If I ruled the world, there are certain things about the design of business trousers I would legislate for:
a. having decided on a certain cut, the manufacturer must maintain it for a minimum of 3 years. If I decide a pair of trousers are nice and comfortable, and they seem long wearing, I don't want to go back and try buying the same trousers in the same size 6 months later and find they do not fit so well. Especially if I have actually lost a bit of weight since I bought the first pair. :(
b. no matter the width of the leg below the knee, the cut above the knee must allow for the insertion of a wallet in one pocket, and keys in the other, without causing undue tightness in the leg and an obvious outline of said wallet and keys to appear and disrupt the look;
c. pocket material must be particularly strong to resist the wear of keys within them. There is nothing worse than having a perfectly fine pair of trousers develop a hole in a pocket that makes you have to reverse the customary sides you keep your wallet and keys in;
d. must be machine washable. None of this "dry clean only" malarkey;
e. some natural fibres must be incorporated. No one should wear purely synthetic fibres - I'm pretty sure God was trying to pass that message on in Old Testament but it got a bit muddled up when the audience didn't follow what "synthetic" meant;
f. coin pockets on the right hand side are still required, for now. They can be abandoned in another 5 years;
Authoritarians used to fuss about clothes (Hitler, Mao - I think); what's the use of modern day ones like Trump if he can't deal with these fashion problems?
No comments:
Post a Comment