Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Good


10 comments:

not trampis said...

Why is that.

It is good for nine. Uhlmann is high quality

Steve said...

Well, it's not that I think he shouldn't have a job as a journo. It's just that he was sullying the Left-ish purity of the ABC. :)

I have explained many times: he was always a soft interview for Abbott, but in any event I think he is pretty dull as an interviewer or commentator. And, I do not trust him on climate change. I think he still carries a smug attitude of false balance on the topic.

not trampis said...

so he isn't perfect. so what Overall he iso ne of the best. It is a great coup for Nine

Steve said...

I rarely watch Nine. Look, he continues to make a quid, keep his Canberra connections and is seen less by me and lots of other sensible people who get most of their news from the ABC or SBS. It is a good outcome.

Anonymous said...

Paxton,

How the hell would you know what quality is after the Skanke Ho embarrassment.

not trampis said...

The embarrassment was on your part in not knowing how the Urban dictionary works.
obviously people were wondering how you could even spell the words!

Jason Soon said...

still blaming it on urban dictionary Homer?

Anonymous said...

LOl.. The urban dictionary made him do it. His dimness isn't responsible, it was the Urban Dictionary.

Stepford, if you're complaining about Catallaxy commenters, it's more than hypocritical of you to be keeping Paxton here. Ban him before it's too late.

Steve said...

Why would I ban him?

anon said...

Because he's a total idiot.