Elon Musk hosts Russian asset

 

It's all in the eyes

I watched a video about the remarkable technological improvements in VR that are built into the Apple Vision Pro.   It does sound impressive - but I still have my doubts that this type of technology will ever be as widespread as Apple (or Meta) hopes.

Why?  Because I strongly suspect this is never going to be good for the eyes.   

I could be wrong about this, as now that I look it up, one short study done with a basic VR headset for 40 minute sessions in 2017 didn't come up with evidence that it would cause myopia - but it acknowledges that more study needs to be done.  

The problem is not only the risk of increasing myopia, especially in young people, but also the fact that once you need reading glasses, you have to get lens done that will allow you to use the VR headset clearly.  This is already a bit of an issue with me with using the cheapo phone headsets - because my eyes are different, although I could read clearly from one eye, the brain was still working overtime to deal with VR.   (It might be better now that I have had both eyes done for cataracts, and with the lens to allow for reading, rather than distance, without glasses; but one eye still is not quite as clear as the other.  It's fine for reading in bed, and even using my laptop, but with VR and the incredibly close distance the screen is to the eyes, I dunno...) 

Even apart from the issue of getting perfectly clear vision, I still doubt that using them for protracted periods, like all day at work, will ever not come without eyestrain.

I can imagine something like Google Glass being able to be used all day, as you are swapping all the time between near vision, and real distance vision (not the simulation of distance vision that Vision Pro will provide.)   (And also, glasses are just more comfortable in the way something bound to the face  like a ski mask isn't.)

So, I really have strong doubts about this...    

Update:  you can read a sceptical take on them by a journalist who tried them for half an hour, here.

As he says:

Over dinner, I talked to my wife about the Vision Pro. The Apple goggles, I said, looked and felt better than the competing headsets. But I wasn’t sure that mattered.

Other headsets from Meta and Sony PlayStation were much cheaper and already quite powerful and entertaining, especially for playing video games. But whenever we had guests over for dinner and they tried the goggles on, they lost interest after less than half an hour because the experience was exhausting and they felt socially disconnected from the group.

Would it matter if they could twist the dial on the front of the headset to see into the real world while wearing it? I suspect it would still feel isolating, because they would probably be the only person in a room wearing one.

Which is the bigger story today?

1.  The Institute of Family Studies confirms that, yeah, young people like to say they are bi.   But, funnily enough, they still prefer to have straight sex:

 

The term "lesbian until graduation" has been a joke for a very long time (I remember the first time I heard it was Libbi Gorr on one of her shows);  I think it is just more embraced than ever now...

2.   Some dude who used to have security clearance says the US, and other countries, have proof of exotic craft via at least recovered materials (and captured craft?).  But, it's just what he's been told.  He's never seen it.

I have two words for anybody getting too excited by this:  Michael Flynn.   By which I mean - of course being in the military with a high security clearance is no guarantee of not talking nonsense.

I find it all very hard to believe, in this digital world where leaks of documents and photos and video has become easier than ever.

Coward considered

There's a biographical article about Noel Coward up at the BBC.   I knew little of his background, and did not realise how incredibly successful he became at a young age, after having an early nervous breakdown that kept him out of World War 1:

From the age of 14, he had some sort of relationship with 36-year-old artist, Philip Streatfeild – possibly sexual – before Streatfeild died of trench fever in World War One. Coward's other close friend, John Ekins, also died in the war. In 1918, at the age of 18, Coward had a nervous breakdown in an army training camp before seeing any action, and was hospitalised for six weeks.  

"Coward is of the generation that came out of the First World War and the global pandemic of the Spanish Flu, and thought that the future was deeply bleak, with another war on the horizon," says Soden. 

How to deal with this bleakness? Sing and dance and laugh through it. Make-believe had always been Coward's escape: he'd been acting professionally from the age of 10, and even as a teenager was churning out plays and songs and novels. Boundless ambition was matched by determined graft. 

"He's spat out into the 1920s with this hole at the centre of his life which only fame and success can adequately fill," says Soden. "It's as if there can never be too much of it." And soon, there really was silly amounts. By 25, Coward was "more famous than the prime minister," says Soden, with four plays on in London in June 1925. He stormed the US, opening three plays on Broadway by the end of the year: The Vortex, Hay Fever, and Easy Virtue – the latter featuring another woman frank about her enjoyment of sex, and stifled by the disapproving and hypocritical upper-classes. 

By 1926, 3,000 productions of Coward's plays had been staged worldwide, and his annual income was estimated to be at least £50,000 (£15 million today). He had become the highest paid writer in the world, but the relentless schedule soon took its toll. In autumn 1926, Coward found himself unable to stop crying during a performance and collapsed in his dressing room afterwards.

While wary of offering posthumous diagnoses, Soden tentatively suggests that Coward may have had bipolar disorder. What is clear is that his life was marked by periods of "astonishingly manic activity, rehearsing nine to five, a show an evening, partying till 2am… and then he crumbles." 

He then did try to help the war effort in World War 2:

He ended up with several [war jobs]: spying for an underground new secret service, running a propaganda department in France, attempting to stealthily influence important Americans to support Britain and enter the war, even holding meetings in President Roosevelt's bedroom. 

It may have been his greatest role – all that mask wearing proving excellent practice for going undercover. The fact that no-one took him seriously was his "best qualification for being a spy," says Soden. But Coward was, arguably, too convincing: the press disparaged him for apparently jollying about in America while everyone else suffered, while his international playboy status was frequently seen as a liability by politicians. Both reactions deeply hurt Coward; war service was one area of life where he desperately wanted to be taken seriously.

So, he was certainly in the Bright Young Thing crowd in the 1920's.  Did Evelyn Waugh ever meet him, I wonder?   Ah - yes, he did:

He had lunch with Noel Coward (‘He has a simple, friendly nature. No brains’)

Ha.  

