Just noticed this tweet, which I would say is very effective (and super efficient) in explaining to the public that rail services in Brisbane (and elsewhere) are out for good reason.
I also think she presents very credibly during a natural disaster like this.
At least (one of the) fridges got cleaned out. I'm pretty sure that if this hadn't happened, in 30 years time, my kids when dealing with the last of their parent's deceased estate would have have been throwing out egg whites in a plastic freezer bag from 2012.
Update: power's back. Yay. (And ancient frozen egg whites collected in the rubbish today.)
The Bureau of Meteorology has been checking the rainfall data from the floods in south-east Queensland, revealing a string of broken records and a stunning amount of rain.
In the six days from 23 to 28 February, at least 33 places recorded more than one metre of rain,
including an astonishing 1.77 metres falling at Mount Glorious, just
east of Wivenhoe Dam that helps reduce flooding in the city.
Parts of south-east Queensland and north-east New South Wales had at least 2.5 times their average rainfall for the month, with some areas getting five times the average.
In Brisbane, 792.8mm
fell into the city rain gauge over the six days to 9am on 28 February,
which is above the previous six-day record of 655.8mm set in January
1974.
For the first time ever, the city had three consecutive days when more than 200mm fell. Before last month, there had only been eight previous days when the city had seen more than 200mm in one day.
The BoM national manager of climate services, Dr Karl Braganza, said this meant the city had received almost 80% of its annual average rainfall in only six days.
In northern New South Wales, several places in the northern rivers
region had daily totals above 500mm up to 9am on 28 February.
Braganza said preliminary analysis of rainfall in Lismore, which is
currently inundated, suggested more rain had fallen in the town than the
previous record in March 2017 when the remnants of Tropical Cyclone
Debbie passed through.
As I've been noting for years - climate change and its effect on rain and floods was the massively disruptive and costly effect that was not discussed enough in early talk about climate change, and just imagine how much worse it may get with another .5 to 1 degree temperature rise.
It seems the estimate for the repair time for power to houses in my neighbourhood has stretched out to Friday! I know this happened to other houses in my area in the 2011 floods (5 to 7 days with no power), but my particular neighbour only lost it for one day. Hence we were not particularly worried when it first went off yesterday morning.
Now, a friend has lent us a generator. Noisy, smelly things they are. But I think the idea is to run them for a couple of hours to get the fridge cold, then turn it off for an hour and don't open the fridge. We have eskys and plenty of ice too. And a gas stove (yah).
Speaking of gas stoves, I know they are getting so much bad PR for their health effects now, but I'll put on my populist "it didn't affect me, so it can't be so bad" hat now and mention that I grew up in a house with town gas and therefore a gas stove top and oven, in a rather small three bedroom house in which I sometimes shared with older brothers who would smoke in bed. (!) I have now lived in a house for nearly 20 years with a gas stove top from bottle gas.
No one in my family (6 siblings, and parents) ever suffered asthma or any lung disease*. Neither of my kids (now adults) suffered asthma. Same with allergies to anything (which I mention because of asthma's connection to allergy.)
Is it because I live in a warm climate, where kitchen windows are nearly always open during cooking? But my life experience is not consistent with "gas is really bad for health".
Anyway, back to the floods. This report concentrated mostly on suburbs on my side of town, so I'll put it here.
The estimate of the number of houses affected seems to be about 15,000 to 20,000.
But the Lismore flood is more remarkable - highest known historical flood exceeded by 2m! I mean, that's really incredible.
* Whoops - I forgot that I had included both parents in that explanation, but my father did die of lung cancer. However, he was a life long smoker who gave up only a few years before the cancer was diagnosed. All of my brothers eventually gave up smoking - I think by their 40's at the latest.
Here's a question: why does Murdoch, or anyone with their head on right, consider Piers Morgan a "star". He's always been shallow, and I have always found him instantly dislikeable.
By the way, Morrison did turn up in Brisbane yesterday afternoon, and did an underwhelming TV appearance. I think everyone seeing it probably thought "you're only here because of Hawaii." Amusingly, I didn't see his visit even covered on the evening news, which I'm sure must have irritated his minders a lot.
I'm sick of having to constantly delete Graeme Bird's anti-Semitic conspiracy comments, which are at full blown fever level due to the situation in Ukraine.
So all comments are going into moderation for now.
Well, seems I'll be living through the third major Brisbane flood in my life time. It has been extremely wet in the Western suburbs today, and the promised move of the worst of the rain band to the south of the city just never seems to happen.
More news tomorrow...
Update: Anyone who has lived in Brisbane for a long time would agree the weather yesterday was very unusual. We're used to storms that whip through in the space of 30 minutes to an hour, dump a huge amount of rain, and are gone. What we don't see much is systems that produce thundery slow storms that hang around for, like, 6 to 9 hours? The rain just kept coming yesterday, with only occasional slow downs in rate. Mostly, steady heavy rain with bursts of "torrential".
