History corner

 It seems he was a very healthy guy for his age too, since he is said to have been giving cogent interviews last year:

He explained last year in an interview with Jason Morgan, an associate professor at Reitaku University in Kashiwa, for the English-language website Japan Forward, “I’m ashamed that I’m the only one who survived and lived such a long life.”

Asked in that interview if ever thought of visiting Pearl Harbor, he at first replied, “I wouldn’t know what to say.” He then added: “If I could go, I would like to, I would like to visit the graves of the men who died. I would like to pay them my deepest respect.”

 And here he is, from 2023:

 

Put me in the skeptic column

So, some guy has put up a video about his a-mazing discovery that looking at a laser the right way while high on DMT (the hallucinogen with a reputation for causing "machine elves" or other alien-ish entities to turn up as part of the trip) causes people to be able to see the code behind our reality.  Yes, like the Matrix movie:

  

 

I would be a bit less skeptical if he wasn't running a GoFundMe page to finish the documentary he says he's making about it.

I also don't know if there is any particular reason why a drug that is known for producing one particular trip fairly often (the visiting machine elves ones) should not also have a quirk of making people see numbers when the illumination is right.   I mean, that it should produce a numbers illusion is perhaps less odd than it making it feel like intelligent beings are coming to commune with you.  I think.

Anyway, let's see where this goes.  Hopefully, not just a case of money into this guy's pocket with nothing further.

Depravity corner

It's a topic I don't even like to think about, but it's so astounding to me that people can develop get some sort of seriously perverse pleasure out of this, it seems worth noting.   On the BBC website, this:

One of the ringleaders of a global monkey torture network exposed by the BBC has been sentenced to three years and four months in prison.

Mike Macartney, 50, who used the alias ‘The Torture King’, pleaded guilty in the US state of Virginia to conspiracy to create and distribute animal crushing videos.

Macartney was one of three key distributors identified by the BBC Eye team in a year-long investigation into sadistic monkey torture groups.

The BBC’s reporting led to a nationwide criminal investigation in the US by the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

A former motorcycle gang member who previously spent time in prison, Macartney ran several of the most high-profile torture groups, based on the encrypted message app Telegram.

Sadists around the world used Telegram groups to share ideas for specific methods of torture. Those requests were then sent, along with payments, to video makers in Indonesia, who carried them out on baby long-tailed macaques.

Though Macartney collected funds and distributed videos, he was able to show that he had never sent money directly to an Indonesian video maker.

This comes not long after the equally bizarre story of the zoologist guy in the Northern Territory who had a side line in sexually defiling dogs and then torturing them to death for a video fan club.  At least he got 10 years in jail (and, hopefully, the loss of all family contact, forever.)  

I really have no understanding of how men can respond to such material - or not recognize that it is indeed a serious problem to get pleasure that way, and not seek counselling or treatment to stop getting off on it.

 

 

The only Frank Lloyd Wright skyscraper

Well, it's pretty short as far as skyscrapers go, but I didn't know it existed at all.   It has seen better days, though, as this well illustrated NYT article explains.

Bad trips, and Buddhism re-visited

So, last weekend this video, called We Finally Know Why Causes Bad Trips, was recommended to me by the All Knowing Google (YouTube arm):  

 

I have thoughts: 

a.   Even allowing for the algorithmic need for an eye-catching thumbnail, I really don't like this one, as (despite the content in the video itself), it really seems to encouraging people to not take "bad trips" very seriously.   

b.   It does mention ecstasy amongst the list of hallucinogens, which was news to me.   

c.   The video talks about how one of the features of a bad trip can be ego dissolution (or ego death), and that this sensation alone can have lasting negative effects after the drug has worn off.

d.   As usual with any internet content in which someone presents a cautionary note on the use of any recreational drug, it immediately attracts defenders of their habit in comments.   But the range of views in this thread are pretty interesting, mainly because of the two camps - those who say they went through the ego dissolution but found it peaceful or calming (or insightful), and those who said it was a very negative sensation for them which, for some, took months or years to get over.   (You also get the odd person who says they know someone who never was the same again from use of LSD or whatever, and not in a good way.)

Lots of people in comments go on about the basic idea that you should never use a hallucinogen if not in the "right" mood for it, and without being in a safe place with supportive people, etc.   But I still get the feeling that this is no guarantee of a positive trip.

The video explains that some MRI scanning indicates that people undergoing a bad trip (well, it actually mentions ego dissolution) were more likely to have glutamate active in the medial prefrontal cortex.   How useful this knowledge is seemingly anyone's guess - it certainly doesn't indicate any possibility of prediction of a bad trip 

e.   Anyway, the general discussion of ego dissolution got me thinking about Buddhism and its core idea of Anatta, or no self.   It's difficult not to draw a connection there, and while I have mentioned before the possible inspirational role of hallucinogens to Buddhist and Hindu imagery, I'm not sure that it had occurred to me before as inspiring Anatta.   