By the way, this article gives more (autobiographical) detail of Coward's near entry into the military in 1918.   It was not a simple case of "nervous breakdown" - and it was also at the very tail end of the war.    

More potted biography of Coward's war time efforts can be found in this article at The Guardian.  Surprisingly, there is an Australian connection, too, despite it being somewhat hard to fathom that a somewhat camp-ish demeanour would go over well in that era here:

He was immediately sent to Bletchley and seconded to D section, but was swiftly moved to Paris as head of the bureau of propaganda, a job that seemed to entail nothing more strenuous than dining with the beau monde. All this was viewed in Britain with understandable mystification; there were questions in the Commons about the usefulness of his activities. He persuaded Stuart to send him to the US, where, astonishingly, he had two meetings with Roosevelt. What appeared to be his triumphal progress through America caused a huge furore in England. He was seconded to British War Relief, but by now the US press was attacking him too, not least because of his first world war record.

He then went to Australia, where he received a gratifyingly ecstatic response; but was told that his wartime mission was suspended. This command can only have come from the highest level. His return to London was greeted by a hostile press, which seemed all of a piece with the requisitioning of his magnificent country house, Goldenhurst, and the bombing of his London home. He moved to the Savoy Hotel; there he found other similarly dispossessed chums such as Margot Asquith. The blitz was in full swing; he was now right at the centre of the British people's experience of war, though of course, in a very Noël Coward sort of way. Supping at the Savoy on a Saturday night in April 1941, he noted: "Had a few drinks. Pretty bad blitz, but not as bad as Wednesday. A couple of bombs fell very near during dinner. Wall bulged a bit and door blew in. Orchestra went on playing, no one stopped eating or talking. Blitz continued. Carroll Gibbons played the piano, I sang, so did Judy Campbell and a couple of drunken Scots Canadians. On the whole a strange and very amusing evening. People's behaviour absolutely magnificent. Much better than gallant. Wish the whole of America could really see and understand it. Thankful to God that I came back. Would not have missed this experience for anything."

 And finally, I guess a summary of his extremely active and often scandalous gay love/sex life is in order, and which outlet is better at that than the Daily Mail?   

Update:  Oh look!  The State Library of Queensland has a post about Coward's visit to Brisbane at the start of WW2.

I suppose I was being a bit facetious when I said above that it is hard imagining him being popular with Australian "diggers" given his camp reputation - the article seemingly confirms he was mobbed by women, and I do recall an anecdote in which he said he never wanted to "come out" because he had convinced so many middle aged women that he was worthy of being their heartthrob.   

The oddest line in the article is perhaps this:

The following day (21 November 1940) was also extremely busy for Coward . He was due to visit a Brisbane abattoir in the morning, however he decided to cancel this in favour of rehearsing for his afternoon concert. Coward politely told The Telegraph newspaper that "It was not because he particularly disliked abattoirs. He had seen lots of them in his time".

Where not to be gay

Axios ran an article about a Gallup poll which asked people in all sort of countries whether they thought their city or area was a "good" place for gay people to live.

While it pointed out that the general trend (compared to 10 years ago) was up - in fact, way up in places like India, Nepal and Vietnam (and even Poland!) - I'm more interested in the places where people say they're the pits for gay and lesbian.

Of course, we all know many African countries are very bad this way, but there are some other notably unfriendly to gay places: 

Gay People to Live in 2021

Is the city or area where you live a good place or not a good place to live for gay or lesbian people?

Malawi	3	95
Senegal	3	91
Armenia	4	81
Kazakhstan	4	66
Kyrgyzstan	6	73
Ghana	7	86
Kosovo	7	80
Zambia	7	82
Burkina Faso	8	83
Indonesia	8	88
Georgia	9	65
Nigeria	9	83
Tunisia	9	73

Wow, Indonesia really sticks out amongst the local areas.  

Still, the results are sometimes a bit puzzling:   I would not have expected these:

In 25 countries -- including China (47%), Greece (49%), Israel (45%) and Kenya (24%) -- perceptions of communities being good places for gay people to live grew by 10 or more percentage points from 2011 to 2021; still, less than half in these countries say their area is a good place.

I wouldn't have expected China to be that high, but would have guessed Greece and Israel's results to be higher.

Australia ranks at 86%, by the way.   Pretty much identical with Canada and New Zealand.  USA is at 80%, and given the state of politics there, it makes sense that they would rank lower.

Anyway, somewhat interesting...

 

Dumb stuff on Twitter

Maybe I re-arrange these later...

At last, some cultured meat scepticism has arrived

I was ahead of the curve on this one.   This article up at the BCC shows that some scepticism has finally entered the commentary on the potential for lab grown meat:

Why cultivated meat is still so hard to find in restaurants

It's a good read.

I note that George Monbiot's promotion of microbial production of protein ("precision fermentation" of animal proteins) is not attracting all that much attention, yet.   Maybe the problem is a lack of good examples of products?  I see there is also some skepticism around the ability to scale it economically, but I strongly suspect that it is much more do-able than growing animal cells in expensive nutrient, and arranging them into something resembling meat. 

Reasons for suicides investigated

Yes, I would say this is worthwhile research:

Cory Russo, the chief death investigator in Utah, is used to asking strangers questions at the most excruciating moments of their lives. When she shows up at the scene of a suicide, a homicide or another type of unexpected death, her job is to interview the grievers about how the deceased had lived.

How old were they? What was their race? Did they have a job? Had they ever been hospitalized for psychiatric issues? How had they been feeling that morning?

Over the past couple of years, she has added new questions to the list: What was their sexual orientation? What was their gender identity?

Ms. Russo, who works in the Office of the Medical Examiner in Salt Lake City, is one of the relative few death investigators across the country who are routinely collecting such data, even though sexuality or gender identity can be relevant to the circumstances surrounding a person’s death....

