chris Berg or Sinclair Davidson giving one of their vapourware quality chats on the potential of blockchain for a while. I suspect that the topic has been mined for all its worth (ha, a bit of a crypto pun there) and it's time for them to move on.
Monday, November 19, 2018
A not-as-late-as-usual movie review
A Quiet Place: In summary: nasty (and kinda generic looking in a modern-movie, big-toothed, weird-headed, way) aliens spend all their time running around the countryside slashing humans (or racoons) who are too loud. A family holes up in their farm trying to get by, very quietly, in such a world.
On the upside: there are quite a few scares, but to be honest, they are mostly the relatively cheap jump-scare variety. Acting is pretty good.
On the downside: [lots of spoilers ahead] a lot does not bear too much thinking about. For one thing: I was puzzled as to how the corn fields got planted, since the time line indicated that they must have been planted well after the aliens arrived. [OK, I'll be generous here, and allow that maybe the aliens were busy devastating the towns and cities before they headed into the countryside. But even then, would seem a tad odd that the farmers just got on with planting as if there were no alien invasion going on.]
For a second thing: these aliens don't look too smart, and don't seem to eat their human and animal victims: just slash them open and run. That's sort of odd behaviour, even for an alien, isn't it? What is the motivation for killing all noisy humans?*
A third thing: corn in silos is like quicksand? I suspected not, and the comments by several (apparent) farmers on this Reddit thread indicate that my scepticism was justified.
There are many other points I found myself doubting: sure, being a new mother can be tiring, but sleeping through a basement flood that big? Especially as she would presumably have become used to sleeping in total silence for a year or more.
The film overall reminded me too much of the woeful (and even sillier) Signs with Mel Gibson: it also had a lot of corn and aliens, a Christian family, and aliens weirdly unprepared for human resistance by use of something pretty foreseeable. (Actually, blindingly obvious, in the case of Signs.) OK, again, being generous, maybe these latest aliens are just like the equivalent of hungry pet wolves let loose on the planet by their smart owners we never see. (Again, why is the obvious question.)
I don't regret watching it, and I can see how it was pitched successfully as a high concept alien invasion story: but it didn't deserve the very strong critical reception. It pushed the plausibility boundaries way too often for that.
* I have just now read an article that says it's clear by the end that the aliens are killing because they just need a silent planet on which to live. If they are that sensitive to any and all sound - how do they put up with rain? Did they cross light years to get here without inventing earplugs or noise reducing headphones? I mean, they have huge ear holes, to be sure, but this still seems a bit silly.
On the upside: there are quite a few scares, but to be honest, they are mostly the relatively cheap jump-scare variety. Acting is pretty good.
On the downside: [lots of spoilers ahead] a lot does not bear too much thinking about. For one thing: I was puzzled as to how the corn fields got planted, since the time line indicated that they must have been planted well after the aliens arrived. [OK, I'll be generous here, and allow that maybe the aliens were busy devastating the towns and cities before they headed into the countryside. But even then, would seem a tad odd that the farmers just got on with planting as if there were no alien invasion going on.]
For a second thing: these aliens don't look too smart, and don't seem to eat their human and animal victims: just slash them open and run. That's sort of odd behaviour, even for an alien, isn't it? What is the motivation for killing all noisy humans?*
A third thing: corn in silos is like quicksand? I suspected not, and the comments by several (apparent) farmers on this Reddit thread indicate that my scepticism was justified.
There are many other points I found myself doubting: sure, being a new mother can be tiring, but sleeping through a basement flood that big? Especially as she would presumably have become used to sleeping in total silence for a year or more.
The film overall reminded me too much of the woeful (and even sillier) Signs with Mel Gibson: it also had a lot of corn and aliens, a Christian family, and aliens weirdly unprepared for human resistance by use of something pretty foreseeable. (Actually, blindingly obvious, in the case of Signs.) OK, again, being generous, maybe these latest aliens are just like the equivalent of hungry pet wolves let loose on the planet by their smart owners we never see. (Again, why is the obvious question.)
I don't regret watching it, and I can see how it was pitched successfully as a high concept alien invasion story: but it didn't deserve the very strong critical reception. It pushed the plausibility boundaries way too often for that.
* I have just now read an article that says it's clear by the end that the aliens are killing because they just need a silent planet on which to live. If they are that sensitive to any and all sound - how do they put up with rain? Did they cross light years to get here without inventing earplugs or noise reducing headphones? I mean, they have huge ear holes, to be sure, but this still seems a bit silly.
Learning languages
Quite a helpful article here discussing the pros and cons (mainly the cons) of using the popular "learn a foreign language" app Duolingo.
I've been tempted to try it, but never have.
I've been tempted to try it, but never have.
In praise of spaghetti carbonara
I hadn't made my own spaghetti carbonara for a long time 'til last Saturday, but I thought this recipe worked pretty well and was similar to the last I had used from an old cookbook. (Cookbook publishers must be hating the internet and its effect on sourcing recipes.)
