Sinclair Davidson and 10 years of wrong

Yes!!   Today is the 10 year anniversary of this article by Sinclair Davidson, published at the ABC and still available there, I suppose as a public service to show which economists are best ignored:

Stagflation looms for the Australian economy

The photo, by the way, is a screenshot (with a minor but accurate addition) from an appearance on the ABC - I wonder what year they stopped having him on anything, and the relationship between that and his pet hobby of trying to get the wingnut conservative membership of the Liberal Party to force the government to stop funding it.   Is it all a plot to hide this really, really wrong call?  Because this is what inflation actually looked like after 2011:

Looking around the internet, I see that his influence amongst other economists might also have diminished by, you know, sounding like a jerk in interactions with them.  Look at this exchange that still comes up in a search of a Catallaxy thread:

I don't think Peter Whiteford - who strikes me as one of the politest economists around - bothered with engaging further.

There's also this old post by monty about being banned in 2014 for reminding Sinclair that his stagflation call was obviously a dud.   I get a mention in it too (as well making a comment which remains entirely accurate.)  Monty is now back at Catallaxy, pretty much as the one pet troll.  (Sorry, monty, but that's the way it seems.)   Other people who make the occasional appearance to tell the throng of commenters that they are gullible and foolish and part of a self-gaslite cult regarding Trump still get the boot.   It's Sinclair's little club of Australian wingnut commentators and he won't have anyone, except for one participant, be there to tell them they're being idiots, even though that is what the rest spend their time doing (and much, much worse - many share the view that anyone to the Left of them is literally evil) against their perceived political and cultural enemies.   

The comment I made at the last link still has no answer - and if anything, the puzzle has only gotten worse.

The blog, for example, now routinely features posts by CL which dismiss COVID as a serious problem and pooh pooh vaccination.   Steve Kates, a hopeless nut in love with Trump, is similarly forever posting bullshit from Fox News and other Right wing news sources about vaccination dangers.   Yet Sinclair Davidson made a comment in a post that he considers vaccination the only way out of the current cycle of lockdowns.

So why does he let a blog that he can control actually read like a Right wing anti COVID  vax site?   Does he think providing an outlet for people who are hopeless victims of culture war driven Right wing media agendas is that important?    Why does he think he has to be part of an information outlet that promulgates ideas that he thinks are wrong?   

It's weird.   I suspect sometimes it's the same as a lot of wingnut behaviour -  a case of  being happy to hurt himself to own the libs.   He has made occasional reference to some trouble he got into with (I think) RMIT some years ago, but I never heard or read anywhere what it was about.   I thought it would quite possibly be to with something that appeared at Catallaxy, but I could be wrong.  (He has let appallingly racist, homophobic, sexist and defamatory comments stay in the threads for years.)   Anyway, I assume it was some sort of quasi disciplinary action about the appropriateness of stuff he could be associated with as a member of RMIT staff, and he survived.   I would love to know the details.  Anyone with knowledge, you can always tell us anonymously in comments!

So, did that experience make him want to up the ante, so to speak, with what Catallaxy could get away with?   Because it has become nuttier and nuttier, following the path of the terrible state of US Right wing politics, over the years, and he clearly will not use any editorial control even on something like the anti-vax line taken by some of his most popular contributors.   

What a weird way to behave - actually against the public interest and what he believes in.  But congratulations on making the world a stupider place, all in the name of free speech.  

BIG UPDATE:   not long after posting this, I noticed that Sinclair has posted that Catallaxy is closing down.

This is undoubtedly a Good Thing.   A blog that has promulgated ideologically driven climate change denial as one of its core functions for (I don't know) 15 or so years - and refuses to ever concede error on that -  is against the public interest.   And that's not to mention the myriad ways it has been offensive and corruptive of civil discourse on political and cultural matters.   

He could have set rules and at least tried to enforced them, but wouldn't.  It's a wonder he hasn't gotten into legal trouble over thousands of comments.   I don't know why he would let his own reputation be sullied by having control of a blog in which racism, homophobia and really intense sexism can run free.   

So, good riddance to bad rubbish.

Tibet and bones

My recent post about old Tibetan rituals involving skulls, excrement and sex has led to some further self education about odd aspects of Tibetan religious practice.   