Studies of L.G.B.T.Q. people show they have high rates of suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts, factors that greatly increase the risk of suicide.

But because most death investigators do not collect data on sexuality or gender identity, no one knows how many gay and transgender people die by suicide each year in the United States. The information vacuum makes it difficult to tailor suicide prevention efforts to meet the needs of the people most at risk, and to measure how well the programs work, researchers said.

The report ends on this note, which I also think important, and wish gay and trans activists would take to heart:

It’s also important to acknowledge the unknowns, Dr. Staley said. Although studies have reported a high rate of suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts among lesbian, gay and transgender people, that doesn’t necessarily mean a high rate of suicides. He noted that although women have a higher rate of suicide attempts than men do, men have a much higher rate of dying by suicide, partly because they have more access to guns.

And Dr. Staley, who is gay, cautioned against political narratives that “normalize suicide as part of the queer experience.”

“I would argue that if anything, this life experience sets us up to be resilient,” he said. “Our fate is not sealed. Our story is not written.”

 

 

Confirmed: biggest defamation case self-own since Oscar Wilde

I can't be the only person who has said that, about this:

Ben Roberts-Smith VC, Australia’s most decorated living soldier, has lost a defamation case in which he was accused of multiple murder of unarmed civilians in Afghanistan, a federal court judge has found.

The case only happened because of funding by Kerry Stokes, who seems to have more money than brains.   I don't think I had heard this before:

Roberts-Smith took out a loan from his employer, the media baron Kerry Stokes, to run the defamation action: if he loses, he has offered his Victoria Cross as collateral.

Is there any value at all left in a VC awarded to someone we are now free to call a murderer?  

Update:  Yes, Google shows me that Green Left made the Wilde comparison back in March 2022:

Roberts-Smith does not seem the kind of guy to relate to Oscar Wilde. That’s a shame, as he may have learned something about starting a libel case over public allegations that you’ve been doing the same sort of thing that a whole bunch of people are going to stand up in court and say you’ve been doing.

But now that I check, I said it in February 2022.  I bet there was someone who said it earlier, though.  

By the way, the Green Left post contains this useful mega link paragraph about the ridiculous amount of harmful material that came out from this trial:

Some of the headlines since the court case began last year include: SAS soldier tells court Ben Roberts-Smith ordered shooting of detained Afghan man; Ben Roberts-Smith described alleged execution of Afghan teen as ‘beautiful thing’, court hears; Witness stands by claims Ben Roberts-Smith was instrumental in two Afghan executions; Ben Roberts-Smith shot Afghan captive in the back, SAS member tells defamation trial; SAS soldier cried describing Roberts-Smith kicking man off cliff, court told; Former soldier tells court Ben Roberts-Smith ordered mock execution during training; Ben Roberts-Smith used software to ‘scrub’ laptop but denies destroying evidence; SAS soldier tells Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial war veteran threatened to shoot him in head; Superior officer tells court Ben Roberts-Smith threatened to ‘smash his face in’; Ben Roberts-Smith punched woman in face in Canberra hotel room, court told; Private investigator tells court he severed ties with Ben Roberts-Smith over alleged threatening letters; Soldiers believe events that earned Ben Roberts-Smith Victoria Cross may have been ‘falsified’, court hears.

Why do we put up with Airbnb in a time of chronic housing shortage?

I was speaking to some friends on the weekend who will going to Europe later this year, using Airbnb accommodation.   I said I would not do that, given the possibility of last minute cancellation, a recent uptick in complaints on social media about painful owners, and more generally, I've always had a bit of an objection in principal to the whole concept, at least in areas with a housing/long term rental shortage.   Sure, the company will promote it as being a way people who are asset rich but income poor can make money, although in many cases, they could also do it via long term rental.

I suppose I have less objection if it is a case of short term rental of part of a dual occupancy property - someone who has a granny flat in the back yard might be leery about the risk of getting a permanent tenant who is painful or annoying but difficult to get rid of under long term tenancy laws.   (And local councils don't always allow permanent tenancy of such accommodation anyway.)   But if you own a small apartment, or a house, in an area facing chronic long term rental shortages, keeping it for short term holiday rental is hurting your local community, and it's not as if you can't make money from long term rental.

So I went looking for how many Airbnb there are at the moment in Australia, and the numbers sound pretty high to me, even though they are way down on previous years.  This report is from July 2021:

Listing numbers in Sydney fell 43 per cent from an average of 33,955 in the first quarter of 2020 to 19,257 for the same period this year. They have since dropped to 12,728, by far their lowest point since at least 2018.

The situation is not much better in Melbourne with listings down from 30,126 to 19,354 in the 12 months to March 31 this year, a decline of 36 per cent. On Saturday, there were 14,569 active short-term rental properties in the city.

Interestingly, I see that in 2018, Airbnb had a report done to fend off complaints about its effect on the rental market. One of their points was that their numbers were too small to worry about:

 But the figures in the July 2021 article would indicate that those figures in 2018 were much lower than the figures achieved in 2020.   

I wonder what the figures are now, in the post Covid recovery?   I can't find them quickly.

I would suspect that they would have increased since July 2021, so lets assume there are a total of 30,000 in Sydney and Melbourne, roughly 15,000 each.  And how many rentals are vacant at the moment?  That's easy to find:

This chart is for Sydney, and indicates roughly 10,000 vacancies, giving a vacancy rate of about 1%.  this is a "tight" rental market.

Based on that, yes, adding even 10,000 Airbnb rental properties is going to double the vacancy rate - it would clearly make a substantial difference.

As this 2022 article at the ABC noted:

Across the world, major tourist destinations are moving to regulate short-stay rentals.

In Amsterdam, an entire home can only be rented out for a maximum of 30 nights per year.

While in New York, it is generally illegal to rent out an entire unit for less than 30 days. Although there are exceptions.

Meanwhile, Berlin allows you to lease out your primary residence, but it can be a bit harder to put a second home on the short-term market and you can only let a secondary residence out for a maximum of 90 days.

"Making the regulation is probably the easy part," Professor Phibbs said.

"Enforcing the regulation can be quite difficult. It's certainly resource-intensive. It sometimes involves quite long legal processes.

"It's important to have some kind of taxing regime where short-term rentals pay for the cost of that regulation through some sort of bed tax."

In Australia, New South Wales has 180-day caps in some areas, while Western Australia has been investigating a 60-day cap.

Meanwhile, Hobart is hoping to become the first capital city to place a cap on the number of short stays.

Professor Phibbs is pretty scathing:

Professor Phibbs said the number of Airbnbs in the city equated to about 9 per cent of the total rental market. 

That is much higher than in any other capital city in Australia.

And Hobart's rental vacancy rate is just 0.3 per cent — the lowest for any capital city.

During the pandemic, the balance has shifted.

"When housing stock went from short-term rental back to the long-term rental market, in places like Hobart we saw a sharp reduction in rents," he said.

Professor Phibbs estimated that during COVID, rents in Hobart dropped by about 9 per cent. 

Another study in Sydney by William Thackway and Christopher Pettit found rent prices in the most active Airbnb neighbourhoods dropped by up to 7 per cent.

While not all of this can be attributed to Airbnb, Professor Phibbs said the evidence was clear: You cannot have an unregulated short-term accommodation industry and a healthy long-term rental market. 

"Those two things just can't co-exist," he said.

"We need some sort of regulation to limit the spread of short-term rentals so we can enable the long-term rental market to provide homes for so many households that are looking for them at the moment."

Yep, Airbnb and its ilk is a real problem, and I reckon every capital city in Australia (or even local areas with long term rental shortage) should be attacking it every way they can.

Oh, and here's an article co-authored by Professor Phipps on The Conversation from March 2023 which I hadn't read before, making many good points.  People should be paying more attention, I reckon.

Anyway, I'm kind of glad my innate dislike of Airbnb can be actually justified with hard figures.

I suppose I should admit, I can think of 2 occasions over the last 20 years I have stayed at short term holiday rental of houses in Australia, through Stayz or some now defunct site.  But the last time was probably 6 years ago, in what would count as a semi-country area holiday home.  It's not as if Airbnb invented holiday homes:  they just made short term rental in urban areas too easy. 

Is there some hidden motive for such hyperbole that I can't see?

Leading experts warn of a risk of extinction from AI

Please, continue to put me in the "not at all convinced" column.

I mean, this is one of the dangers listed in the BBC report on the warning:

Enfeeblement, where humans become dependent on AI "similar to the scenario portrayed in the film Wall-E"

 [Insert roll eyes emoji]

Sichuan pepper primer

I  noted last week that I cooked with Sichuan (or Szechuan) pepper for the first time, and I liked the result.

I didn't mention, though, that there was an issue with the pepper being gritty, which I assumed was the result of my not having ground the roasted pepper hard enough.

However, on further investigation, apparently you're supposed to remove the hard inner seed completely, as it will never be ground far enough to not feel "gritty" in the cooking.  Despite initial appearances, these are not similar to peppercorns in any way, and you only use the (pretty light weight) outer shell, even though this seems like a pretty fiddly job when you have a packet of whole Sichuan pepper.   

Learn something new every day.  

Completely normal behaviour for a sex assault victim

Tara Reade, a former Senate staffer who in 2020 accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, said on Tuesday she had defected to Russia.

“I’m still kind of in a daze a bit but I feel very good,” Reade told Sputnik, a Russian press outlet supportive of President Vladimir Putin, while sitting with Maria Butina, a convicted Russian agent jailed in the US but now a member of parliament in Russia.

From The Guardian.

 

A good time not to be in Hanoi

In the news: 

Vietnam is turning off street lights and manufacturers are switching operations to off-peak hours to keep the national power system running amid record temperatures in some areas that have caused a surge in demand.

As weather officials warn the heatwave could run into June, several cities have cut back on public lighting and government offices have been urged to cut power use by a tenth after state utility EVN said the national grid faced strain in coming weeks.

"It's so harsh and hot outside that people have to wear protective clothing to cool down and not get burned," said Hanoi resident Tran Van Hung, 67.

Temperatures this week are expected to range between 26 degrees Celsius and 38 degrees Celsius, weather officials say.

To tackle the problem, Hanoi has shortened the duration of public lighting by an hour each day, while halving illumination on some major roads and in public parks.

"If people all save energy, all will have enough electricity to use, but if not, there will be a partial electrical overload that will put the power grid at risk," said Luong Minh Quan, an electrician with EVN in Hanoi.

Last week Vietnam called for electrical devices to be turned off when not in use, and for air-conditioning to be kept above 26 degrees Celsius.

I have to say, the second half of February was a pretty good time, weather wise, to be in Hanoi.  March might be even better, if going to the seaside areas especially.  But clearly, May is too late.

 

On buying a new refrigerator

Last weekend was pretty irritating:  our main refrigerator died, after lingering with what seemed to be decreasing cooling for quite a while.  Turns out it wasn't just our terrible habit of loading up the thing with half used jars of pastes, pickles, jams and condiments of one type or another, only to throw them out a few years after their expiry date.   I'm not joking:  I found a large jar of home made, souped up soy sauce my wife had labelled in 2012!  Maybe refrigerated soy sauce with plums in it lasts for more than a decade, but I did have approval to throw it out.

Anyway, looking for a new refrigerator, I have realised that the general design of them seems to have gotten deeper as the years go on.   Already, the deceased fridge stuck out past the cabinetry it is beside; the new one is going to have 10 cm more protrusion.  (Maybe it will come down to 5 cm, as we have left about a 10cm gap between the back of the current one and the wall, as you are supposed to do.  I suspect that gap can be smaller without disaster, though.)

The other thing of interest is how many refrigerators come from China, and although they make some reasonable looking ones, I figure that these days, if you are buying any product for which you might want a spare part in even 5 or 10 years time, it feels a risk to be relying on having access to stuff from China in that period.  I mean, I still don't care if I have a Chinese built phone - no one expects spare parts for them - but cars and whitegoods - you don't throw them out and just get a new one lightly.    

Or is this why China might think it can invade Taiwan without long term consequence:  it makes 90 million refrigerators a year, although I don't know how many of those are exported.   "You can't keep your trade bans on us forever - you have millions of fridges needing spare parts, and people hate replacing fridges unless they really have to!"  

But I'll be OK - the one I intend buying was built in Vietnam.   

Don't say I didn't warn you.

 

Seems to still be relevant

I finally watched the remake of All Quiet on the Western Front on Netflix on the weekend. 

I hadn't read any reviews, except I assumed that it must be OK to have had a Best Picture nomination.   

I would rate it pretty highly, with some reservations which I see were shared with some critics, mainly to do with it having too light a touch on character development.   The one we (eventually) get to feel closest to is not even the main character, and for the first 30 minutes, I wasn't even sure that the distant feeling given to characterisation was going to put me off the movie completely.  

But it does improve in that regard, and the obscene pointlessness of the war is well made by the end.   

It's depressing to think that, more than 100 years later, we can see watch aggression borne of militaristic nationalism causing pointless destruction in Ukraine:  

 

Week end thoughts

*  The late Tina Turner:  pop music not being all that important to me, it's not like she was a performer I would ever have bothered seeing, and I rate her songs as being in the "inoffensive to sometimes catchy" range.   But, she seems to have been a genuinely nice person, and I have to agree - the Rugby League marketing campaign featuring her and her songs was, like, probably the best campaign of its kind we will ever see in a lifetime?  (And again, it's not as if Rugby League is important to me, even though I may watch about 3 games a year - it's just that the quality and likeability of that campaign was undeniable.)

* There seems to be an awful lot of gullible promotion of alleged evidence of UFO's lately.  That Mick West manages to debunk most with relative ease, but there is still some kind of mystery going on, especially at sea, I reckon.

*  This certainly belongs in the "funny because it's true" category:

*  And although this is very old, in light of another Fast and Furious silly movie being released, this is also very amusing:

* Here's an idle thought:  back in 1982, in ET, a kid wore big headphones while riding his bicycle and I think audiences were meant to, and did, take it as a geeky, not cool, look.    Fast forward 40 years, and  adults now walk around with headphones anywhere: in the supermarket, on the bus, etc; and no one - except me perhaps - seems to thinks it's a bad look.    Discrete earphones I can handle, but headphones just look too anti-social to me.  A "don't bother me, I'm in my own world" kinda vibe.

 

 

If you wrote a character doing this in a comedy movie, critics would say it's too unrealistic

 

What? Something multivitamins are good for?

It seems that research on the benefit of taking supplementary vitamins (at least if you are a person with a reasonable diet and no obvious cause to have deficiencies) are pretty rarely positive, so it is a surprise to read this in the Washington Post:

A daily multivitamin — an inexpensive, over-the-counter nutritional supplement — may help slow memory loss in people ages 60 and older, a large nationwide clinical trial suggests.

The research, a collaboration between scientists at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Columbia University, appeared in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition on Wednesday.

It was the second such multivitamin clinical study within the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) — a larger body of research examining the health effects of certain dietary supplements — to reach the same conclusion.

The most recent study found that those taking multivitamins showed an estimated 3.1 fewer years of memory loss compared with a control group who took a placebo. Put another way, the multivitamin group was an estimated 3.1 years “younger” in terms of their memory function than the placebo group.

The full report is here.

 

Another problematic take

Former Pink Floyd member Roger Waters did a concert in Germany a few days ago, which featured this:

Roger Waters projected Anne Frank’s name at recent concerts to draw comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany, leading Germany’s Orthodox rabbinical association to call for a ban on Waters’ performances in the country.

Observers told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that Waters, the former Pink Floyd frontman known as a leader in the boycott Israel movement, has lumped Anne Frank together with Palestinian Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in on-screen projections at concerts on his current tour. Abu Akleh was killed on an assignment in the West Bank last year.

The screen at Waters concerts also frequently shows a pig-shaped balloon emblazoned with the logo of an Israeli armaments firm. He reportedly at times dons an SS uniform and symbolically shoots a machine gun into the crowd.

But - he's been doing this for years, as it would seem this report is from 2013:

Former Pink Floyd rocker Roger Waters is one musician who isn’t afraid to voice his opinion on Israel.

Waters performed July 20 in Belgium wearing a black leather jacket with a red and white arm band, similar to that of a Nazi uniform, while pretending to fire a machine gun. The concert also featured a giant pig balloon floating above stage with the Star of David stamped all over it.

Waters has openly urged other performers to boycott Israel and has compared Israel’s occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to the South African apartheid. The Anti-Defamation League said that Waters has a long history using  these symbols in his concerts, according to the Jerusalem Post.

Not caring for the band, I had missed this recent story:

Polly Samson, the wife of Pink Floyd’s David Gilmour and a lyricist on the band’s two most recent albums, has spoken out against former bandleader Roger Waters on Twitter, describing him as an antisemite and a “Putin apologist”.

“Sadly [Waters] you are antisemitic to your rotten core,” she wrote. “Also a Putin apologist and a lying, thieving, hypocritical, tax-avoiding, lip-synching, misogynistic, sick-with-envy, megalomaniac. Enough of your nonsense.”...

 Samson’s tweet is seemingly in reference to an interview Waters did with the Berliner Zeitung newspaper earlier this month, reposted in translation on Waters’ website, in which he wonders if “Putin [is] a bigger gangster than Joe Biden and all those in charge of American politics since World War II”, and says that Putin “governs carefully, making decisions on the grounds of a consensus in the Russian Federation government.”

In the interview, Waters also said that “Israel Lobby activists” were trying to have his concerts in Germany cancelled, and that “the Israelis are committing genocide. Just like Great Britain did during our colonial period … We believed ourselves to be inherently superior to the indigenous people, just as the Israelis do in Palestine.” He also expresses his continued support for the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, and that he would still play in Moscow, “given that Moscow does not run an apartheid state based on the genocide of the indigenous inhabitants.”

 

A problematic take

Not sure that I should highlight this, given I don't independently know any details of her life struggles, but surely I can't be the only person to read this and not conclude that it sounds like a case of neuroticism (or some other mental health diagnosis) which finds a convenient blame outlet in claims of extreme racism.  (She's not the only neurotic sounding indigenous woman - including several in academia - who are on Twitter.  They really are going to explode if the Voice referendum fails.)      

As with Sandy O'Sullivan, there seems to be an awareness that they are known as "difficult" or "too much", even within their own group, who they get upset with if they don't take the same line.  

What bothers me most about it is that this rhetoric is extremely unhelpful messaging to young indigenous who we want to succeed in the system they live in (a modern, capitalist State with a pretty good, if imperfect, welfare system), rather than live lives of continual resentment.  

Recipes and diet, discussed

This looks and sounds nice to me:

It's a recipe from the Washington Post.  I don't subscribe to the much more famous recipe section of the New York Times, so it's WAPO for me.

The recipe is:  Orange-Sichuan Pepper Chicken.   I want to cook it because I don't think I have ever used Sichuan pepper in a recipe before, and I only learnt recently that the type of heat it brings is (apparently) distinctive.  (I also quite like savoury dishes that include fruit - a matter of some contention in my household, as half line up on the "meat and fruit don't really belong together" side.)

Which reminds me:  on Saturday I cooked lamb saag, successfully, following this recipe.  It called for three green chillis, and as they seemed hot to me, I de-seeded them with my hands.   (I know - most of the heat is supposed to be in the white fibres that the seeds are attached to.  I pulled them off with my hands too.)   The result was an interesting "chilli hand" effect that lasted for hours, and when I was having a shower it was particularly noticeable that the hot water made the affected hand parts tingle very strongly.   It wasn't exactly painful, just very noticeable and very long lasting.  I have never had the same sensation from other chillies, perhaps because I usually am only using small ones which affect the fingertips at most; and truth be told, I do find myself 95% of the time using dried chilli flakes when I want chilli heat in a recipe. 

I also watched a video recently that spent about 40 minutes explaining why vegan diets are not (long term) healthy, due to the great difficulty in getting all nutrients needed from a purely plant based diet.  It was citing a lot of studies, and cases of internet vegans who had to give up because of digestive and other issues they just couldn't solve on a vegan diet, and it all sounded very convincing.  But then I discovered that the guy's Youtube channel also contained Jordan Peterson content, in an unironic way.  This gives me a trust issue.

A second video I watched on another channel cited a lot of health benefits of plant diets, but it was obvious when watching it that the studies referred to "vegetarian/vegan diets", which is a bit of a cheat, given that (unfortunately, in my view) veganism has replaced vegetarianism as the "go to" alternative to the normal omnivore diet, and studies that lump both types of diet together are not going to reliably say much about veganism alone.    

Obviously, I am still eating a lot of meat, even though I am just curious enough about some vegan recipes to occasionally (very occasionally!) try them.   

But I still say, if ever I choose to give up meat for animal cruelty reasons, I would never worry about eating animals low on the intelligence/emotional capacity scale, such as most seafood, with the possible exception of octopus.  And I would also be hard pressed to ever give up dairy and eggs, even though both routinely mean the early killing of "unnecessary" offspring.  (That may soon change with eggs, though.)   

And if you are going to include eggs, dairy and seafood in your diet, but leave out all other meat, I presume that it's easy to get all nutrients from that diet.   But someone should do a Youtube confirming that.   The "Everything but Meat" diet, and its benefits.

Update:  made the chicken dish last night - it's good!   Just used jar crushed garlic - mincing 9 fresh ones is a bit of effort and I was in a hurry.   And yeah, Sichuan pepper does have a distinctive smell and flavour.

Never has a knife been so sharpened for a movie

As I have mentioned before, there is an online world of Right-ish movie/culture critics who writhe about how "woke" feminism (and, to a degree, queer promotion) has ruined the Star Wars franchise, the Tolkien franchise, the Marvel franchise, etc.  Prime amongst them is the guy called the Critical Drinker, and I do watch some of his Youtube videos, as well as some of those by Nerdtronic.  

I have to confess that, to a significant degree, they have a point.   (I mean, I posted about the huge female presence in The Last Jedi at the time, and how a major thread in the story was about how stupid and impulsive men are.)    And there is no doubt that Marvel has been working to promote stories with female leads, with increasingly diminished critical and audience returns.  And Disney cartoons now feature gay characters, not that I think that is necessarily a bad thing.   But still, none of this feels organic:  it is just  too obvious.

That said, it's not as if the problems with the Star Wars franchise are just due to this:  I have argued before that the fundamental issue is the lack of a clear and consistent treatment of the Force throughout the series.  And I think it is just not that interesting a universe without some consistency on a fundamental thing like that.   As for Marvel:  it is a mistake to base a meta theme on the multiverse, because it is an idea that can drain away tension in dramatic storytelling - if anything can happen, nothing much matters.

Anyway, a key figure of hate - the key person the Right wing critics attack for this - is producer Kathleen Kennedy.  And as she is behind the latest Indiana Jones movie (Dial of Destiny), they have been slavering about how she is going to ruin it like she's ruined everything else. 

I think it's kind of funny:  the movie has so far been getting mixed reviews from its showing at Cannes - it has 50% on the not always reliable Rottentomatoes - and I think quite a few are putting it below the first three movies but a tad above Crystal Skull (which I think is unfairly demonised.)    If that is the true positioning, the movie is bound to make a squillion dollars regardless of these bearded critics say.  

But boy, have they been pre-emptively promoting the critical and audience downfall of this movie.

They are, just like the woke producers who they hate, being just too obvious that there is no way they are going to give the movie anything like an objective viewing.

And who knows - I may not like it, either.  The ending apparently is divisive, and a bit fantasy-ish, and my biggest concern is that I will read what it is before I get to see it.

I still think the trailer looks quite OK, though...

Stan's word salad

When I search his name in my search bar at the side of the blog, I see that I have been complaining about the waffle of Stan Grant for many, many years.  

His parting shot on Q&A is a spectacular example of his pompously earnest word salad style - and now he adds apparent indigenous spirituality that is as obscure in meaning and consequence as is about half of all commentary he makes.     

No doubt he does get purely racist rubbish thrown at him continually on media and social media.   

But I still think his style is grating in a way that has nothing to do with his skin colour.

I'm also against Q&A as a format, as many people I follow on Twitter are.  I haven't watched more than short bits of it for quite a few years.

Gender waffle

Probably a good idea that the Guardian not provide for comments to this piece, because it is bound to invite skepticism, if not ridicule, of the whole gender ideology that seems to have leaked out of universities' humanities departments and infected a surprising large number of younger people.  Here's the subheading:

Madison Godfrey inhabits gender beyond a binary, but transition isn’t what makes them trans

Here's part of her piece:

Not every non-binary person labels themselves under the transgender umbrella – but some do. My transness is not about feeling uncomfortable in my body; it is about feeling uncomfortable with the gender that was allocated to this body. Although I was once assigned female at birth, on days when I wear winged eyeliner and a crop top that makes my boobs look great, I am still non-binary. Medically transitioning, sometimes involving hormone therapy or surgical procedures, can constitute an integral part of a person’s journey of gender affirmation – but pursuing this process is not a prerequisite of being trans or non-binary, and does not determine the validity of anyone’s gender identity. Imagining it as a checklist overlooks the barriers often encountered by trans people who want to medically transition – such as inaccessibility, costliness, wait times and stigma perpetuated by some practitioners. To suggest that being trans requires a specific type of transition is to enforce a hierarchy that is ultimately elitist.

The assumption that every trans person wants to transition also reproduces stale discourse that all trans folk feel “born into the wrong body”: a stereotype that shouldn’t be uniformly applied. As poet Sam Rush writes, “I wasn’t born into the wrong body, I was born into the right lesson.” For some people, transitioning is literally lifesaving – but squeezing all trans narratives into a narrow trope erases individual experiences, minimises us into a caricature of ourselves, and is ultimately boring. Trans and non-binary folk inhabit more than one character description. Besides, just because someone pursues transition doesn’t mean they hate their body. Consider the moment when you change your outfit just before leaving the house; it’s not that you necessarily hated the initial fit, you just want to wear something that makes you feel more like yourself.

So, rather than simply acknowledge that some men have apparently feminine traits, and some women have "butch" traits, and may or may not be fully (or partially) same sex attracted with it, and everyone has known this forever; people now spend an incredible amount of time on what is increasing hard for me to not see as an intensely narcissistic endeavour of self analysis and self justification for their own tastes in how they want to present themselves.  

Incidentally, I think the gist of this article is the same line that Eddy Izzard takes:  he has been "out" forever as an occasional transvestite who only sleeps with women, but now he has decided he is "transgender", although one with no problem going forward with penis intact (and, I think, only sleeping with women.)   

This is kind of weird to most people, but harmless up to a point:  it becomes problematic when they insist that we all have to accept a dubious and faddish intellectual framework ("trans women are women!", "being non binary and trans is a thing") and all of its consequences because that's what suits them.

Update:  The column has attracted some comment on Twitter:

 Many are along these lines:

The inevitable problem with the Voice appears already

I mean, I don't want to be negative about the idea of the federal government having to give due consideration to an indigenous "voice" on legislation that affects the indigenous community. It sounds fair as a concept, and there is precedent from other countries.

But I find this week's argument between Mick Gooda and Noel Pearson about the wording of the relevant amendment pretty much an endorsement of my prediction the concept is going to have serious practical problems even if it gets up.    

I happened to see Gooda on 7.30 talking about his concerns, and he came across as very reasonable and cautious and well intentioned.   Pearson's response comes across as bullying and unfair, and perhaps someone needs to have a word in his ear (and Langton's, and that of anyone else who takes this line) that the more belligerent they sound (and the more they claim it will be disastrous to the future of indigenous politics if the referendum fails), the more they are likely to push skeptics to voting "no".  [I can imagine a huge number of aboriginal activists outraged that it's racist and paternalistic to effectively tell them to "behave" if they want to get their way - but I would say it's more a case of realism and pragmatism based on the history of referenda in this country.]

Long story short:  if there is already strong friction between long standing, mainstream aboriginal leadership figures on the implementation of this system, why shouldn't we expect that the instituional "Voice" will also routinely be the subject of criticism from within the indigenous community that it has given the "wrong" advice to government on particular issues?    And if so, how will that changes things going forward?      

I suspect that the problem in Australia may come down to the size of the country and hence the number of groupings of indigenous here:

Aboriginal people belong to Mobs (tribes) and within those are Clans (family groups). There are over 250 Mobs in Australia and even more Clans (some Mobs have upwards of 7 clans). Most Aboriginal people will have a ‘moiety,’ ‘totem’ or ‘spirit protector’ and usually an individual will have more than one – tribal, gender, family, personal.