I tend to like to a drier carbonara - some people prefer a wetter version. It does seem to me that people can get very snooty about the right way to do this dish, a bit like those people who insist that country X's food here is nothing like the real thing when you actually go there. (I usually find this is a greatly exaggerated claim.)
In any event, isn't it the case that Italians don't eat pasta as a main meal in quite the way we do? I wouldn't mind betting that this may have changed in recent years too.
I like the way you can be non-trad with the recipe - adding some fresh asparagus and small sized bits of broccoli worked well on Saturday, and using just bacon was fine. Many people like to add mushrooms too, it seems, and I would have if there were any in the refrigerator.
Left over reheats surprisingly well in the microwave too.
So yeah, I should make it more often.
I tend to like to a drier carbonara - some people prefer a wetter version. It does seem to me that people can get very snooty about the right way to do this dish, a bit like those people who insist that country X's food here is nothing like the real thing when you actually go there. (I usually find this is a greatly exaggerated claim.)
In any event, isn't it the case that Italians don't eat pasta as a main meal in quite the way we do? I wouldn't mind betting that this may have changed in recent years too.
I like the way you can be non-trad with the recipe - adding some fresh asparagus and small sized bits of broccoli worked well on Saturday, and using just bacon was fine. Many people like to add mushrooms too, it seems, and I would have if there were any in the refrigerator.
Left over reheats surprisingly well in the microwave too.
So yeah, I should make it more often.
Saturday, November 17, 2018
William Goldman
Famous screenwriter/novelist William Goldman has died. You know, I don't recall knowing what he looked like until now, despite having read a few of his books.
I had forgotten that he wrote Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid - a film which, incidently, I felt was vastly over-rated when I saw it as a child. (My mother was a big Robert Redford fan - I think I was tagging along with her when I saw it. Not sure if my father was there too.) I wonder if I would feel differently about it as an adult? I still have this gut feeling that it was very lightweight and trivial.
Anyway, Goldman interested me more for his books about the industry, and I suspect that he might have become slightly dismayed that, despite "nobody knowing anything" in Hollywood, studios have become pretty good at knowing what franchise material will make a killing in the first week or two, regardless of critical reception. (Although, I guess, that Solo movie's failure almost certainly came as a surprise.)
I had forgotten that he wrote Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid - a film which, incidently, I felt was vastly over-rated when I saw it as a child. (My mother was a big Robert Redford fan - I think I was tagging along with her when I saw it. Not sure if my father was there too.) I wonder if I would feel differently about it as an adult? I still have this gut feeling that it was very lightweight and trivial.
Anyway, Goldman interested me more for his books about the industry, and I suspect that he might have become slightly dismayed that, despite "nobody knowing anything" in Hollywood, studios have become pretty good at knowing what franchise material will make a killing in the first week or two, regardless of critical reception. (Although, I guess, that Solo movie's failure almost certainly came as a surprise.)
Thursday, November 15, 2018
Death by social media
The BBC has been trying to tally up how many people in India have died as a result of social media spreading false rumours. And one appalling story is told in detail:
Across India mob attacks are on the rise, fuelled by false rumours on WhatsApp and social media. According to the BBC's analysis of incidents between February 2014 and July 2018, at least 31 people have been killed and dozens more injured. These are the incidents the BBC was able to verify, many more have been reported.
Many of the false rumours warn people that there are child abductors in their towns, driving locals to target innocent men who are not known to the community. A total of 25 men, 4 women, and two people of unknown gender have died. Here is a timeline of those incidents the BBC has verified.
In one striking example, a video clip shared on WhatsApp went viral in India in June 2018, with tragic consequences. In the clip, a man on a motorbike appears to be kidnapping a child from the street. The messages that accompanied the video as it was shared from phone to phone alleged that the incident had occurred in Bangalore and warned the community to be on the lookout for “potential child-lifters”. Vigilante mobs formed and killed an estimated 10 people.
But the outrage overshadowed the true story.
The clip was in fact part of a safety video produced by a child welfare group in Pakistan. At the end of the original video, the supposed “kidnapper” returns the child to his friends and holds up a sign that reads “It takes only a moment to kidnap a child from the streets of Karachi.” This was edited out in the viral version.
Another bad, high profile, Netflix movie?
The Guardian reviewer really dislikes a new Netflix movie with some big star power in it. [Sandra Bullock, John Malkovich, Jacki Weaver (!)]
Seems to me that, for a company that plans on being such a major player in movie content, they have to do something about quality control, fast.
Seems to me that, for a company that plans on being such a major player in movie content, they have to do something about quality control, fast.
Dutch tradition considered
I didn't know about the Dutch "Black Pete" controversy. An interesting article at The Guardian.
Freud, Jung, sex
Quite a nice summary in this Aeon essay about how Jung and Freud's professional and personal relationship started and broke up.
Jung is deservedly the more interesting character and theorist. And yeah, it's true: Freud went off the rails over sex.
Jung is deservedly the more interesting character and theorist. And yeah, it's true: Freud went off the rails over sex.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)