But first - let's watch someone who looks like China's very own Henry Ergas explain (by very clearly reading from the script) the importance of Xi Jinping's recent visit to the country.   It's from CGTN, so of course it's 100% unadulterated pro-China propaganda; but I must admit, the country is looking cleaner and more modern than I expected:

 

OK, back to esoteric religious stuff.

I didn't know much about how Tibetan religious practice was so heavily into human skulls and bones.   But look at this image, which comes from what seems to be one guy's pet project - a website with the impressively prosaic name Facts and Details:  

It's captioned "Skull Queen of Heaven", but I don't know where it's originally from.   I suppose I  can do a reverse  image search - well, I just did, and it's still not clear.  It appears on some Himalayan art resources site as if it's in a private collection.  The image has been used by various other people too, presumably without authorisation, so it remains a bit of a mystery.

 

Anyhow,  it's presumably a fancy version of a kapala, which, as Wikipedia explains: 

 A kapala (Sanskrit for "skull") is a skull cup used as a ritual implement (bowl) in both Hindu Tantra and Buddhist Tantra (Vajrayana). Especially in Tibet, they are often carved or elaborately mounted with precious metals and jewels.

 

 

 

 

Googling the topic further, here's an old leaflet from 1923 Use of Human Skulls and Bones in Tibet which goes into plenty of gory detail about the history of this.  Let's see if I can copy some bits:

 

Well, surely the "sky burial" was doubtless real - just the detail of boiling up Dad's head and drinking from it might be the exaggeration?

Anyway, the leaflet actually goes on to record lots of different societies which have used skulls for cups - sometimes from their defeated enemies' heads; sometimes a relative they liked.  Even Australia gets a mention!:

But back to why Tibetan Buddhism does it:

Well, I suppose that is one way of remembering life is temporary and you'd better behave.

The leaflet describes the Tibetan interest in getting just the right type of skull for worship purposes:

 

The leaflet does point out, though, that it is not completely unknown for a Catholic saint's skull to be used for ceremonial drinking on their feast day in Europe, so let's not be too condescending.   

Anyway, to end on a lighter note, I see from Facts and Details that the most common chant used in Tibet is one that is pretty easy to remember, but the English translation seems very long!:

The most common chant is om mani padme hum ("Hail to the Jewel in the Lotus"), which means "I invoke this path to experience the universality, so the jewel-like luminosity of my immortal mind will be unfolded within the depths of the lotus-center of awakened consciousness and I be wafted by ecstacy of breaking through all bonds and horizons."

It is the mantra of Chenresig (Avalokiteshvara), the Bodhisattva of Compassion.

I like the long version. 

The audit's going that well, hey?

From a recent report at Gizmodo about the crank led Arizona audit that has had dumb Trump cultists excited:

The Republican official serving as the Senate’s point man on the audit, former Arizona secretary of state Ken Bennett, recently leaked initial audit results showing the county’s original count was accurate and found himself locked out of the audit facility for days as a result, according to Vice. While Bennett told Vice he was trying to “work things out with [Senate] President Fann” and resume his role, in recent interviews he had also detailed being shut out of Cyber Ninja’s audit processes and admitted he had threatened to resign. He also suggested the firm might “force balance” their report, an accounting term for maliciously cooking the books with fake data. (As Slate noted, Bennett’s last-minute flip after months of promoting misinformation about the Maricopa County vote reeks of distancing himself from the disaster.)

At least two Senate Republicans who are responsible for helping bring the ongoing debacle about are starting to have second thoughts. 

 Scottsdale State Senator Michelle Ugenti-Rita recently tweeted “it’s become clear that the audit has been botched” thanks to the “incompetence” of Fann, ABC 15 reported. Phoenix-Glendale State Senator Paul Boyer told the network he agreed, but had a disingenuous excuse: Republicans had supported the audit but “just didn’t think it would be done by a firm that didn’t have a clue of what they were doing.”

The faith based cultists will always have the "but they didn't disclose everything" line to take.  "The routers - what about the routers?"

Update:   dover beach, a long time commenter at Catallaxy, found that conservative Catholicism just wasn't enough faith for him, so he signed up to the Trump cult.  In cult world, attempts to limit the spread of invented disinformation is evidence that it must be true:

   

Out of Germany?

According to The Guardian:

A German-based conspiracy group helped to drive a series of anti-lockdown protests across Australia which saw dozens of people arrested and hundreds fined after violent clashes with police.

