To be fair, both sides of the culture wars do it: try to work out whether the latest mass shooter in the US can be fitted into the other side's politics.
A reason the Left shouldn't do it - or be very, very cautious about it - is that the suspicion doesn't always follow through. It seems clear now, for example, that the big gun massacre of a gay nightclub in Orlando a few years ago was not a case of gays being targetted. According to Vox, even the Right assumed it was, but it turns out to have been a Muslim "revenge" attack based on a mere Google search for any nightclub..
The Right now think they are a similar "win", with the defence saying that the Colorado gay nightclub shooter of a couple of days ago is "non binary". So they are rubbing their hands with glee that his or her (OK, "their") politics are probably not Right wing at all. Although, who knows, they might be. Most likely, though, given previous threats of violence to their mother, the shooter is just another mentally disturbed American with access to guns that they wouldn't have access to in any sane, well run, country. Their politics is not going to change that one way or another.
Today, there is news of a pretty different style of mass shooting in America (subject to confirmation) - a manager shooting up other staff, rather than the more typical case of the underling going after management. What is it going to matter what this guy's politics were?
I understand the Left side's temptation to assume that, say, attacks on gay venues are by Right wing sympathisers; I mean when you get the God-awful Tucker Carlson running with something like this line...
...well, the Right itself is suggesting that shootings are a result of the culture war they are stoking. And sometimes, the offender has indeed been completely sucked in by Right wing conspiracy theories, like the Pizzagate shooter, making the culture war aspect directly relevant.
But, the main reason I find it a game the Left should not rush into is because (and this is what drives me nuts about watching it), it's so clear that the Right uses it as a convenient distraction to avoid taking further gun control seriously.
"Oh, so you thought it was a MAGA sympathiser who shot up that nightclub? Turns out he voted for Obama! Ha! We win (and we don't have to talk about AR 15s. We Won!)"
It's as pathetic as the line that the answer to mass shootings is keeping guns out the hands of the mentally ill - as if the mentally ill are easily identified, easily disarmed, and easily treated if they don't want to be treated. Again, it's just a stupid way of pretending that it's not really the access to guns that's the issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment