I see that when not suing Hilary Clinton as a way of pandering to the Tucker Carlson, Trump loving, Hilary hating audience, Tulsi is advertising this:
Now, this may be an admirable policy in a Democrat candidate, but I don't see it sitting all that well with the Tucker Trump voters who love their gormless President going on a massive ramp up of military spending, including on new nuclear weapons.
She is, in other words, just a chronic attention seeker who Republicans will love because of their shared hatred of Hilary Clinton, but for whom they will never vote. And, of course, because she is pandering to Republicans in this way, next to no self respecting Democrat is going to vote for her either.
Just a useless spoiler for the side she claims to belong to.
Update: I was trying to think what Australian politician she reminds me of, but the best I could up with is that she's like a noxious amalgam of Tim Wilson, Mark Latham and Kevin Rudd.
21 comments:
Is this the candidate soony is swooning about?
Yes [rolls eyes].
Haha,
He just likes because of her looks
I think he likes her because they both think that the most important thing about the next election is owning Hilary Clinton.
Shoo, Graeme. Shoo.
Shoo.
Is John Fugelsang trying to be ironic here? He's a fucking idiot. Yes she's addressing Democratic primary voters on Tucker and everyone else. If thats an attempt at irony clearly this fellow is a moron.
You DUMB-leftists, you morons, don't listen to a wide range of views. You bubble-heads don't want to be pointing the bone at every registered Democrat.
"Now, this may be an admirable policy in a Democrat candidate....."
Yes so what's your point you moron? You didn't have one? So you managed to turn around something that was good, by your own admission, and because you are a moron AND VIRTUALLY ALWAYS WRONG .... without any argument at all, the good becomes the bad.
So we are just back to this yokel KKK type bigotry. The crudest type of mindlessness that cannot be reasoned with.
This may be your most stupid post out of all of them. You almost cannot help but argue in favour of Tulsi, yet your tone-of-voice argument is against her, on the grounds that everyone ought to be precisely as moronic and one-eyed as you are.
Post a Comment