Police arrested more than 60 people and fined 107 more after a crowd of about 3,000 gathered in Sydney on Saturday to protest against the city’s lockdown.

Coordinated by a loose network of conspiracy-laced groups, including some with links to the far right, rallies took place in cities across Australia and the globe, with violent clashes between demonstrators and police in Sydney.

Protests against Covid restrictions have become common throughout the pandemic. While billed as peaceful protests, police said they were surprised by “the level of violence that people were prepared to use”.

Prior to Saturday, word of the protests was spread through a collection of Telegram, Instagram and Facebook posts, often amplified by large anti-vaccination and conspiracy pages that have amassed followings in the tens of thousands during the pandemic.

The latest rallies have highlighted the role of a German-based group, named Worldwide Demonstration, which has helped to coordinate protests across the globe, including in various Australian cities.

The group has 45,000 Facebook followers and 70,000 Telegram subscribers on its main accounts alone, and even more on dedicated accounts set up for individual countries.

The group appears to be run out of Germany by individuals calling themselves “Freie Bürger Kassel”, or the Free Citizens of Kassel. Its main Facebook page is administered by two Germans and a third individual in the United Kingdom.

 

 

Baby drama

Hey I've never tried to embed something from Reddit before.  Maybe this is old - I don't know - but I haven't seen it before:

 

Go to jail

If the appeal court doesn't increase this sentence, I would be very surprised:   

A Melbourne man who ejaculated on women at music festivals will not spend a moment behind bars or be registered as a sex offender.

Muhammad Bilal Khan, 40, today narrowly avoided jail in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court for crimes which his victims said left them feeling unclean and uncomfortable in their own skin.

Instead, the father of two was given a community-based order and 250 hours of unpaid work, a sentence which prosecutors are already considering appealing.

He pleaded guilty to three sex assault charges and another of indecent assault.

The court heard he was supported by his wife, who said she was proud to describe her husband as "a man of high moral standards, strong values and decency".

But Magistrate Tara Hartnett said that description was contradicted by the offending against his victims.

"It was despicable conduct by you and purely for your own gratification," she said.

That's a nuttily devoted wife there, too.

He did it four separate times over 4 years.   Of course someone who does that, repeatedly, needs to be registered as a sex offender.   And to serve time.

 

The wedding reception's going to be interesting

I think Matthew Gertz is the guy who keeps getting mistaken for Matt Gaetz, so he tweets about him often:

 

 

Keep it away from me

I agree entirely with this sentiment:

 Some amusing Twitter comments follow:

 You really do have to be of a certain age to know the tune to sing the last one to. 

The loathesome Creighton

I cannot be the only person who is just daily appalled by Adam Creighton and his Twitter coverage about  COVID.    His arrogant mocking tone and completely unwarranted, ideologically drive, certainty that he has been right all along is just a journalistic and personal disgrace, and I hope he has (at the very least) lost friends permanently over it.   (He will have more in the wingnut Right - he can have them.)   He's like an Australian version of that utterly obnoxious, can-someone-please-punch-him-in-the-face Paul Joseph Watson. 

His latest piece of triumphalism is gloating over the apparent rapid drop in UK cases, against expectations.  This does appear genuinely puzzling, as this article in The Guardian notes.     But as I have said for a long time - this has just obviously been a really complicated pandemic, with lots of puzzles that are not going to be fully understood for some time, such as why it took off so fast in some places, and slower in some poorer countries where one might have expected an earlier outbreak; the effectiveness of the various policy responses in different countries; and the extent of "long Covid" and whether it is going to lead to an increase in things as diverse as diabetes, dementia and male infertility and erectile dysfunction (!) 

If ever there was a person who deserves to get it, and suffer badly from it, it's Adam. 

Some religious people had too much time on their hands

I don't know, but I think some people in India and Tibet with religious interests really had too much time on their hands.   From an article with the somewhat worrying title:  Tapping the Body's Nectar: Gastronomy and Incorporation in Tibetan Literature, I extract the following:

This essay will present a set of thirteenth-century Tibetan texts that pre-
scribe the consumption of human by-products—such as flesh, excrement,
or urine—and consider several discursive contexts in which these pre-
scriptions may be understood.....

 A gastronomic discourse of consuming human flesh and other body
products, prepared following recipes targeted at achieving siddhi and other
supernormal aims, is central to the Tibetan corpus of Nyingma tantras,
many of which are said to be based on indigenous Tibetan writings and
on transmissions that occurred during the first diffusion of Buddhism into
Tibet, during the eighth to the ninth centuries....

The Nectar Tantras collection is attributed to Vimalamitra, an Indian
who is said to have spent many years in Tibet around the turn of the
eighth to the ninth centuries and who is considered a central figure in the
transmission and dissemination of Mahayoga and early Great Perfection
(Rdzogs chen) teachings in Tibet. ...

Ok, now for some explicit instructions:

 The Eight Chapters on Nectar’s central practice involves the creation
of nectar by consecrating a brew of fluids said to emerge from sexual union
and various other ingredients. The sixth of the eight chapters contains ex-
plicit instructions on how to make nectar (bdud rtsi sbyor ba). Selecting
and purifying a suitable place, the text says, the practitioner should make
a mandala; it should be covered with excrement and urine, with five hu-
man skulls placed at the cardinal points and in the center and lit with a
lamp fueled by human fat. The practitioner should obtain the skull of a
Brahmin and place it at the mandala’s center, filled with five “fragrant
nectars” (that is, the five human by-products or products designated as
their substitutes). To that mixture a number of fruit, plant, and mineral
ingredients are to be added, as well as the five meats and the five sub-
stances that are extruded by the sense organs (the eyes, nose, ears, tongue,
and heart). More ingredients are added to the concoction: grapes, wood-
apple, mango, jackfruit, cinnamon, cardamom, nutmeg, cloves, and so
forth, plus the powder of ground-up gold, silver, copper, iron, and tur-
quoise. As the practitioner stirs this brew, he (the text presupposes a male)
chants mantras. “The excellent nectar mixed from these [ingredients] is
certain to bestow the fruits of siddhi,” the tantra asserts.

Once the practitioner has mixed his brew of nectar, he should next take
up the identity of a wrathful Heruka, he should be joined by a consort,
and the pair should engage in sexual intercourse. At this point, the text
promises, “You will achieve facility with the vastness [of Buddhahood] and
its causal conditions, and you will arrive at the samadhi of the peaceful
dharmakaya. You will become possessed of the eight worldly siddhi and
attain the empowerment of ultimate truth.”10 This ritual should be con-
ducted while the female is menstruating, and the mixture of her blood and
his semen is referred to as “the best rasayana [ra sa ya na’i gtso bo].”11
Instructions for a contemplative exercise follow. 

When the blood and  semen meet, at the five power places (gnas lnga) of the body (the crown
of the head, the tongue, the heart, the navel, and the genitals) the prac-
titioner should imagine five luminous seed syllables and five Buddhas ra-
diating light. As the light rays contract, the practitioner should grab hold
of these “five medicines” (sman lnga) for himself. The five nectars here
are each associated with a Buddha and his seed syllable: Vairocana with
excrement, Amitabha with bodhicitta, Amoghasiddhi with flesh, Ratna-
sambhava with blood, and Aksobhya with urine.12 The seed syllables then
melt into five streams of the five nectars. Repeating this visualization
many times, together with mantra recitation and hand gestures, the prac-
titioner consecrates the nectar vessel at the center of the mandala by rest-
ing his hand on its top.

I haven't heard the Dalai Lama talking up this aspect of his region's religious history.  I wonder why...

PS:  It's all a bit Temple of Doom, the imagery, I reckon.   And how come Christianity never got into sex magic rituals.  A disappointing oversight.  :)

Update:    yet more from that article, which makes going to the doctor in Tibet at the time sound like a real worry:

Gu ru chos dbang’s Accomplishing Medicine Applications (Sman bsgrub
las tshogs) offers a range of practically oriented recipes for the use of
consecrated nectar to achieve various aims. He provides a general recipe
for combining the five nectars into a concoction that may then be used as
a base ingredient for more elaborate prescriptions: “Six liters [bre] of
nectar [bdud rtsi, that is, excrement], a handful of human flesh, one
palmful of blood, half of that of white bodhicitta bezoar [go ro tsa na],
and however much urine is appropriate.”19 Recommended sources for
collecting these ingredients are provided: for example, the bodhicitta may
be the brains of a sixteen-year-old child, the blood may come from your
lama’s consort, caretaker, or female student, and the urine may be taken
from a young child born to your lama and his consort.20 ....