All Mobs have their own ‘Country’ with boundaries that are typically marked on trees and by natural landscapes such as a river being a boundary between two neighbouring tribes or clans.

I would bet that most countries with successful institutionalised indigenous advisory bodies that are formalised just don't have that problem.   

 

Right up my alley

 It's not published until the end of the year.  It's only 208 pages long - why such a long lead time?

Goff has been mentioned at least once before here, but I don't recall if I have read much about him before.   I have found his views on Wikipedia.  A defender of some form of panpsychism, I see.  

Well, I do like the way he is trying to find a path forward between religion and scientific materialism.

A Friday religion post

I was just thinking how I hadn't had a new, interesting thought about Buddhism for a few weeks, Googled the topic, and turned up this good essay at Aeon:

Reckoning with Compassion

It deals with my long standing concern about Buddhist approaches:  while teaching a fairly simple or straight forward moral behaviour code on one level, on another, an emphasis on the source of suffering being desire (and teaching the importance of meditating that away) can surely lead to a kind of passive acceptance of other people's bad behaviour (as well as "natural evil", such as illness), even if it impacts you directly and an non-passive approach may be what is really required.   In the essay writer's case, this related to sexual abuse, and she talks about "compassion" teaching in Mahayana and Tibetan Buddhism and the way it can led to a passive response to wrongdoing.  

Here are some extracts:

So perilous is the habit of self-cherishing that Mahāyāna teachers devised radical methods for extricating oneself from it. These moral-psychological therapies require that the practitioner take up dramatically counterintuitive attitudes in order to reveal and unravel the depth of their self-cherishing. Among the most celebrated of these teachers is the 8th-century Indian scholar Śāntideva, whose text the Bodhicaryāvatāra is widely admired and studied as the guide to Mahāyāna ethics. There, among his philosophical expositions of the way of life of the bodhisattva, Śāntideva encourages his reader to reflect upon the fundamental equality of all beings and the indefensibility of pursuing one’s own self-interest on the basis of a dubiously reified ‘I’. He also proposes that one can counteract one’s tendency toward selfishness by taking a pointedly critical perspective toward one’s own shortcomings, including negative emotions such as anger. Rather than directing our anger at the people we believe have done us wrong, Śāntideva advises that we should depersonalise the problems that befall us and chalk them up to the inevitable vicissitudes of a complex and interdependent world. In other words: ‘Them’s the breaks.’

This is a practice that strikes right at the logic that inspires self-cherishing. The thinking goes: if I weren’t so heavily invested in my own selfhood as something intrinsically real, with discrete interests to defend, then I would not experience others’ slights with such a personal charge. This is not to say that I wouldn’t experience them at all – that they wouldn’t be happening or that I wouldn’t notice them – but rather that I would be able to let those misbehaviours slide off me, simply regarding them as the product of innumerable, impersonal causes and conditions rather than targeted attacks on me and my ability to have things always go my way. When someone does this, Śāntideva argues, they become invincible to suffering not by changing others’ behaviour but by cultivating the mental fortitude to withstand life’s provocations with forbearance. Śāntideva suggests a contemplative practice for inculcating this radically diminished sense of self known as ‘exchanging self and other’, in which the practitioner imaginatively ‘exchanges’ their own happiness for others’ suffering. Being willing to give up happiness and take on pain enacts the kind of unbiased, boundless altruism that is the hallmark of the bodhisattva....

 Experimenting with reversing habitual responses like defensiveness or selfishness is profound. Relaxing our territoriality and letting go of our need to always be ‘right’ (or at least our need to make sure others know when they are wrong) can have a salutary effect on how we engage with others. But there are also profound problems with this approach.

And the downside:

Some time ago, a friend who works with survivors of sexual violence put a challenging but tactful question to me: what about her clients, whose trauma so often shows itself through self-blame? The majority of sexual assaults occur between people who know each other, often through methods of coercion that falsely lead victims to conclude that they ‘let it happen’ or are in some other respect to blame for the abuse. In cases like these, it is incredibly important to be able to say (and be heard in saying): ‘They were in the wrong. This was not my fault.’

A similar pattern holds, I suspect, for many people who have experienced abuse and certain forms of oppression. The fact is that there is a lot of explicit and implicit social encouragement not to be hard on others, to be accommodating, to get over it – in other words, to internalise the costs of the harm that has been done to them rather than force the awkwardness of asserting a boundary. In cases like these, ‘banishing all blames into the single source’ becomes the emotional labour of ‘taking one for the team’.

Essentially, what my kind critic was telling me was that this ideal of viewing all of our problems and struggles as stemming from self-cherishing was actually a great way for victims of abuse never to be able to heal. Sometimes expressing and holding a boundary – a boundary between self and other, between one’s own needs and theirs, between the workable give and take of harmonious social discourse and occasions that require a hard ‘no’ – can be necessary and even therapeutic. Especially for someone who is already well practised in the habit of taking on the burden of other people’s wrongdoing, the instruction to ‘banish all blames to the single source’ may come all too naturally, re-inscribing their existing trauma rather than helping them heal and grow through it.

All pretty interesting, if you ask me.   

The article also links to this other Aeon essay, which I think I noticed before, but never got around to reading: The Problem of Mindfulness.   Must read it later.

As predicted by virtually everyone...

The news:

Disney’s venture into an immersive, very expensive Star Wars experience is ending.

The company said that its Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser hotel at Walt Disney World in Florida, which costs nearly $5,000 per couple for a two-night stay, will take its final voyage on Sept. 28.

It is hard to credit that Disney executives could not work out that most people into role playing games (which essentially was the whole point of staying at this hotel - or at least, the only basis on which the cost could be justified) are not rich.   More like college age dudes who haven't started making money yet.