Anyway, in a broader sense, it is a little hard to understand why the sensation of experiencing loss of self or ego under drugs (or intense meditation, I suppose) should be unpleasant for some, but give a sense of peace to others.

Mind you, as I noted before, Mahayana Buddhism pushes back on the idea of extinction of self in favour of the core of a person being a process that, once enlightened enough, can decide how to manifest in various forms - which I suppose is consistent with reincarnation, it just disagrees about nirvana being an form of extinction.  This was all explained better in this post.   

Once again, though, it brings me back to my old dissatisfaction with the apparent contradiction in Buddhism as a philosophy - how compassion is meant to work in any motivational sense if you're walking around firmly of the view that not only your own life is a barely held together group of sensations, but that's all that is at the core of every one around you as well.  

Google can point me to the response:

By exposing the transparency of self, one opens up to the relational nature of identity, and thereby creates the ground for empathy and engagement.

From the same link (by Stephen Batchelor):

The Mahayana takes the concept of anatta and extends that to the development of compassion for all things, since there really is no separation between self and other. An image that conveys this most beautifully is Shantideva’s concept of the entire world being comparable to a single organism, a body. He says that just as when the foot is in pain, the hand will spontaneously reach out to assuage the pain of the foot, in the same way—if you are no longer inhibited by self-centeredness—you will spontaneously reach out to assuage the pain of others. That metaphor beautifully conveys the central insight of Mahayana Buddhism: Once the self is seen through, it does not just mean liberation, but also that your spontaneous response to others becomes that of a profound empathy. You recognize that who you are is not because of some kind of metaphysical substance or essence that is tucked away inside you somewhere, but rather is determined by the unrepeatable matrix of relationships that constitute your own history.

I kind of get that on one level - and the whole "we are all one" has an appeal in the way it aligns (metaphorically, at least) with quantum entanglement.   But it doesn't seem to me that it makes sense to say that the compassion is a "spontaneous response" in the way alleged.

One day I'll get it - or not!

Oh, and I suppose I should end in the somewhat rambling entry on ego death, and its connection with religions and hallucinogens, at Wikipedia.  It does end on this note:

Scholars have also criticized Leary and Alpert's attempt to tie ego-death and psychedelics with Tibetan Buddhism. John Myrdhin Reynolds, has disputed Leary and Jung's use of the Evans-Wentz's translation of the Tibetan Book of the Dead, arguing that it introduces a number of misunderstandings about Dzogchen.^[89] Reynolds argues that Evans-Wentz's was not familiar with Tibetan Buddhism,^[89] and that his view of Tibetan Buddhism was "fundamentally neither Tibetan nor Buddhist, but Theosophical and Vedantist".^[90] Nonetheless, Reynolds confirms that the nonsubstantiality of the ego is the ultimate goal of the Hinayana system.^[91]

  

The malleable world of psychiatric diagnosis

Hey, a decent and interesting article at Slate about an issue I hadn't really been aware of:

Today there are about 3.3 million Americans with a bipolar disorder diagnosis. Many experts think that this figure is an undercount of the true number of people living with the condition. As with any disorder, some diagnosable people are never seen by a clinician. And many patients who wind up with the label of bipolar disorder are initially misdiagnosed with unipolar depression.

But some psychiatrists think that the bipolar diagnosis has actually gone too far—that there is a large contingent of patients who have been slapped with a trendy label, the definition of bipolar having drifted far beyond its original meaning. Research indicates that false positives for bipolar disorder may be alarmingly common. In a landmark study published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry in 2008, more than half of bipolar patients who were reevaluated were determined to have been misdiagnosed. It’s possible that misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis are widespread issues—but the field continues to be divided on whether misdiagnosis is an issue at all.

Perhaps no topic in 21^st-century adolescent psychiatry has been more controversial than pediatric bipolar, a diagnosis that can be applied to kids as young as 5 who have severe problems with emotional control. Critics say the label pathologizes normal but challenging parts of growing up. Proponents say it’s a needed intervention for kids not helped by other means.

No matter their age, when a patient receives the diagnosis of bipolar disorder, they are usually routed toward prescription drugs and can be blocked off from other diagnoses—and therefore other avenues of treatment. Borderline personality disorder, neurodivergence, and ADHD can all be misdiagnosed as bipolar but have vastly different treatment regimens. The first two are often treated without meds.

The rest of the article, about how bipolar diagnoses really had a huge growth phase, but is now getting some pushback, is very interesting.   I hope it doesn't go behind a paywall...