Following the general recipe above, Gu ru chos dbang offers a series
of prescriptions for mixtures that cure illness or enhance personal health
and power. Thus, if you mix the juice-like nectar with more than thirty
additional ingredients, including turmeric, a tooth tip, bitumen, white
aconite (bong nga), barberry bark, camphor, a young boy’s bezoar, and
various other medicinal substances, then this compound may be used to
treat contagious diseases or poisons. Adding calcite (cong zhi), pitch (brag
zhun), saffron, bal bu leaves, the three salts, pomegranate, and the flesh
of a lammergeyer to a handful of nectar will clear up bladder disease.

What the heck is a lammergeyer?   Oh - a bearded vulture, by the looks.   And "a young boy's bezoar"?  

A bezoar (BE-zor) is a solid mass of indigestible material that accumulates in your digestive tract, sometimes causing a blockage. Bezoars usually form in the stomach, sometimes in the small intestine or, rarely, the large intestine. They can occur in children and adults.

I had not heard of that before.   I wonder how you get a small boy's one in Tibet in the 13th century.  I don't want to know.

The tricky concept of self esteem

From an interesting article in The Atlantic:

What should parents do to foster healthy self-esteem in their kids? We should stop obsessing over the concept, because it is probably not the be-all and end-all that we think it is. According to Cho, research has shown, for instance, that many East Asian children score low on traditional self-esteem measures, but that they rarely suffer from psychological problems or do poorly in school as a result. This suggests that “self-esteem is just one thing in a myriad of practices that parents can engage in that could help children thrive,” Cho said. We’re not going to ruin our kids by not focusing on it—and we might even help them, given that our approaches for boosting self-esteem are often counterproductive.  

 We should also be careful about showering our children with indiscriminate praise. Instead, we should be more honest in our appraisals—not by shaming kids or putting them down, but by giving them feedback that is commensurate with their effort. Tell your kid that you like their off-key singing, but don’t tell them it’s the most beautiful thing you’ve ever heard. When we praise our kids, we should encourage their efforts, rather than celebrate them for their achievements, abilities, or smarts. And we should let them experience hardships. When kids face adversity and get through it, they learn that they are loved unconditionally and that failure is not a sign of ineptitude, but an opportunity to learn, grow, and come to believe in themselves.

In an earlier paragraph:

Healthy self-esteem cannot be universally essential for another reason too: It is largely an American construct. Many other countries, including Japan and China, do not give self-esteem much, if any, consideration (some languages don’t even have a word for it). “Even in very modern societies, cultures that we think are very similar to ours don’t necessarily view self-esteem with the same set of ideals that we do,” Cho told me.

The overlap has always been obvious

As David Roberts notes:

This photo from the Sydney protest has featured on Twitter a lot:

I have the impression that the scale of the weekend protests caught people by surprise - the Right wingnuts in the open thread at Catallaxy, for example, were sympathetic to it but few seemed to have been aware that it was going to happen.  The main avenue for its organisation (probably Facebook?) would be good to know.   Just another example of the unforeseen damage the internet has caused.

Over in England, meanwhile:

Further down that thread:

Let's have a look at the Right wing paranoia that Lew Wallace suffers from:

On the other hand, there is an element of truth in this:

But the problem I keep coming back to is the way the internet has enabled faster communication between the nutters, enabling better organisation, the faster spread of falsehoods, and a sense of community that they interpret as meaning they can't be wrong, because so many others think the same.

 

Sandwiching discussed

I see that this was being discussed in 2019, but it has become more relevant than ever before:

Free love as an anti-Nazi measure

The New Yorker has been promoting this story on Twitter:  

The German Experiment That Placed Foster Children with Pedophiles

With the approval of the government, a renowned sexologist ran a dangerous program. How could this happen?

and it's an interesting read, especially for the part that explains post War German theorising about how to have less authoritarian friendly personalities ever again.   I'm not sure I have ever heard of this in such detail before.

I won't extract too much, but it notes that the sexologist in question, Kentler, was a gay man who had father issues - Dad was a domineering jerk, following earlier ideas about how to raise kids, especially boys:

Kentler’s parents followed the teachings of Daniel Gottlob Moritz Schreber, a best-selling German authority on child care who has been described as a “spiritual precursor of Nazism.” Schreber outlined principles of child rearing that would create a stronger race of men, ridding them of cowardice, laziness, and unwanted displays of vulnerability and desire. “Suppress everything in the child,” Schreber wrote, in 1858. “Emotions must be suffocated in their seed right away.”

