Anyway, I was taken aback recently to note that he objected to Philip Adams tweeting about his hope that Alan Jones passes on from this mortal coil soon (while noting his ambition to die at the microphone too) with this comment:
...yet I was unaware that it is now entirely acceptable to publicly wish that your ideological enemies should die … and soon too.while remembering that only last year he was on the defensive for his Quadrant mate Roger Franklin going all death fantasy on Lawrence Krauss and the ABC after the Manchester bombing. Franklin's words (archived, as even Quadrant took it down after near universal condemnation):
What if that blast had detonated in an Ultimo TV studio? Unlike those young girls in Manchester, their lives snuffed out before they could begin, none of the panel’s likely casualties would have represented the slightest reduction in humanity’s intelligence, decency, empathy or honesty.
Mind you, as Krauss felt his body being penetrated by the Prophet’s shrapnel of nuts, bolts and nails, those goitered eyes might in their last glimmering have caught a glimpse of vindication.Nothing like a bit of tribalism to influence offence taking, hey?
3 comments:
great minds.
I got Davidson pn telling porkies and basically knowing nothing about subjects he is writing about.
Defending a sexual predator?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/22/science/lawrence-krauss-retires-sexual-harassment.html
Ha. I'd hardly be making that point (one unknown to Franklin at the time of his death fantasy anyway) when the other character in the comparison was one who many regard as having been lucky to avoid an investigation into student grooming behaviour when he was a teacher:
https://www.smh.com.au/national/the-demons-that-drive-alan-jones-20061021-gdone7.html
Post a Comment