As with 2011, it's kind of weird. If you can get to an unaffected suburban shopping centre, you wouldn't necessarily know how bad the flood affected parts are going. But roads are cut everywhere:
The flooding in my area (which is close to the river) is not a high as 2011, but there are businesses and houses well under. Unexpectedly, the power has gone off at home due to flood damage. (As per 2011, when it was off for a day.) But other streets not far away still have power, which seems odd.
I have read someone saying that it was a record 3 day rainfall event, but haven't seen that confirmed yet.
Anyway, what a weekend for doom scrolling - floods and the threat of nuclear war....
So, I wonder what made Tucker Carlson start to walk back his pro-Putin performance art? A self realisation it's untenable when images of dead and distressed civilians turn on TV? A Murdoch family member telling him to wind it back?
But of course, he's not the only one now trying to square supporting Putin but not his war.
Of course, Dinesh would be completely on board with the wingnut Right's "moral" panic (actually, it's more like a group psychopathology) about there being no Real Men running the West anymore.
This guy makes the obvious point that no fatuous " but if only the West had shown some strength" complainers never mention:
I thought Helen Dale, self confessed Ukraine expert, would have some bad take related to the war there.
She didn't disappoint:
The photo, she fails to explain (but one of the tweets following does) is from a 2015 article about how there was some consternation that some ROTC members (college cadets) had done this walk event as part of Sexual Assault Awareness Month, without authorisation.
Yeah, a real crisis of masculinity (and damning evidence that the entire US military is just emasculated weaklings now) on display there.
Why are libertarian types so obsessed with masculinity? Even queer ones like Dale?
Beyond the pathetic culture war take, she seems to also be in on the "let's have my cake and eat it too" camp - juggling "don't get into wars you can't win" with "the West is just so weak now" in her vacuous head.
How depraved is this, from supposed Catholic Currency Lad:
A revanchist pseudo-Czar only gets one
Joe Biden in a lifetime and Vladimir Putin has had his. The two men are
equals, morally, but Putin has an edge – only measurable by micrometer,
granted – for sincerity. I don’t believe the United States can survive
as a recognisable iteration of itself if Biden remains in office till
January, 2024. Compare this situation to, say, 1982. Had Ronald Reagan
become incapacitated in that year, George H.W. Bush was ready to step
in.
In the next paragraph, he says that there is no point in committing Western troops to the battle, as there is no "serious prospect of success".
So, it would have been wrong for any President to go to war over this, but he's sure that a Reagan (or Trump - with actual runs on the card for never wanting to commit American troops to a Euro war) would have just had to puff out their chest and Russia would have meekly left? It's such a fantasy land they live in.
I'm not sure how many on the wingnut Right actually agree with the extremes of the Tucker Carlson line, which is to effectively advocate the West doing nothing at all - not even sanctions - against Russia and Putin. (He declared weeks ago he was "on Russia's side", and is telling his fans to be very, very upset when sanctions lead to more expensive petrol. A real American patriot.)
I mean, we all know many of them admire Putin for culture war reasons, but I still think the majority know it's not a good look to actually shrug your shoulders (or make clear your support) for unprovoked military excursions of this kind.
So I think the more common line is to not offer an endorsement of the invasion per se (Morrow, Connolly, the execrable Brendan O'Neill) but to nonetheless run the line "ha, the West is so weak, decadent and absorbed in identity politics it was like an invitation to Putin", while simultaneously being a supporter of Trump and his America First isolationism.
They want the West (or Europe alone, who knows?) to be both "strong" and sabre rattling, while simultaneously always complaining about how bad the neo cons were for getting involved in unnecessary wars that ultimately failed. Here's the motormouth Brendan O'Neill today, for example:
Weak Western leaders like Joe Biden pose as the saviours of the Ukrainian people while making it clear that they won’t take any firm action to actually defend Ukraine. Putin is picking up on this incoherence, and exploiting it, says Brendan O’Neill
Military interventionists, both of the "neocon"
and "humanitarian" variety, never learn. Over the past 10 to 15 years,
not a single one of their interventions has delivered democracy to a
tyrant-hit hotspot, or liberated a people from bondage. Instead they
have inflamed and intensified conflict and led to the deaths of hundreds
of thousands of people. And yet, blinded by the narcissistic and
deluded belief that they have the power to free people from tyranny,
both left-leaning and rightwing interventionists continue to call for
more "wars of liberation", for one more chance to prove that their bombs
and bloodshed really can spread freedom around the globe.
This is what decades of culture warring does to the brain - it doesn't matter if your political "enemy" actually agrees with you on what to do to a present problem - you just shred consistency and strawman your way into "it's all your fault, always."
PS - another example that is irritating to watch - the praising of Trump for telling Merkel she shouldn't be dealing commercially with the Russians, while ignoring the fact that Trump spent years trying to get a hotel in Moscow, and lied about still actively trying to do so during his first Presidential campaign.