Then, according to this article, in the immediate post War years, sexual propriety was culturally significant as a type of "penance":

The postwar years in West Germany were marked by an intense preoccupation with sexual propriety, as if decorum could solve the nation’s moral crisis and cleanse it of guilt. “One’s own offspring did penance for Auschwitz,” the German poet Olav Münzberg wrote, “with ethics and morality forcefully jammed into them.” Women’s reproductive rights were severely restricted, and the policing of homosexual encounters, a hallmark of Nazism, persisted; in the two decades after the war, roughly a hundred thousand men were prosecuted for this crime. Kentler was attracted to men and felt as if he “always had one leg in prison,” because of the risks involved in consummating his desires. He found solace in the book “Corydon,” by André Gide, a series of Socratic dialogues about the naturalness of queer love.

Kentler went on to promote a laissez faire attitude to sex as the solution (a idea which did have a very 70's, countercultural, type of vibe):

He earned a doctorate in social education from the University of Hanover, publishing his dissertation, a guidebook called “Parents Learn Sex Education,” in 1975. He was inspired by the Marxist psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich, who had argued that the free flow of sexual energy was essential to building a new kind of society. Kentler’s dissertation urged parents to teach their children that they should never be ashamed of their desires. “Once the first feelings of shame exist, they multiply easily and expand into all areas of life,” he wrote.

OK, here's the key part about theories about sexual repression and fascism:

Like many of his contemporaries, Kentler came to believe that sexual repression was key to understanding the Fascist consciousness. In 1977, the sociologist Klaus Theweleit published “Male Fantasies,” a two-volume book that drew on the diaries of German paramilitary fighters and concluded that their inhibited drives—along with a fear of anything gooey, gushing, or smelly—had been channelled into a new outlet: destruction. When Kentler read “Male Fantasies,” he could see Schreber, the child-care author whose principles his parents had followed, “at work everywhere,” he wrote. Kentler argued that ideas like Schreber’s (he had been so widely read that one book went through forty editions) had poisoned three generations of Germans, creating “authoritarian personalities who have to identify with a ‘great man’ around them to feel great themselves.” Kentler’s goal was to develop a child-rearing philosophy for a new kind of German man. Sexual liberation, he wrote, was the best way to “prevent another Auschwitz.”

The trials of twenty-two former Auschwitz officers had revealed a common personality type: ordinary, conservative, sexually inhibited, and preoccupied with bourgeois morality. “I do think that in a society that was more free about sexuality, Auschwitz could not have happened,” the German legal scholar Herbert Jäger said. Sexual emancipation was integral to student movements throughout Western Europe, but the pleas were more pitched in Germany, where the memory of genocide had become inextricably—if not entirely accurately—linked with sexual primness. In “Sex After Fascism,” the historian Dagmar Herzog describes how, in Germany, conflicts over sexual mores became “an important site for managing the memory of Nazism.” But, she adds, it was also a way “to redirect moral debate away from the problem of complicity in mass murder and toward a narrowed conception of morality as solely concerned with sex.”

Suddenly, it seemed as if all relationship structures could—and must—be reconfigured, if there was any hope of producing a generation less damaged than the previous one. In the late sixties, educators in more than thirty German cities and towns began establishing experimental day-care centers, where children were encouraged to be naked and to explore one another’s bodies. “There is no question that they were trying (in a desperate sort of neo-Rousseauian authoritarian antiauthoritarianism) to remake German/human nature,” Herzog writes. Kentler inserted himself into a movement that was urgently working to undo the sexual legacy of Fascism but struggling to differentiate among various taboos. In 1976, the magazine Das Blatt argued that forbidden sexual desire, such as that for children, was the “revolutionary event that turns our everyday life on its head, that lets feelings break out and that shatters the basis of our thinking.” A few years later, Germany’s newly established Green Party, which brought together antiwar protesters, environmental activists, and veterans of the student movement, tried to address the “oppression of children’s sexuality.” Members of the Party advocated abolishing the age of consent for sex between children and adults.

The only thing I am unsure about is that I am not sure how it fits in with Germany having a reputation for sexual liberation in the early part of the 20th century.  Or was that just a city thing, eschewed by clean living country folk?   Here's a couple of extraordinary paragraphs out of the (rather specific!) Wikipedia entry European Sexuality leading up to and during World War 2:

Within Germany in the 1930s, many German Protestants and Catholics shared the view that Jewish people were responsible for the sexual immorality that pervaded Weimar Culture. Many church leaders supported the Nazis, welcoming radical measures against “public immorality” that included shutting down brothels, gay and lesbian bars, and nudist organizations.^[2] The initial support of the leadership of both the Catholic and Protestant churches was based on the belief that the Nazis would purify German sexual mores and reinstitute respect for family values.^[3]

In the early 1900s, Germany, and particularly Berlin, developed a reputation for relaxed sexual mores; as Dagmar Herzog writes in Sexuality In Europe: A Twentieth Century History, “There was more detailed discussion of the best techniques for enhancing female orgasm under Nazism than there would be in the far more conservative decade of the 1950s.”^[4] The flipside to liberalization for some was crackdowns on others.^[5] By the 1930s, Nazi leadership was increasingly anxious about being perceived as “queer”.^[6] In 1934, Hitler facilitated the murder of a friend and leader of the paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party, an openly gay man, Ernst Röhm. Until that time, many bars frequented by members of the Sturmabteilung were well known as gay bars, and there was no perceived tension between activism espousing greater rights for homosexuals and right-wing politics.^[7] The prevalence of same-sex institutions like Hitler Youth and the League of German Girls fostered suspicions of homoeroticism, and subsequently the regime tried to prove its straightness. All of that would change, however, when the virulently homophobic Heinrich Himmler became one of the most powerful people in the Reich.^[8] In 1935, Nazis strengthened laws on the books that criminalized male (but not female) homosexuality. Not only mutual masturbation but parallel individual masturbation and even “erotic” glances fell under the purview of the law.^[9] Penalties for homosexual behavior escalated considerably by 1937. By the end of the war, approximately 100,000 men had been prosecuted for same-sex behavior. Close to half had been convicted, sent to labor camps, prisons, or penitentiaries, subjected to medical experiments, or forced to have sex with female prostitutes.^[10] Many Jewish people who were held captive would realize a similar fate.^[11]

Gee.   Germany sure has a special, kinda weirdo, place in sexual cultural history.

   

Cold and COVID

My son got a head cold a few days ago, and dutifully went off and got Covid tested.  Came back negative.  Only lasted a few days. 

I seem to have developed one myself now.   No headache or pains:  just "normal" post nasal drip that I often get as the first sign of a head cold.   Throat's not really sore, just a bit irritated like you get with post nasal drip.

I'm suspecting it's not really worth get Covid tested.    I've managed to avoid the swab so far.  

What do you think?   

By the way:  I am an AstraZeneka resister.   Covid barely exists in Brisbane, with (I think) several days this week of no new cases; so it's not as if we are in the midst of a Delta outbreak.

I appreciate that you have to be very unlucky to get the blood clot problem from the vaccine:

In its latest weekly Vaccine Safety Report, the TGA said there have been 87 cases of clotting from the 6.1 million doses of AstraZeneca administered in Australia.

but that's one in 70,000 or so - and even though only a few of them have died, it seems those who get it still end up in hospital for weeks, and it's a very serious condition.  (I am not even sure whether they ever fully recover - the old guy who turned up on 7.30 a couple of weeks ago was out of  hospital but still on blood thinning drugs.)

When the virus isn't really circulating in my local city, and don't need to travel anywhere for a while, I don't really see it worth the risk of taking a medicine that carries a risk of making me seriously ill itself.

Don't get me wrong - if any other vaccine were available I would be in the line up as soon as possible.  

But in my circumstances (more so than if I were a resident of Sydney or Melbourne) I don't think holding off for now to wait to see if Pfizer will soon be available is unreasonable.

Who would want a country full of such nuts anyway?

Floods in China

I find it hard to believe that the people in the train were not in a bigger panic.   Very extraordinary scenes, worthy of a disaster movie:

As for floods and climate change, I wrote this back in 2013: 

...I have been saying since the extraordinarily widespread Australian floods of 2011  that increased flooding and drought may well be the first climate change effect which really becomes very clear and convinces government and voters that serious action on CO2 needs to be taken.  Recent events suggest I may be right.